Ingrid K Hals1,2, Hanne Fiskvik Fleiner3, Nina Reimers1, Marianne C Astor4, Karin Filipsson5, Zuheng Ma6, Valdemar Grill2, Anneli Björklund6. 1. Department of Endocrinology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 2. Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 4. Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 5. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. 6. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
AIMS: To compare outcomes of glucagon-stimulated C-peptide tests (GSCTs) in people with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) after a 21-month intervention with either insulin or the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 64 glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibody-positive individuals, who were diagnosed with diabetes <3years before the study, aged 30 to 70 years, and without clinical need for insulin treatment. We stratified participants by age and body mass index (BMI) and evaluated β-cell function by GSCT after a 48-hour temporary withdrawal of study medication. RESULTS: Age at randomization (mean 53 years), BMI (mean 27 kg/m2 ) and metabolic markers were similar between treatment arms. Glycated haemoglobin concentrations during intervention did not differ between arms. Fasting C-peptide concentrations after the intervention were similar, as were stimulated C-peptide levels (0.82 ± 0.63 nmol/L after insulin, 0.82 ± 0.46 nmol/L after sitagliptin; nonsignificant). Autoimmunity in the study population (estimated from GAD antibody titres and positivity/no positivity for zinc transporter 8 and islet antigen 2 antibodies) affected the evolution of the GSCT results significantly, which deteriorated in participants with high but not in those with low autoimmunity. Adjustment using analysis of covariance for the degree of autoimmunity did not alter the findings of no difference between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: β-cell function after intervention was similar in patients with insulin- and sitagliptin-treated LADA, regardless of the strength of autoimmunity. Further, participants with low levels of GAD antibodies did not experience progressive deterioration of β-cell function over a 21-month period. Taken together, these findings could be useful for clinicians' choices of treatment in people with LADA.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To compare outcomes of glucagon-stimulated C-peptide tests (GSCTs) in people with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) after a 21-month intervention with either insulin or the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 64 glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibody-positive individuals, who were diagnosed with diabetes <3 years before the study, aged 30 to 70 years, and without clinical need for insulin treatment. We stratified participants by age and body mass index (BMI) and evaluated β-cell function by GSCT after a 48-hour temporary withdrawal of study medication. RESULTS: Age at randomization (mean 53 years), BMI (mean 27 kg/m2 ) and metabolic markers were similar between treatment arms. Glycated haemoglobin concentrations during intervention did not differ between arms. Fasting C-peptide concentrations after the intervention were similar, as were stimulated C-peptide levels (0.82 ± 0.63 nmol/L after insulin, 0.82 ± 0.46 nmol/L after sitagliptin; nonsignificant). Autoimmunity in the study population (estimated from GAD antibody titres and positivity/no positivity for zinc transporter 8 and islet antigen 2 antibodies) affected the evolution of the GSCT results significantly, which deteriorated in participants with high but not in those with low autoimmunity. Adjustment using analysis of covariance for the degree of autoimmunity did not alter the findings of no difference between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: β-cell function after intervention was similar in patients with insulin- and sitagliptin-treated LADA, regardless of the strength of autoimmunity. Further, participants with low levels of GAD antibodies did not experience progressive deterioration of β-cell function over a 21-month period. Taken together, these findings could be useful for clinicians' choices of treatment in people with LADA.
Authors: Raffaella Buzzetti; Ernesto Maddaloni; Jason Gaglia; R David Leslie; F Susan Wong; Bernhard O Boehm Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 65.038