Literature DB >> 31152143

Celastrol Enhances the Anti-Liver Cancer Activity of Sorafenib.

Rui Zhang1, Zhi Chen2, Shu-Sheng Wu2, Jun Xu3, Ling-Chun Kong4, Pei Wei5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Sorafenib, a multiple-target-point kinase inhibitor, has been used as a standard treatment for advanced liver cancer and has shown therapeutic benefits. However, resistance often occurs, prompting the need for identification of synergizing agents. Celastrol is a major active ingredient of Tripterygium wilfordii, which can increase the antitumor effect of traditional antitumor drugs. This work focused on the sensitization of liver cancers in use of celastrol combined with sorafenib. MATERIAL AND METHODS The IC50 values of sorafenib and celastrol on cancer cells were determined through MTT assays. The effects of sorafenib on AKT signaling and VEGF levels in sorafenib-treated cancer cells were analyzed by Western blotting and ELISA, respectively. After combined treatment with celastrol and sorafenib, the survival rate of tumor cells was determined by MTT and clonogenic assays, and the apoptosis rate was also determined by flow cytometry. In addition, the in vivo antitumor activity of celastrol combined with sorafenib was evaluated in Hepa1-6 tumor-bearing mice. RESULTS Sorafenib treatment induced the compensatory activation of the AKT pathway and autocrine VEGF in hepatoma cells, which could be reversed by celastrol. Furthermore, celastrol enhanced the growth inhibition and apoptosis induction of cancer cells by sorafenib both in vitro and in vivo and reduced the dosage of sorafenib needed. CONCLUSIONS Celastrol enhances the antitumor activity of sorafenib in HCC tumor cells by suppressing the AKT pathway and VEGF autocrine system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31152143      PMCID: PMC6559000          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.914060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Despite the development of various therapeutic strategies, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still one of the most common and fatal malignancies worldwide [1]. HCC patients are usually diagnosed at a late stage, and the tumors exhibit intrahepatic or distant organ metastasis, which is unsuitable for surgical treatment [2]. Targeted drugs are important clinical treatments for patients with liver cancer [3]. Sorafenib is a multiple-target-point kinase inhibitor approved as a first-line HCC treatment [4]. Although several large randomized controlled clinical studies have shown that sorafenib can effectively prolong the survival period of patients with liver cancer [5], the secondary drug resistance produced by long-term sorafenib therapy has become a bottleneck restricting further improvement of the efficacy of sorafenib [6,7]. Therefore, it is important to further understand the mechanism of liver cancer resistance to sorafenib and carry out molecularly targeted interventions. The mechanism of tumor cell resistance is rather complicated, in which the compensatory activation of the anticipation signaling pathway is one of the main mechanisms. As a classic signal transduction pathway, PI3K/AKT signaling participates in the regulation of multiple cell activities, such as cell proliferation [8], survival [9], and apoptosis [10]. Chen et al. found that the long-term use of sorafenib activates the PDK/AKT signaling pathway and induces sorafenib resistance in hepatoma cells [11]. Some researchers indicated that activated AKT pathway mediated cellular resistance to sorafenib, and AKT inhibitor could enhance the growth inhibition of sorafenib in hepatoma cells [12,13]. Although it seems that inhibition of the AKT pathway can significantly enhance the efficacy of sorafenib, a problem that cannot be ignored is that the PI3K/AKT pathway also plays an essential role in the physiological process [14]. Therefore, the potentially toxic adverse effects of the combination therapy may limit its clinical applications. Some natural medicinal plant components can be used as auxiliary or even alternative means for traditional or targeted therapy because of their minimal toxic adverse effects. Celastrol is a major active ingredient of Tripterygium wilfordii, and its anticancer effect has been confirmed in many types of tumors, such as breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, and glioma [15,16]. However, whether celastrol can enhance the antitumor effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma remains unknown. In this study, we focused on the inhibitory effects of sorafenib alone or in combination with celastrol on hepatoma cells. Our results showed that celastrol significantly enhanced the antitumor activity and reduce the dosage of sorafenib.

Material and Methods

Cell culture

The HCC cell lines HepG2 and Hepa1-6 were was obtained from ATCC and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and conventional concentration antibiotics. All cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.

Cell cytotoxicity assay

In vitro cytotoxicities of sorafenib and celastrol, alone or in combination, in the HCC cell lines were measured by MTT assay kit (Engene, Nanjing, China) as previously described [17]. In brief, HCC cells were plated in 96-well culture plates at a concentration of 5000 cells/well and treated with sorafenib and/or celastrol. At the indicated time points, 10 μL MTT solutions (5 mg/ml) were added and cells were then incubated for 2 h. After removing the medium, 500 μL DMSO was added to dissolve formazan crystals, and the absorbance was read at 570 nm on a Multiwell plate reader (Biotech, USA).

ELISA assay

VEGF levels in the cell culture medium supernatants were determined using human and mouse ELISA kits (NeoBioscience, Shenzhen, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, samples were added to plates (100 μL/well) supplied with the kit, and incubated at 37°C for 90 min. After washing 5 times, biotinylated antibodies were added (100 μL/well), and incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. After another round of washing, avidin-peroxidase was added (100μL/well) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Plates were then washed 5 times and reacted with 100 μL/well TMB for 15 min at room temperature. Finally, termination reagent was added, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm on a microplate reader (Biotek Instruments, USA).

Western blot

Proteins from tumor cells were extracted by RIPA lysis buffer (Keygen, Nanjing, China), separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, and subjected transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated with P-AKT (Ser473) or total AKT antibodies, followed by hybridization with the secondary HRP-conjugated antibody. Detection was performed by an enhanced chemiluminescence assay (Wanleibio, Shenyang, China).

Colony formation assay

Cancer cells were seeded in 12-well culture plates at a concentration of 1000 cells/well and then incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C. After treatment with indicated agents for 16 days, cells were stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 20 min. Colony numbers in each plate were counted using an inverted microscope.

Apoptosis assay

The apoptotic effects of sorafenib and celastrol, alone or in combination, on the HCC cell lines were measured by staining with FITCAnnexin V and propidium iodide (PI) kit (4ABio, Beijing, China) in accordance with the provided instructions, and the data were analyzed with CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

In vivo experiment

The animal experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Experimental Animal Center of Shanxi Medical University, and all the C57bl/6 mice (4–6 weeks old) used for the experiment were well fed before inoculation. Hepa1-6 single-cell suspension cells (2×107/mL) were injected subcutaneously at a volume of 0.1 mL in the right flank of each mouse. After 7 days, the skins of mice were palpable, showed bumps, and were irregularly shaped. After providing medicine randomly, the size of the subcutaneous tumor was observed regularly every 7 days. After 21 days of administration, the mice were anesthetized and killed, completely removing the transplanted tumor. The inhibition rate of tumor volume was then calculated.

Immunohistochemistry

The stripped mouse tumor blocks were fixed in 10% neutral formalin and embedded in paraffin. After slicing (with a thickness of approximately 5 μm), dewaxing, antigen retrieval, and sealing, VEGF, p-AKT, and cleaved-caspase 3 were detected using the corresponding primary antibodies. After washing, they were incubated with secondary antibodies marked with HRP or Alexa Fluor 488 (Keygene, Nanjing, China) and finally were made chromogenic in situ through DAB or observed under a fluorescence microscope.

Statistical analysis

All data were the results of 3 independent experiments, expressed as means ± s.d. The t test and single-factor ANOVA were performed using SPSS13.0 software, and P<0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

The effects of sorafenib and celastrol on HCC cell growth

To investigate the effects of sorafenib and celastrol on the hepatoma cell lines Hep G2 and Hepa1-6 growth, we performed MTT assay to detect the proliferation inhibition of different concentrations of sorafenib (0, 1, 2, 5, and 10 μmol/L) or celastrol (0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μmol/L) at different time points (24 and 48 h). As shown in Figure 1, with the increase in concentration and the prolongation of action time, the inhibitory effect of sorafenib on the proliferation of tumor cells gradually increased, in which the IC50 values of sorafenib at 48 h for Hep G2 and Hepa1-6 cells were 7.35 and 9.46 μm, respectively (Figure 1A). In the celastrol-treated group, as shown in Figure 1B, HCC cell proliferation was also inhibited in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. After treating for 48 h, the IC50 values of celastrol for HepG2 and Hepa1-6 cells were 3.37 and 2.55 μm, respectively.
Figure 1

Effects of sorafenib and celastrol on the growth of hepatoma cells. Cell viability percentages in hepatoma cells treated with various concentrations of sorafenib (A) or celastrol (B) in vitro for 24 h and 48h. The dotted lines represent the corresponding concentration of IC50.

Sorafenib enhanced VEGF autocrine and activated the AKT pathway

Activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and autocrine VEGF mediate acquired resistance to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [10,11]. Thus, we checked the P-AKT and VEGF level in tumor cells after sorafenib treatment. The results of our study showed that sorafenib single-drug therapy significantly increased the expression levels of P-AKT (Figure 2A, 2B) and VEGF (Figure 2C, 2D) compared with the control group, which indicated the activation of P-AKT and enhanced VEGF autocrine induced by sorafenib.
Figure 2

(A–F) Effects of sorafenib on the phosphorylated AKT levels in hepatoma cells. (A) After treating with indicated concentrations of sorafenib for 6 h, the HepG2 and Hepa1-6 cellular proteins were extracted and the phosphorylated and total AKT levels were detected by Western blot analysis. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01. (B) The levels of phosphorylated and total AKT were detected through Western blot analysis at different time points after treatment with 1 μm sorafenib. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01. (C) After treatment with sorafenib (1 μm) for different times, the VEGF levels in culture supernatant of hepatoma cells were detected by ELISA. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01.

Celastrol enhanced sorafenib-induced HCC cell growth inhibition and apoptosis

According to the above results, hepatoma cells were treated with 1 mol/L celastrol combined with 1 mol/L sorafenib. As shown in Figure 3, celastrol significantly enhanced the growth inhibition of sorafenib on the hepatoma cells. Under the combined action of celastrol, the inhibitory rate of sorafenib on the hepatoma cells at 48 h was increased by approximately 5 and 3 times. The effect of celastrol on the apoptosis of hepatoma cells induced by sorafenib through ANNEXIN V/PI staining was further examined. Results showed that the combined treatment significantly increased the apoptotic-staining-positive cells of the cancer cells after 48 h. The apoptosis rate of cancer cells induced by sorafenib was 2.3 and 4 times enhanced by celastrol.
Figure 3

Effects of sorafenib combined with celastrol on the growth and apoptosis of hepatoma cells. (A) After treating with control agents (equal volume of PBS), sorafenib (1 μm), celastrol (1 μm), and the same amount of sorafenib and celastrol for different time, the cell viability percentages were detected by MTT assays, ** P<0.01. (B) After treating with the above agents for 16 days, crystal violet staining to detect the number of clones formed in hepatoma cells. (C) After treating with the above agents for different time, cell apoptotic rates were analyzed by Annexin V-FITC and PI staining, ** P<0.01.

Celastrol enhanced the antitumor effect of sorafenib in vivo

To further evaluate the inhibitory activity of celastrol combined with sorafenib on hepatoma cells, Hepa1-6-cell-bearing mice were established and treated with drugs. After sorafenib or celastrol single-drug treatment, the size of the transplanted tumor was significantly reduced. This reduction was the most significant in the celastrol+sorafenib group, which reduced the volume of the transplanted tumor at a maximum value (Figure 4A, 4B). Interestingly, the results of our study showed that sorafenib single-drug therapy significantly increased the expression levels of VEGF and P-AKT compared with the control group, whereas celastrol decreased the levels of VEGF and P-AKT, suggesting that combined celastrol therapy can reverse the upregulation of VEGF and P-AKT induced by sorafenib (Figure 4C, 4D). Furthermore, the results of immunohistochemistry showed that, except for the control group, all groups displayed significant cell apoptosis after drug intervention. More cell apoptosis was observed using the combined intervention of sorafenib with celastrol (Figure 4E). These results indicate that celastrol and sorafenib can inhibit the growth of HCC tumors and increase the apoptosis of tumor cells.
Figure 4

After the administration of control agents (equal volume of PBS), celastrol (5 mg/kg), sorafenib (6 mg/kg), or a combination of the same amount of the celastrol and sorafenib, the effects of combined therapy on the growth of Hepa1-6 transplanted tumor in C57bl/6 mice. (A) The tumor sizes in all groups were measured at the end of drug administration, ** P<0.01. (B) The tumors of mice in all groups were weighed at the end of drug administration, ** P<0.01. (C) The VEGF levels in mice serum were measured by ELISA at the end of drug administration, ** P<0.01. IHC was used to detect the expressions of p-AKT (D) and cleaved-caspase 3 (E) in tumor tissue sections, bar=100 μm, ** P<0.01.

Discussion

Sorafenib is a first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma that can improve the survival of patients. However, although the patient’s initial clinical response to the treatment had a certain effect, the long-term use of sorafenib has obvious adverse effects and drug resistance [18-20]. Combined therapy, as an important clinical medication in recent years, has the advantages of enhancing the efficacy, reducing the dosage, and lowering the toxicity of a single drug, as well as effectively slowing drug resistance. Thus, researchers seek drugs that can effectively enhance the efficacy of sorafenib for combination therapy. Celastrol is one of the main active components of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F that has a wide range of biological functions, such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, cholesterol-reducing, antitumor, and other pharmacological effects [21]. Many studies have shown that celastrol can inhibit the growth of multiple tumors in vivo and in vitro. It has a wide range of targets that can regulate apoptosis-related signaling pathways [22], inhibit the growth-factor-mediated signaling pathway [23], and reduce the release of growth and angiogenic factors [24]. Importantly, celastrol increases the antitumor effect of traditional antitumor drugs or targeted antitumor drugs, reversing the resistance of tumor cells to multiple drugs [25,26]. In the present work, we assessed the feasibility of combining celastrol to enhance sorafenib and reduce its dosage. Consistent with our expectations, celastrol significantly enhanced the growth inhibition of sorafenib on a variety of hepatoma cells, both in vivo and in vitro; suggesting that combined therapy can be widely used for liver cancer. Under the action of sorafenib with the same concentration, celastrol can increase its antitumor activity by more than 5 times. The significant inhibitory effect was manifested in a significant decline in the tumor proliferation index, indicating one of the mechanisms by which combined therapy achieved strong suppression of the proliferation of hepatoma cells. Anti-cancer drugs are prone to exhibit drug resistance after long-term administration. However, the inhibitory effect of liver cancer in this study, especially in vivo, did not decrease with time, indicating the stability of combined therapy to a certain extent. In particular, we observed that, compared with sorafenib monotherapy, combined celastrol can cause more intense apoptotic death in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Notably, sorafenib can activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in hepatoma cells while achieving certain therapeutic effects. As a classic signal transduction pathway against apoptosis and promoting survival, the PI3K/AKT pathway participates in the regulation of multiple cell activities and plays an unusual role in tumor-targeted drug resistance [27]. Other studies have also confirmed that AKT is involved in the drug resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib. Therefore, the strong suppression of sorafenib-induced AKT activation by celastrol is probably one of the major causes for the higher apoptosis rate induced by combination therapy. The complexity of the mechanism of tumor resistance is reflected in the release of multiple growth factors in addition to compensatory activation in the regulation of anti-apoptosis and survival-related signaling pathways [28,29]. We also found that sorafenib increased the secretion of VEGF in tumor cells, and the increased VEGF undoubtedly helped cancer cells to resist sorafenib therapy. However, celastrol can inhibit the secretion of VEGF, which further enhances the efficacy of sorafenib. Whether increased VEGF is regulated by activated AKT and whether celastrol can inhibit VEGF secretion by inhibiting the AKT pathway requires further confirmation. Surprisingly, celastrol can enhance the efficacy of sorafenib while reducing its dosage. The limited clinical efficacy of sorafenib is also due to the adverse effect of long-term medication, including circulatory system, skin reaction, and gastrointestinal reaction. Although some targeted drugs, such as AKT pathway inhibitors, can enhance the antitumor effect of sorafenib, the targets of these drugs also play important physiological functions in the body, and the potential hazards caused by their oversuppression need further research. In view of the widespread targets and low toxicity of celastrol, the combined strategy with sorafenib is an effective and safe treatment.

Conclusions

Overall, our study shows that sorafenib monotherapy can trigger the compensatory activation of the AKT pathway and over-secrete VEGF, which can be reversed by celastrol, leading to better treatment results. Low-dose sorafenib combined with celastrol exhibited a strong therapeutic potential in the cell model of hepatocellular carcinoma, accompanied by a significant pro-apoptotic effect. However, further research is needed to better understand the antitumor mechanism and safety of this combination therapy.
  29 in total

1.  Celastrol inhibits vasculogenesis by suppressing the VEGF-induced functional activity of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells.

Authors:  Shuai Huang; Yubo Tang; Xingdong Cai; Xinsheng Peng; Xingmo Liu; Longjuan Zhang; Yucheng Xiang; Dechun Wang; Xi Wang; Tao Pan
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  PI3K/Akt: getting it right matters.

Authors:  T F Franke
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Autophagy control by the VEGF-C/NRP-2 axis in cancer and its implication for treatment resistance.

Authors:  Marissa J Stanton; Samikshan Dutta; Heyu Zhang; Navatha S Polavaram; Alexey A Leontovich; Pia Hönscheid; Frank A Sinicrope; Donald J Tindall; Michael H Muders; Kaustubh Datta
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway mediates acquired resistance to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Kuen-Feng Chen; Hui-Ling Chen; Wei-Tien Tai; Wen-Chi Feng; Chih-Hung Hsu; Pei-Jer Chen; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 5.  Molecular targets of celastrol derived from Thunder of God Vine: potential role in the treatment of inflammatory disorders and cancer.

Authors:  Radhamani Kannaiyan; Muthu K Shanmugam; Gautam Sethi
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Efficiency and side effects of sorafenib therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study by the anatolian society of medical oncology.

Authors:  Veli Berk; Mehmet Ali Kaplan; Onder Tonyali; Suleyman Buyukberber; Ozan Balakan; Metin Ozkan; Umut Demirci; Turkan Ozturk; Ahmet Bilici; Didem Tastekin; Nuriye Ozdemir; Olcun Umit Unal; Utku Oflazoglu; Esma Turkmen; Bulent Erdogan; Ummugul Uyeturk; Berna Oksuzoglu; Havva Yesil Cinkir; Nurgul Yasar; Mahmut Gumus
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

Review 7.  The VEGF pathway in cancer and disease: responses, resistance, and the path forward.

Authors:  Mark W Kieran; Raghu Kalluri; Yoon-Jae Cho
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Inhibition of Akt reverses the acquired resistance to sorafenib by switching protective autophagy to autophagic cell death in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Zhai; Fengli Hu; Xian Jiang; Jun Xu; Dali Zhao; Bing Liu; Shangha Pan; Xuesong Dong; Gang Tan; Zheng Wei; Haiquan Qiao; Hongchi Jiang; Xueying Sun
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 9.  [Targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinomas: recent results and future development].

Authors:  H Marijon; S Faivre; E Raymond
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.276

10.  The NF-kappa B inhibitor, celastrol, could enhance the anti-cancer effect of gambogic acid on oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Di He; Qin Xu; Ming Yan; Ping Zhang; Xiaojian Zhou; Zhiyuan Zhang; Wenhu Duan; Laiping Zhong; Dongxia Ye; Wantao Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  10 in total

1.  Celastrol inhibits ezrin-mediated migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Shihao Du; Xiaoyu Song; Yuan Li; Yalei Cao; Fuhao Chu; Olanrewaju Ayodeji Durojaye; Zeqi Su; Xiaoguang Shi; Jing Wang; Juan Cheng; Tangshun Wang; Xiang Gao; Yan Chen; Wuzhekai Zeng; Fengsong Wang; DongMei Wang; Xing Liu; Xia Ding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Celastrol: A Review of Useful Strategies Overcoming its Limitation in Anticancer Application.

Authors:  Jinfeng Shi; Jiaxin Li; Ziyi Xu; Liang Chen; Ruifeng Luo; Chen Zhang; Fei Gao; Jinming Zhang; Chaomei Fu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Natural product remedies for COVID-19: A focus on safety.

Authors:  Aitebiremen Gift Omokhua-Uyi; Johannes Van Staden
Journal:  S Afr J Bot       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.315

4.  Brassinin Inhibits Proliferation in Human Liver Cancer Cells via Mitochondrial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Taeyeon Hong; Jiyeon Ham; Jisoo Song; Gwonhwa Song; Whasun Lim
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Comprehensive Analysis of Tripterine Anti-Ovarian Cancer Effects Using Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis and Molecular Docking.

Authors:  Xi Long; Leping Liu; Qinyu Zhao; Xinyi Xu; Pingan Liu; Guoming Zhang; Jie Lin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 6.  Celastrol: An Update on Its Hepatoprotective Properties and the Linked Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Mengzhen Li; Faren Xie; Lu Wang; Guoxue Zhu; Lian-Wen Qi; Shujun Jiang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 7.  Frontier progress of the combination of modern medicine and traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Lai Wei; Zeyu Wang; Niancai Jing; Yi Lu; Jili Yang; Hongyu Xiao; Huanyu Guo; Shoukun Sun; Mingjing Li; Daqing Zhao; Xiangyan Li; Wenxiu Qi; Yue Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 8.  Small Molecule Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Advances and Challenges.

Authors:  Monica A Kamal; Yasmine M Mandour; Mostafa K Abd El-Aziz; Ulrike Stein; Hend M El Tayebi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  The Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Losartan Sensitizes Human Liver Cancer Cells to Lenvatinib-Mediated Cytostatic and Angiostatic Effects.

Authors:  Hirotetsu Takagi; Kosuke Kaji; Norihisa Nishimura; Koji Ishida; Hiroyuki Ogawa; Hiroaki Takaya; Hideto Kawaratani; Kei Moriya; Tadashi Namisaki; Takemi Akahane; Akira Mitoro; Hitoshi Yoshiji
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Ferroptosis inducer erastin sensitizes NSCLC cells to celastrol through activation of the ROS-mitochondrial fission-mitophagy axis.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Yumei Fan; Danyu Li; Bihui Han; Yanxiu Meng; Fei Chen; Tianchan Liu; Zhiyuan Song; Yu Han; Liying Huang; Yanzhong Chang; Pengxiu Cao; Akira Nakai; Ke Tan
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.603

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.