| Literature DB >> 31156590 |
Magdalene Adamczyk1, Frank Hagedorn1, Sonja Wipf2, Johanna Donhauser1, Pascal Vittoz3, Christian Rixen2, Aline Frossard1, Jean-Paul Theurillat4,5, Beat Frey1.
Abstract
While vegetation has intensively been surveyed on mountain summits, limited knowledge exists about the diversity and community structure of soil biota. Here, we study how climatic variables, vegetation, parent material, soil properties, and slope aspectEntities:
Keywords: GLORIA; alpine; bacteria; climate change; fungi; mountain summit; soil
Year: 2019 PMID: 31156590 PMCID: PMC6529532 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Overview of GLORIA summit locations in the Swiss Alps.
| Region | Region code | Summit | Summit code | Elevation [m a.s.l.] | Latitude (N) | Longitude (E) | Parent material |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swiss National Park | SN1 | Munt Buffalora | MBU | 2438 | 46° 38′ 19″ | 10° 14′ 37″ | Calcareous |
| Swiss National Park | SN1 | Munt Chavagl | MCH | 2542 | 46° 38′ 39″ | 10° 14′ 03″ | Calcareous |
| Swiss National Park | SN1 | Piz Murter | PMU | 2836 | 46° 38′ 45″ | 10° 08′ 30″ | Calcareous |
| Swiss National Park | SN2 | Mot sper Chamana Sesvenna | MCS | 2424 | 46° 44′ 08″ | 10° 25′ 43″ | Siliceous |
| Swiss National Park | SN2 | Minschuns | MIN | 2519 | 46° 38′ 44″ | 10° 20′ 17″ | Siliceous |
| Swiss National Park | SN2 | Mot dal Gajer | MDG | 2797 | 46° 41′ 40″ | 10° 19′ 52″ | Siliceous |
| Valais | VAL | La Ly | LAL | 2360 | 46° 01′ 51″ | 07° 14′ 57″ | Siliceous |
| Valais | VAL | Mont Brulé | BRU | 2550 | 46° 01′ 14″ | 07° 12′ 05″ | Siliceous |
| Valais | VAL | Pointe du Parc | PAR | 2989 | 45° 59′ 53″ | 07° 13′ 55″ | Siliceous |
| Valais | VAL | Pointe de Boveire | BOV | 3212 | 45° 59′ 40″ | 07° 14′ 24″ | Siliceous |
FIGURE 1Relative abundances of (A) bacterial and (B) fungal most abundant classes (>1%) across different summits. “Other” represents all classes with relative abundances < 1%. Summits are grouped by regions and ordered by increasing elevation (left–right) within. Region abbreviations: SN1 = Swiss National Park, calcareous parent material; SN2 = Swiss National Park, siliceous parent material; VAL = Valais, siliceous parent material. Summit abbreviations: MBU = Munt Buffalora; MCH = Munt Chavagl; PMU = Piz Murter; MCS = Mot sper Chamana Sesvenna; MIN = Minschuns; MDG = Mot dal Gajer; LAL = La Ly; BRU = Mont Brulé; PAR = Pointe du Parc; BOV = Pointe de Boveire.
FIGURE 2Variation of α-diversity of bacterial and fungal communities at different summits. Shown are (A) bacterial richness, (B) fungal richness, (C) bacterial Shannon index and (D) fungal Shannon index. Summits are grouped by regions and ordered by increasing elevation (left–right) within. Region abbreviations: SN1 = Swiss National Park, calcareous parent material; SN2 = Swiss National Park, siliceous parent material; VAL = Valais, siliceous parent material. Summit abbreviations: MBU = Munt Buffalora; MCH = Munt Chavagl; PMU = Piz Murter; MCS = Mot sper Chamana Sesvenna; MIN = Minschuns; MDG = Mot dal Gajer; LAL = La Ly; BRU = Mont Brulé; PAR = Pointe du Parc; BOV = Pointe de Boveire.
FIGURE 3Relationships of bacterial and fungal observed richness with elevation and selected environmental variables (A–H). Regression lines were fitted using linear mixed-effects models with region/summit/aspect as random effects. Fungal observed richness was transformed using Tukey’s ladder of powers. Abbreviations: SOC, soil organic carbon; MWST, mean winter soil temperature; n.s., not significant. Summit abbreviations: MBU = Munt Buffalora; MCH = Munt Chavagl; PMU = Piz Murter; MCS = Mot sper Chamana Sesvenna; MIN = Minschuns; MDG = Mot dal Gajer; LAL = La Ly; BRU = Mont Brulé; PAR = Pointe du Parc; BOV = Pointe de Boveire. Colours correspond to regions: Red = SN1, Swiss National Park, calcareous parent material; Blue = SN2, Swiss National Park, siliceous parent material; Green = VAL, Valais, siliceous parent material.
Effects of elevation, aspect and environmental variables on bacterial and fungal α-diversities analysed with multivariate linear mixed-effects regression.
| Fixed effects | DFnum | DFden | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1 | 97 | 0.00 | 0.9570 | |
| pH | 1 | 97 | 33.83 | <0.0001 | |
| Aspect | 3 | 16 | 3.13 | 0.0547 | |
| Elevation × Aspect | 4 | 16 | 8.34 | 0.0008 | |
| MWST × Aspect | 4 | 16 | 5.64 | 0.0050 | |
| Intercept | 1 | 96 | 1218.05 | <0.0001 | |
| pH | 1 | 96 | 96.15 | <0.0001 | |
| SOC | 1 | 96 | 23.50 | <0.0001 | |
| Aspect | 3 | 16 | 9.67 | 0.0007 | |
| Elevation × Aspect | 4 | 16 | 12.98 | 0.0001 | |
| MWST × Aspect | 4 | 16 | 11.38 | 0.0001 | |
| Intercept | 1 | 93 | 1624.34 | <0.0001 | |
| TN | 1 | 93 | 18.86 | <0.0001 | |
| Vegetation cover × Elevation | 1 | 93 | 23.55 | <0.0001 | |
| Vegetation cover × Aspect | 3 | 93 | 6.41 | 0.0005 | |
| MWST × Aspect | 4 | 23 | 4.71 | 0.0063 | |
| Intercept | 1 | 94 | 1,494.35 | <0.0001 | |
| Aspect | 3 | 24 | 2.51 | 0.0830 | |
| Vegetation cover × Elevation | 1 | 94 | 18.78 | <0.0001 | |
| Vegetation cover × Aspect | 3 | 94 | 5.52 | 0.0016 | |
FIGURE 4Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of (A) bacteria and (B) fungal β-diversities based on Bray–Curtis distance matrices. Distances between symbols on the ordination plot reflect relative dissimilarities in community structures. The variation in microbial community structures explained by each PCoA axis is given in parentheses.
Effects of elevation and selected individual environmental variables on bacterial and fungal community structures assessed by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA).
| Explanatory variable | Bacteria | Fungi | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variation | Variation | |||
| Elevation | 9.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Soil pH | 36.1% | 12.2% | ||
| MWST | 4.51 n.s. | 3.3% | 5.2% | |
| MSST | 8.71 n.s. | 6.2% | 6.2% | |
| SOC | 4.6% | 4.2% | ||
| TN | 4.4% | 4.1% | ||
| C:N | 7.00 n.s. | 5.0% | 2.5% | |
| Vegetation cover | 10.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Sand | 6.56 n.s. | 4.7% | 7.95 n.s. | 5.6% |
| Silt | 9.26 n.s. | 6.5% | 9.02 n.s. | 6.3% |
| Clay | 9.12 n.s. | 6.4% | 3.1% | |
Changes of the relative abundances of the most abundant bacterial and fungal phyla (>1%) with elevation and soil pH analysed with linear mixed-effects regression.
| Elevation | Soil pH | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Norm. slope | Direction of change | Norm. slope | Direction of change | ||
| -0.18 | ↓ | 3.2 n.s. | -0.10 | – | 2.0 n.s. | |
| -0.20 | ↓ | 4.3 n.s. | 0.04 | – | 0.2 n.s. | |
| 0.16 | ↑ | 7.7* | 0.05 | – | 0.9 n.s. | |
| 0.49 | ↑ | 46.8*** | -0.22 | ↓ | 5.9* | |
| 0.19 | ↑ | 7.9* | 0.33 | ↑ | 22.5*** | |
| -0.15 | ↓ | 2.4 n.s. | 0.37 | ↑ | 13.9*** | |
| -0.51 | ↓ | 71.4*** | 0.08 | – | 0.9 n.s. | |
| -0.46 | ↓ | 18.3** | 0.33 | ↑ | 11.4** | |
| -0.28 | ↓ | 15.1** | -0.07 | – | 0.8 n.s. | |
| -0.12 | – | 0.9 n.s. | -0.08 | – | 0.5 n.s. | |
| -0.31 | ↓ | 8.2* | -0.01 | – | 0.0 n.s. | |
| 0.36 | ↑ | 16.1** | 0.05 | – | 0.3 n.s. | |
Changes of the relative abundances of the most abundant bacterial and fungal classes (>1%) with elevation and soil pH analysed with linear mixed-effects regression.
| Elevation | Soil pH | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Norm. slope | Direction of change | Norm. slope | Direction of change | ||
| -0.17 | ↓ | 2.4 n.s. | -0.11 | ↓ | 2.3 n.s. | |
| -0.26 | ↓ | 9.6* | -0.09 | – | 0.8 n.s. | |
| -0.48 | ↓ | 20.0** | 0.00 | – | 0.0 n.s. | |
| 0.02 | – | 0.0 n.s. | 0.42 | ↑ | 36.8*** | |
| -0.18 | ↓ | 3.4 n.s. | 0.07 | – | 1.1 n.s. | |
| 0.27 | ↑ | 12.6* | -0.53 | ↓ | 44.6*** | |
| -0.32 | ↓ | 12.6* | -0.03 | – | 0.1 n.s. | |
| -0.49 | ↓ | 49.5*** | 0.08 | – | 0.9 n.s. | |
| -0.23 | ↓ | 6.0 n.s | -0.07 | – | 0.7 n.s. | |
| 0.2 | ↑ | 7.9* | -0.01 | – | 0.0 n.s. | |
| -0.42 | ↓ | 34.8** | -0.03 | – | 0.1 n.s. | |
| 0.10 | ↑ | 3.1 n.s. | 0.27 | ↑ | 11.9*** | |
| 0.03 | – | 0.1 n.s | 0.01 | – | 0.0 n.s. | |
| 0.17 | ↑ | 8.1* | -0.20 | ↓ | 4.5* | |
| -0.02 | – | 0.1 n.s. | -0.02 | – | 0.1 n.s. | |
| -0.02 | – | 0.1 n.s. | 0.15 | ↑ | 2.0 n.s. | |
| -0.06 | – | 0.4 n.s. | 0.10 | – | 1.1 n.s. | |
| 0.36 | ↑ | 16.1** | 0.05 | – | 0.3 n.s. | |
FIGURE 5Comparison of α and β-diversities between microbial and plant communities. Upper scatterplots show relationships of plant richness with (A) bacterial richness (F = 1.04, p = 0.31) and (B) fungal richness (F = 0.48, p = 0.49). Lower plots show relationships of plant β-diversity with (C) bacterial β-diversity (ρ = 0.57, p = 0.001) and (D) fungal β-diversity (ρ = 0.47, p = 0.004). In (C,D) each point represents the dissimilarities (Bray–Curtis) of taxonomic composition between a pair of summits (colours represent regions of each summit). The significances of correlations of α-diversity were assessed applying ANOVA to the output of linear mixed-effects models (random effects: region/summit/aspect). The significances of the correlations for β-diversity were assessed by Mantel tests with 9,999 permutations based on Spearman’s rank method. Region abbreviations: SN1 = Swiss National Park, calcareous parent material; SN2 = Swiss National Park, siliceous parent material; VAL = Valais, siliceous parent material. Summit abbreviations: MBU = Munt Buffalora; MCH = Munt Chavagl; PMU = Piz Murter; MCS = Mot sper Chamana Sesvenna; MIN = Minschuns; MDG = Mot dal Gajer; LAL = La Ly; BRU = Mont Brulé; PAR = Pointe du Parc; BOV = Pointe de Boveire.
FIGURE 6Bacterial genera identified as significant indicators (q < 0.05) of calcareous or siliceous parent material (strength of correlation index > 0.75), grouped by phyla. The colour of the heatmap represents the strength of indication. The bars represent the relative abundance of each indicator OTU in all the samples.(Indicator OTUs with a relative abundance of < 0.01% are not shown. Repeated phyla/genera names omitted for easier visualisation. Full taxonomic assignment, indicator and significance values of all bacterial OTUs are reported in Supplementary Data
FIGURE 7Fungal genera identified as significant indicators (q < 0.05) of calcareous or siliceous parent material (strength of correlation index > 0.4), grouped by phyla. The colour of the heatmap represents the strength of indication. The bars represent the relative abundance of each indicator OTU in all the samples. Indicator OTUs with a relative abundance of < 0.01% are not shown. Repeated phyla/genera names omitted for easier visualisation. Full taxonomic assignment, indicator and significance values of all fungal OTUs are reported in Supplementary Data S5.