Literature DB >> 31155778

Seeing the light: urban stream restoration affects stream metabolism and nitrate uptake via changes in canopy cover.

Alexander J Reisinger1,2, Thomas R Doody3, Peter M Groffman1,4, Sujay S Kaushal3, Emma J Rosi1.   

Abstract

The continually increasing global population residing in urban landscapes impacts numerous ecosystem functions and services provided by urban streams. Urban stream restoration is often employed to offset these impacts and conserve or enhance the various functions and services these streams provide. Despite the assumption that "if you build it, [the function] will come," current understanding of the effects of urban stream restoration on stream ecosystem functions are based on short term studies that may not capture variation in restoration effectiveness over time. We quantified the impact of stream restoration on nutrient and energy dynamics of urban streams by studying 10 urban stream reaches (five restored, five unrestored) in the Baltimore, Maryland, USA, region over a two-year period. We measured gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER) at the whole-stream scale continuously throughout the study and nitrate (NO3 - -N) spiraling rates seasonally (spring, summer, autumn) across all reaches. There was no significant restoration effect on NO3 - -N spiraling across reaches. However, there was a significant canopy cover effect on NO3 - -N spiraling, and directly comparing paired sets of unrestored-restored reaches showed that restoration does affect NO3 - -N spiraling after accounting for other environmental variation. Furthermore, there was a change in GPP : ER seasonality, with restored and open-canopied reaches exhibiting higher GPP : ER during summer. The restoration effect, though, appears contingent upon altered canopy cover, which is likely to be a temporary effect of restoration and is a driver of multiple ecosystem services, e.g., habitat, riparian nutrient processing. Our results suggest that decision-making about stream restoration, including evaluations of nutrient benefits, clearly needs to consider spatial and temporal dynamics of canopy cover and trade-offs among multiple ecosystem services.
© 2019 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  canopy cover; ecosystem respiration; gross primary production; restoration; spiraling; urban stream

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31155778     DOI: 10.1002/eap.1941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  2 in total

1.  Long-term ecological research and the COVID-19 anthropause: A window to understanding social-ecological disturbance.

Authors:  Evelyn E Gaiser; John S Kominoski; Diane M McKnight; Christie A Bahlai; Chingwen Cheng; Sydne Record; Wilfred M Wollheim; Kyle R Christianson; Martha R Downs; Peter A Hawman; Sally J Holbrook; Abhishek Kumar; Deepak R Mishra; Noah P Molotch; Richard B Primack; Andrew Rassweiler; Russell J Schmitt; Lori A Sutter
Journal:  Ecosphere       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.593

2.  Large spatiotemporal variability in metabolic regimes for an urban stream draining four wastewater treatment plants with implications for dissolved oxygen monitoring.

Authors:  Sarah H Ledford; Jacob S Diamond; Laura Toran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.