Literature DB >> 31151872

Is xenon a suitable euthanasia agent for mice?

Thomas C Gent1, Alexei L Vyssotski2, Carlotta Detotto3, Sarah Isler4, Martin Wehrle4, Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare behavioural and electrophysiological variables of mice undergoing gas euthanasia with either xenon (Xe) or carbon dioxide (CO2). STUDY
DESIGN: Single animals chronically instrumented for electroencephalography (EEG) recording were randomized to undergo euthanasia with either CO2 or Xe (n = 6 animals per group). ANIMALS: Twelve adult (>6 weeks old) male C57Bl6/n mice.
METHODS: Mice were surgically instrumented with EEG and electromyogram electrodes. Following a 7-day recovery period, animals were placed individually in a sealed chamber and a 5-minute baseline recorded in 21% O2. Gas [100% Xe (n = 6) or 100% CO2 (n = 6)] was then added to the chamber at 30% chamber volume minute-1 (2.8 L minute-1) until cessation of breathing. EEG, behaviour (jumping and freezing) and locomotion speed were recorded throughout.
RESULTS: Mice undergoing single gas euthanasia with Xe did not show jumping or freezing behaviours and had reduced locomotion speed compared to baseline, in contrast to CO2, which resulted in increases in these variables. EEG recordings revealed sedative effects from Xe but heightened arousal from CO2.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that Xe may be less aversive than CO2 when using a 30% chamber volume minute-1 fill rate and could improve the welfare of mice undergoing gas euthanasia.
Copyright © 2019 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; animal welfare; carbon dioxide; euthanasia; inert gases; mice

Year:  2019        PMID: 31151872     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg        ISSN: 1467-2987            Impact factor:   1.648


  1 in total

1.  Humanely Ending the Life of Animals: Research Priorities to Identify Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Aline R Steiner; Shannon Axiak Flammer; Ngaio J Beausoleil; Charlotte Berg; Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger; Rebeca García Pinillos; Huw D W Golledge; Michael Marahrens; Robert Meyer; Tobias Schnitzer; Michael J Toscano; Patricia V Turner; Daniel M Weary; Thomas C Gent
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.