Literature DB >> 31155462

How should we diagnose and assess the severity of PPH in clinical trials?

Shireen Meher1.   

Abstract

Interventions for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage have been the subject of numerous clinical trials. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in the outcomes reported by trialists, making the evidence difficult to interpret and compare across studies. Recommendations for clinical practice can be robust only if they are based on good-quality evidence, where therapeutic options are compared using indicators that are standardised, important and meaningful measures of wellbeing. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the challenges in selecting outcome measures for postpartum haemorrhage trials, to describe the current state of outcomes reporting in this area and to make recommendations for clinical trials evaluating interventions for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage, based on the recently developed Core Outcome Sets.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COS; Core outcome set; Diagnosis; Outcome; PPH; Postpartum haemorrhage

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31155462     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  1 in total

1.  A study protocol for the cardiac effects of a single dose of either oxytocin 2.5 IU or carbetocin 100 µg after caesarean delivery: a prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial in Norway.

Authors:  Maria Bekkenes; Marte Morin Jørgensen; Anne Flem Jacobsen; Morten Wang Fagerland; Helene Rakstad-Larsen; Ole Geir Solberg; Lars Aaberge; Olav Klingenberg; Trude Steinsvik; Leiv Arne Rosseland
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-09-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.