Literature DB >> 31153024

Lack of prospective relationships of the Power of Food Scale with Body Mass Index and dieting over 2 years in U.S. emerging adults.

Leah M Lipsky1, Tonja R Nansel2, Denise L Haynie2, Danping Liu3, Miriam H Eisenberg Colman2, Bruce Simons-Morton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated prospective relationships of the Power of Food Scale (PFS), a self-report measure of hedonic hunger, with weight outcomes and dieting in U.S. young adults.
METHODS: PFS (PFS-aggregate and subscales: PFS-available, PFS-present, PFS-tasted) was assessed in waves (W, years) 5 and 6 of a nationally representative cohort of 10th graders assessed annually (baseline n = 2785, 83% retention at W7). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), 1-year stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were examined. Analyses accounting for the complex survey design examined cross-sectional associations of W6 PFS with W6 BMI and dieting, and prospective relationships of PFS in each wave with BMI, 1-year BMI change (BMIΔ, W6-W5 and W7-W6), overweight/obesity onset (OWOB, moving to a higher risk weight category) and dieting in the following wave. Multiple imputations addressed missing data.
RESULTS: Baseline participant mean ± SE age was 20.3 ± 0.02 years. Mean BMI increased by approximately 0.6 kg/m2 from W5 through W7; OWOB occurred in 7.4% of participants between W5-W6; 9.0% between W6-W7. Approximately half the sample reported dieting in each wave. W6 weight outcomes were not associated with W6 PFS, but W6 dieting frequency was positively associated with W6 PFS-available, PFS-present, and PFS-aggregate (but not PFS-tasted) in multivariable models. PFS was not prospectively associated with weight outcomes. Positive prospective associations of PFS with dieting frequency were inconsistent across waves and with respect to inclusion of covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater PFS is associated with dieting cross-sectionally but was not a reliable indicator of susceptibility to future weight outcomes or dieting in young adults. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Cohort studies; Dieting; Nationally representative; Power of Food Scale; Young adults

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31153024      PMCID: PMC7668209          DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2019.101302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  38 in total

1.  Susceptibility to weight gain. Eating behaviour traits and physical activity as predictors of weight gain during the first year of university.

Authors:  Graham Finlayson; Joanne Cecil; Suzanne Higgs; Andrew Hill; Marion Hetherington
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Why does dieting predict weight gain in adolescents? Findings from project EAT-II: a 5-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Melanie Wall; Jess Haines; Mary Story; Marla E Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2007-03

4.  Hedonic Hunger Is Related to Increased Neural and Perceptual Responses to Cues of Palatable Food and Motivation to Consume: Evidence from 3 Independent Investigations.

Authors:  Kyle S Burger; Abigail J Sanders; Jennifer R Gilbert
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  The relation of hedonic hunger and restrained eating to lateralized frontal activation.

Authors:  S R Winter; E H Feig; J Kounios; B Erickson; S Berkowitz; M R Lowe
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-28

6.  Weight gain continues in the 1990s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults.

Authors:  C E Lewis; D R Jacobs; H McCreath; C I Kiefe; P J Schreiner; D E Smith; O D Williams
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Validation of the Japanese version of the power of food scale in a young adult population.

Authors:  Takahiro Yoshikawa; Keisuke Orita; Yasuyoshi Watanabe; Masaaki Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2012-08

8.  Greater Food Reward Sensitivity Is Associated with More Frequent Intake of Discretionary Foods in a Nationally Representative Sample of Young Adults.

Authors:  Tonja R Nansel; Leah M Lipsky; Miriam H Eisenberg; Denise L Haynie; Danping Liu; Bruce Simons-Morton
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2016-08-18

9.  Who changes body mass between adolescence and adulthood? Factors predicting change in BMI between 16 year and 30 years in the 1970 British Birth Cohort.

Authors:  R M Viner; T J Cole
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life.

Authors:  Benjamin Schüz; Natalie Schüz; Stuart G Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  2 in total

1.  Examining the ecological validity of the Power of Food Scale.

Authors:  Lindsay M Howard; Kristin E Heron; Kathryn E Smith; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; Stephen A Wonderlich; Tyler B Mason
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Reward-related eating, self-regulation, and weight change in pregnancy and postpartum: the Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study (PEAS).

Authors:  Tonja R Nansel; Leah M Lipsky; Kyle Burger; Myles Faith; Wanda Nicholson; Alison Stuebe; Aiyi Liu; Anna Maria Siega-Riz
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.095

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.