Literature DB >> 31152842

Retrieval orientation alters neural activity during autobiographical memory recollection.

Lauri Gurguryan1, Signy Sheldon2.   

Abstract

When an autobiographical memory is retrieved, the underlying memory representation is constructed by flexibly activating a broad neural network. As such, the content used to reconstruct a memory can bias activity within this neural network. Here, we tested the hypothesis that focusing on the conceptual and contextual aspects of a memory to construct a memory representation will recruit distinct neural subsystems. To test this hypothesis, we measured neural activity as participants retrieved memories under retrieval orientations that biased remembering towards these elements of a past autobiographical experience. In an MRI scanner, participants first retrieved autobiographical memories and then were re-oriented towards the conceptual or contextual elements of that memory. They then used this re-oriented content (conceptual or contextual elements) to access and elaborate upon a new autobiographical memory. Confirming our hypothesis, we found a neural dissociation between these retrieval orientation conditions that aligned with established models of memory. We also found evidence that this neural dissociation was most prominent when the re-oriented mnemonic content was used to access a new memory. Altogether, the reported results provide critical insight into how and when retrieval orientations alter neural support for autobiographical memory retrieval and inform on the neural organization of autobiographical knowledge.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autobiographical memory; Conceptual retrieval; Contextual retrieval; Retrieval orientation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31152842     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  Individual differences in the relationship between episodic detail generation and resting state functional connectivity vary with age.

Authors:  Stephanie Matijevic; Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Aubrey A Wank; Lee Ryan; Matthew D Grilli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The effect of retrieval goals on the content recalled from complex narratives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dutemple; Signy Sheldon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-08-19

3.  A Role for the Anterior Hippocampus in Autobiographical Memory Construction Regardless of Temporal Distance.

Authors:  Sam Audrain; Adrian W Gilmore; Jenna M Wilson; Daniel L Schacter; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Human hippocampal CA3 damage disrupts both recent and remote episodic memories.

Authors:  Thomas D Miller; Trevor T-J Chong; Anne M Aimola Davies; Michael R Johnson; Sarosh R Irani; Masud Husain; Tammy Wc Ng; Saiju Jacob; Paul Maddison; Christopher Kennard; Penny A Gowland; Clive R Rosenthal
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Mapping the imaginative mind: Charting new paths forward.

Authors:  Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Matthew D Grilli
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 6.  How shifting visual perspective during autobiographical memory retrieval influences emotion: A change in retrieval orientation.

Authors:  Selen Küçüktaş; Peggy L St Jacques
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Intrinsic connectivity reveals functionally distinct cortico-hippocampal networks in the human brain.

Authors:  Alexander J Barnett; Walter Reilly; Halle R Dimsdale-Zucker; Eda Mizrak; Zachariah Reagh; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  The Neural Dynamics of Individual Differences in Episodic Autobiographical Memory.

Authors:  Raluca Petrican; Daniela J Palombo; Signy Sheldon; Brian Levine
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.