| Literature DB >> 31149010 |
Sharma Prachi1, Solanki Jitender1, Choudhary Rahul2, Khetan Jitendra3, Mishra Priyanka1, Shah Disha4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptives pills (OCPs) are common and a convenient form of contraception. The use of hormonal contraceptives by women has been considered to influence gingival and periodontal disease progression. AIM: This study was conducted to assess the effect of oral contraceptive pills on the periodontal health. MATERIALS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Oral contraceptive; community periodontal index; loss of attachment; periodontal health
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31149010 PMCID: PMC6531981 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.56
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
Mean difference between CPI and LOA in both the groups
| Test Value = 0 | ||||||
| t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | Mean Difference | 95% Confidence Interval of the | ||
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| CPI | 23.782 | 199 | .000 | 1.75000 | 1.6049 | 1.8951 |
| LOA | 6.916 | 199 | .000 | .23500 | .1680 | .3020 |
One-Sample t-Test
Effect of oral contraceptive on periodontal health (CPI) with duration of OCP use
| Duration of intake (Months) | Total | x2# | P## value | ||||||||
| 6.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 12.00 | 15.00 | 18.00 | 24.00 | 36.00 | ||||
| 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 3(8.82%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 3 | 75.11 | 0.00 | |
| 1(33.33%) | 5(62.5%) | 0(0.00%) | 4(11.76%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 0(0.00%) | 10 | |||
| 2(66.66%) | 3(37.5%) | 7(100%) | 8(23.5%) | 2(100%) | 0(0.00%) | 12(42.85%) | 6(37.5%) | ||||
Effect of oral contraceptive on periodontal health (LOA) with duration of OCP use
| Duration of intake | Total | x2 | p | ||||||||
| 6.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 12.00 | 15.00 | 18.00 | 24.00 | 36.00 | ||||
| 3 | 8 | 7 | 29 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 5 | 72 | 27.78 | 0.00 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 11 | 28 | |||
| 3 | 8 | 7 | 34 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 16 | 100 | |||
LOA= Loss of attachment,
x2= Chi-square test,
p < 0.05 (significant),
HS= highly significant
| Scoring | criterion for CPI |
| Healthy | |
| Bleeding On Probing | |
| Calculus detected, but all the black band visible | |
| Pocket 4–5 (gingival margin within black band visible) | |
| Pocket 6mm or more (Black band not visible) | |
| Excluded sextant | |
| 9 | Not recorded |
| Scoring | criterion for CPI |
| 0 | Loss of attachment 0–3mm(CEJ not visible & CPI score 0–3 |
| If the CEJ is not visible & the CPI score is 4, or if the CEJ is visible | |
| 1 | Loss of attachment is 4–5mm(CEJ within the black band |
| 2 | Loss of attachment is 6–8mm(CEJ between the upper limit of the black |
| 3 | Loss of attachment 9–12mm(CEJ between the 8.5mm & 11.5mm rings |
| 4 | Loss of attachment 12mm or more |
| X | Excluded sextant (Less than two teeth present |
| 9 | Not recorded (CEJ neither visible nor detectable) |