Literature DB >> 31153988

Using genetic genealogy databases in missing persons cases and to develop suspect leads in violent crimes.

Debbie Kennett1.   

Abstract

In the last year direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic genealogy databases have been used to identify suspects and missing persons in over fifty cold cases, many of which have been unsolved for decades. Genealogists worked on these cases in collaboration with law enforcement agencies. Raw DNA data files were uploaded to the genealogy websites GEDmatch and FamilyTreeDNA, and identification was made by tracing the family trees of relatives who were predicted to be close genetic matches in the database. Such searches have far-reaching consequences because they affect not just those who have consented to upload their DNA results to these databases but also all of their relatives, regardless of whether or not they have taken a DNA test. This article provides an overview of the methods used, the potential privacy and security issues, and the wider implications for society. There is an urgent need for forensic scientists, bioethicists, law enforcement agencies, genetic genealogists and other interested parties to work together to produce international guidelines and policies to ensure that the techniques are used responsibly and effectively.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cold cases; DTC genetic testing; Ethics; Genetic genealogy; Genetic privacy; Security

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31153988     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  9 in total

1.  A content analysis of direct-to-consumer DNA testing on TikTok.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Joseph Fera; Nasia Quinones
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Grace C Hillyer; Lalitha Samuel; Erela Datuowei; Betty Cohn
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-10-14

Review 3.  Working the crowd for forensic research: A review of contributor motivation and recruitment strategies used in crowdsourcing and crowdfunding for scientific research.

Authors:  Rebecca Parrick; Brendan Chapman
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations.

Authors:  Kiara V Whitley; Josie A Tueller; K Scott Weber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Attacks on genetic privacy via uploads to genealogical databases.

Authors:  Michael D Edge; Graham Coop
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  The challenges of maintaining genetic privacy.

Authors:  Shai Carmi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Ethics as Lived Practice. Anticipatory Capacity and Ethical Decision-Making in Forensic Genetics.

Authors:  Matthias Wienroth; Rafaela Granja; Veronika Lipphardt; Emmanuel Nsiah Amoako; Carole McCartney
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective.

Authors:  Nina F de Groot; Britta C van Beers; Gerben Meynen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 2.903

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.