| Literature DB >> 31148974 |
Louis Odeigah1, Shittu O Rasaki1, Ajayi F Ajibola2, Ameen A Hafsat3, Abdullateef G Sule4, Yusuf Musah5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The consequences of high risk sexual practices (HRSP) are enormous among adolescent senior secondary school students. They therefore need to have sufficient knowledge of HRSP. AIMEntities:
Keywords: Knowledge; Nigeria; attitude; high risk sexual practices; perception
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31148974 PMCID: PMC6531970 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
frequency distribution of respondents showing socio-demographic data
| Socio-demographic Characterisitcs | Frequency | Percentage |
| 10–15 | 131 | 29.9 |
| 16–20 | 305 | 69.6 |
| 21–24 | 2 | 0.5 |
| SSI | 175 | 40.0 |
| SSII | 172 | 39.3 |
| SSIII | 91 | 20.7 |
| MALE | 254 | 58.0 |
| FEMALE | 184 | 42.0 |
| CHRISTIANITY | 219 | 50.0 |
| ISLAM | 216 | 49.3 |
| OTHERS | 3 | 0.7 |
| YORUBA | 342 | 78.1 |
| HAUSA | 25 | 5.7 |
| IGBO | 20 | 4.6 |
| OTHERS | 51 | 11.6 |
| 1–5 | 118 | 26.9 |
| 6–10 | 285 | 65.1 |
| 11–ABOVE | 35 | 8.0 |
Mean Age ± S.D. = 16.23 ±4.75 Median = 16.31 Mode = 16
frequency distribution of respondents' knowledge on high risk sexual practices
| High risk sexual practice | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
| Yes | 271 | 61.9 |
| No | 167 | 38.1 |
| Yes | 328 | 61.9 |
| No | 167 | 38.1 |
| Yes | 321 | 73.3 |
| No | 117 | 26.7 |
| Yes | 316 | 72.1 |
| No | 122 | 27.9 |
| Yes | 288 | 65.8 |
| No | 150 | 34.2 |
| Yes | 282 | 64.4 |
| No | 156 | 35.7 |
| Yes | 287 | 65.5 |
| No | 151 | 34.4 |
| Yes | 305 | 69.6 |
| No | 133 | 30.4 |
| Yes | 308 | 70.3 |
| No | 130 | 29.7 |
frequency distribution of respondents' knowledge score on high risk sexual practices
| Score | Frequency (Percentage) | Cumulative Percentage |
| 101(23.1) | 23.1 | |
| 52 (11.9) | 34.9 | |
| 285 (65.1) | 100.0 | |
| 438(100.0) |
frequency distribution of respondents' perception towards high risk sexual practices
| Response | Yes (%) | No (%) | Indifferent |
| (%) | |||
| 144 (32.9) | 277 (63.4) | 17 (3.9) | |
| 56 (12.8) | 373 (85.2) | 9 (2.1) | |
| 209 (47.7) | 208 (47.5) | 21 (4.8) | |
| 302 (68.9) | 126 (28.8) | 10 (23) | |
| 323 (73.7) | 102 (23.3) | 13 (3.0) | |
| 319 (72.8) | 108 (24.7) | 11 (2.5) | |
| 67 (15.3) | 355 (81.1) | 16 (3.6) | |
| 353 (80.5) | 76 (17.4) | 9 (2.1) | |
| 48 (11.0) | 387 (88.4) | 3 (0.7) | |
frequency distribution and chi-square significance of respondents on knowledge level on high risk sexual practices and socio-demographic characteristics
| Variables | Poor | Fair knowledge | Good | Chi-square | P-value |
| Knowledge (%) | (%) | knowledge | value | ||
| (%) | |||||
| 10–15 | 4 (3.1) | 42 (32.1) | 85 (64.8) | 7.143 | 0.129 |
| 16–20 | 3 (1.0) | 72 (23.6) | 230 (75.4) | ||
| 21–24 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (100.0) | ||
| Male | 3 (1.2) | 77 (30.3) | 174 (68.5) | 6.180 | 0.045 |
| Female | 4 (2.2) | 37 (20.1) | 143 (77.7) | ||
| Poor | 2 (2.0) | 33 (32.7) | 66 (65.3) | 4.731 | 0.316 |
| Fair | 0 (0.0) | 15 (28.8) | 37 (71.2) | ||
| Good | 5 (1.8) | 66 (23.2) | 214 (75.0) |
| SCHOOL | Number of SS1 | Number of SS2 | Number of SS3 | Total number of |
| School 1 | 372 | 329 | 98 | 799 |
| School 2 | 111 | 142 | 90 | 343 |
| School 3 | 345 | 340 | 200 | 885 |
| School 4 | 57 | 54 | 31 | 142 |
| School 5 | 283 | 374 | 279 | 936 |
| School 6 | 111 | 129 | 90 | 320 |
| School 7 | 248 | 274 | 122 | 644 |
| School 8 | 417 | 306 | 196 | 919 |
| School 9 | 307 | 269 | 93 | 669 |
| School 10 | 307 | 277 | 97 | 681 |
Total Population of Senior Secondary School Students = 6348.
The Sample Size = 450
Total number of students in each school is shown in the table above
Formula:
Total number of students in each school × sample size
Total Population of senior secondary school students