| Literature DB >> 31151465 |
Michihiro Igarashi1, Shujiro Okuda2.
Abstract
The growth cone is essential for nerve growth and axon regeneration, which directly form and rearrange the neural network. Recently, to clarify the molecular signaling pathways in the growth cone that utilize protein phosphorylation, we performed a phosphoproteomics study of mammalian growth cone membranes derived from the developing rodent brain and identified > 30,000 phosphopeptides from ~ 1200 proteins. We found that the phosphorylation sites were highly proline directed and primarily mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) dependent, due to particular activation of c-jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK), a member of the MAPK family. Because the MAPK/JNK pathway is also involved in axon regeneration of invertebrate model organisms such Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, we performed evolutionary bioinformatics analysis of the mammalian growth cone phosphorylation sites. Although these sites were generally conserved within vertebrates, they were not necessarily conserved in these invertebrate model organisms. In particular, high-frequency phosphorylation sites (> 20 times) were less conserved than low-frequency sites. Taken together, the mammalian growth cones contain a large number of vertebrate-specific phosphorylation sites and stronger dependence upon MAPK/JNK than C. elegans or Drosophila. We conclude that axon growth/regeneration likely involves many vertebrate-specific phosphorylation sites.Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; C. elegans; Drosophila; Evolution; Growth cone; MAPK; Phosphoproteomics; Vertebrates
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31151465 PMCID: PMC6545026 DOI: 10.1186/s13041-019-0476-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Brain ISSN: 1756-6606 Impact factor: 4.041
Fig. 1Evolutionary analysis of phosphosites in mammalian GCM using bioinformatics. a Distribution of kinases for P-directed phosphosites that were more conserved in vertebrates (left) than in invertebrates (right). Invertebrates: C. elegans and Drosophila; Vertebrates: lamprey, zebrafish, Xenopus, turtle, anole, chicken, and rat. The numbers on the bottom indicate the frequency of the identified phosphopeptide. CK1, CK2, GSK-3, CDK, and MAPK were predicted by KinasePhos 2.0 against phosphosites conserved in vertebrates to be higher than each phosphoproteomics score threshold. Note that the predicted MAPK-dependent sites were consistently evolutionarily conserved in vertebrates and accounted for more than 35% of all sites. In the high-score groups (≥20 phosphopeptides), the proportion of MAPK phosphorylation sites conserved in invertebrates was markedly lower. b Comparison of vertebrates and invertebrates regarding MAPK P-directed phosphosites (left) and MAPK P-directed phosphosite genes (right). I-I: the gene has emerged since invertebrates, and the protein has conserved SP/TP residues since invertebrates; V-I: the gene has emerged since invertebrates, but the protein has conserved SP/TP residues only in vertebrates; and V-V: the gene emerged first in vertebrates, and the protein has conserved SP/TP residues within vertebrates. The P-directed phosphosites with a high score that were phosphorylated by MAPK were conserved in vertebrates as both a phosphosite and also a gene. See the text. Note that as the phosphorylation scores increased in vertebrates, vertebrate-specific genes with highly MAPK-dependent sites (≥20 phosphopeptides) increased. The number with the detected frequency for each phosphopeptide is shown at the bottom (a and b)