Literature DB >> 31156751

Self-Myofascial Release Does Not Improve Back Squat Range of Motion, Alter Muscle Activation, or Aid in Perceived Recovery 24-Hours Following Lower Body Resistance Training.

Zach Beier1, Ian Earp1, J Adam Korak1.   

Abstract

Self-myofascial release (SMR) is an alternative therapy believed to increase myofascial mobility by exciting muscles and increasing blood flow to the treated area. Previous literature suggest SMR produces conflicting results on performance, muscle activation, range of motion (ROM), and recovery. This study was designed to utilize SMR on a fatigued individual prior to exercise and measure its' effects on muscle activation, ROM, and perceived recovery compared to a dynamic warm-up session. The findings could help develop an efficient warm-up protocol for resistance-trained individuals. Electromyography (EMG) measured muscle activation of the rectus femoris (RF) and the gluteus maximus (GM), while a bluetooth goniometer assessed knee ROM during a submaximal back-squat. Eleven resistance trained participants (estimated squat 1RM 163% body weight) completed four total sessions of testing with sessions 1 and 3 solely used to induce muscle fatigue. In a counterbalanced design, participants during sessions 2 and 4 received either a dynamic standardized warm-up, or a SMR warm-up. Participants performed 10 repetitions of the back-squat at 70% estimated 1RM load. Peak and mean muscle activation of both muscles, knee ROM, and participants' perceived recovery was measured during the submaximal repetitions during sessions 2 and 4. Results indicated no significant differences between the dynamic warm-up and SMR warm-up among muscle activation, knee ROM, and participants perceived recovery (p > 0.05). In resistance trained squatters, coaches/trainers can prescribe SMR or a dynamic warm-up/stretching routine for results indicated no differences in perceived recovery, muscle activation, or squat depth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foam Rolling; electromyography; flexibility; muscle soreness

Year:  2019        PMID: 31156751      PMCID: PMC6533090     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  2 in total

1.  Does the type of foam roller influence the recovery rate, thermal response and DOMS prevention?

Authors:  Jakub Grzegorz Adamczyk; Karol Gryko; Dariusz Boguszewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Does the Self-Myofascial Release Affect the Activity of Selected Lower Limb Muscles of Soccer Players?

Authors:  Tomasz Michalski; Tomasz Król; Piotr Michalik; Magdalena Rutkowska; Magdalena Dąbrowska-Galas; Damian Ziaja; Michał Kuszewski
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.