| Literature DB >> 31149636 |
Ewart Kuijk1, Francis Blokzijl1,2, Myrthe Jager1, Nicolle Besselink1, Sander Boymans1, Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes3, Ruben van Boxtel2,4, Edwin Cuppen1,5.
Abstract
A developing human fetus needs to balance rapid cellular expansion with maintaining genomic stability. Here, we accurately quantified and characterized somatic mutation accumulation in fetal tissues by analyzing individual stem cells from human fetal liver and intestine. Fetal mutation rates were about fivefold higher than in tissue-matched adult stem cells. The mutational landscape of fetal intestinal stem cells resembled that of adult intestinal stem cells, while the mutation spectrum of fetal liver stem cells is distinct from stem cells of the fetal intestine and the adult liver. Our analyses indicate that variation in mutational mechanisms, including oxidative stress and spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosines, contributes to the observed divergence in mutation accumulation patterns and drives genetic mosaicism in humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31149636 PMCID: PMC6541467 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw1271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Mutation accumulation in SCs of the human fetal liver and intestine.
(A) Left panel: Number of somatic base substitutions in each intestinal fetal SC (extrapolated to the whole autosomal genome). Right panel: Number of somatic base substitutions in each liver fetal SC (extrapolated to the whole autosomal genome) as a function of the estimated fetal age in weeks after conception. Colors indicate the different fetuses. (B) Number of somatic base substitutions that accumulated per week during life in SCs of adult and fetal liver and intestine. Each SC is represented by a data point. (C) Genomic location of somatic base substitutions for adults and fetuses per indicated cell type. CDS, coding sequence.
Fig. 2The fetal liver and fetal intestine have distinct mutational patterns.
(A) Mutation spectra for all tissues and ages. Error bars represent SDs. The total number of identified somatic base substitutions per spectrum is indicated. (B) Cosine similarities between the average 96-type mutational profiles of liver and intestinal SCs from fetal and adult origin. (C) Relative contribution of the COSMIC signatures to the different SC types that have been analyzed in the current study. (D) Cosine similarity heat map between the COSMIC signatures and the mutational profiles of the adult and fetal SCs. Samples are grouped by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. (E) Relative contribution heat map of the COSMIC signatures to the mutational profiles of the adult and fetal SCs. Samples are grouped by unsupervised hierarchical clustering.
Fig. 3RNA expression analysis.
(A) Principal components analysis of the gene expression profiles. The individual samples are projected onto the first two principal components. PC1, principal component 1; PC2, principal component 2. (B) Gene expression heat map of the top 100 differentially expressed genes between adult and fetal liver and intestinal SCs. Genes are ordered by nonsupervised hierarchical clustering.