Literature DB >> 31153719

Reduced Length of Hospital Stay for Cardiac Surgery-Implementing an Optimized Perioperative Pathway: Prospective Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Designed for Mini-Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement.

Cedrick Zaouter1, Pierre Oses2, Savva Assatourian3, Louis Labrousse2, Alain Rémy3, Alexandre Ouattara4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Presently, there is enthusiasm for the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program. The literature clearly indicates this type of program could shorten hospital length of stay and improve patient outcome. However, most of the studies conducted have encompassed mainly colorectal and orthopedic surgeries. Thus, in an effort to provide more evidence to the literature, the authors prospectively investigated the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a dedicated ERAS program for mini-invasive aortic valve replacements (MIAVRs).
DESIGN: Observational before-and-after trial.
SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients scheduled for an MIAVR via a mini-sternotomy during 2 time periods-before (MIAVR group) and after implementation of an ERAS program (MIAVR-ERAS group).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients in the dedicated MIAVR-ERAS group followed a dedicated pathway specifically designed for this procedure, which encompasses several evidence-based medicine elements for cardiac surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data on patient demographics, patient characteristics, compliance to the ERAS protocol, postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative pain scores, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and hospital readmission rate were collected and compared. Twenty-three patients were enrolled in each group. Patients enrolled in the new protocol had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (p = 0.03). The median hospital length of stay was 10 (9-13.5) and 7 (6.5-8) days in the traditional MIAVR group and in the MIAVR-ERAS group, respectively (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: An ERAS pathway planned for MIAVR seems feasible and was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay with trends toward both less opioid consumption and less postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; aortic valve replacement

Year:  2019        PMID: 31153719     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  7 in total

1.  [Quod "ERAS" demonstrandum : Advantages of interdisciplinary concepts in cardiac surgery patients].

Authors:  Matthias Feuerecker
Journal:  Anaesthesiologie       Date:  2022-08-12

2.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after minimally-invasive cardiac surgery: harm or benefit?

Authors:  Angelo Carretta; Elisabetta Lapenna
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Commentary: "Get moving early!" Inpatient cardiac rehabilitation reduces unplanned hospitalizations.

Authors:  Ruth M Masterson Creber; Mario F L Gaudino
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Postsurgical Opioid Prescriptions and Risk of Long-term Use: An Observational Cohort Study Across the United States.

Authors:  Jessica C Young; Nabarun Dasgupta; Brooke A Chidgey; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 5.  Cardiac Surgery-Enhanced Recovery Programs Modified for COVID-19: Key Steps to Preserve Resources, Manage Caseload Backlog, and Improve Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander J Gregory; Michael C Grant; Edward Boyle; Rakesh C Arora; Judson B Williams; Rawn Salenger; Subhasis Chatterjee; Kevin W Lobdell; Marjan Jahangiri; Daniel T Engelman
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral perioperative care model in cardiac surgery: implementation in the setting of minimally invasive heart valve surgery (INCREASE)-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susanne G R Klotz; Gesche Ketels; Christian A Behrendt; Hans-Helmut König; Sebastian Kohlmann; Bernd Löwe; Johannes Petersen; Sina Stock; Eik Vettorazzi; Antonia Zapf; Inke Zastrow; Christian Zöllner; Hermann Reichenspurner; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 7.  Cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 sine wave: Preparation once, preparation twice. A view from Houston.

Authors:  Subhasis Chatterjee; James M Anton; Todd K Rosengart; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 1.778

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.