| Literature DB >> 31147888 |
Amar Azad1,2, Giulia Poloni1, Naeramit Sontayananon1, He Jiang1, Katja Gehmlich3,4.
Abstract
Titin, the largest protein known, has attracted a lot of interest in the cardiovascular field in recent years, since the discovery that truncating variants in titin are commonly found in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. This review will discuss the contribution of variants in titin to inherited cardiac conditions (cardiomyopathies) and how model systems, such as animals and cellular systems, can help to provide insights into underlying disease mechanisms. It will also give an outlook onto exciting technological developments, such as in the field of CRISPR, which may facilitate future research on titin variants and their contributions to cardiomyopathies.Entities:
Keywords: Animal models; CRISPR/Cas9; Cardiomyopathy; Genome-engineering; Induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes; Titin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31147888 PMCID: PMC6726704 DOI: 10.1007/s10974-019-09518-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Muscle Res Cell Motil ISSN: 0142-4319 Impact factor: 2.698
Fig. 1Schematic drawing of the sarcomere. Each titin molecule (black) spans half the sarcomere from the Z-disc to the M-band, linking thin filaments (bold black) and thick filaments (grey). The positions of I-band and A-band are also indicated. Bottom: The amino-terminus (N) and the carboxy-terminus (C) of an individual titin molecule are marked (bottom of figure). The A-band portion of titin as a hotspot for DCM-causing variants is indicated. For more detailed schemes of titin domain structure please see Bang et al. (2001), Lange et al. (2006)
Online resources to evaluate titin variants
| Name | Link | References |
|---|---|---|
| Titin variants in dilated cardiomyopathy |
| Roberts et al. ( |
| Leiden open variation database |
| Fokkema et al. ( |
| Genome aggregation database |
| Karczewski et al. ( |
| Titindb |
| Laddach et al. ( |
Fig. 2Immature phenotype of iPSC-CM in conventional 2D cultures: Normal Kolf2 iPSC (Streeter et al. 2017) were differentiated into iPSC-CMs using standard methods (Burridge et al. 2015) and plated on day 20 on different substrates: matrigel coated glass (top left), matrigel coated hydrogel (top right, 7 kPa) and nano-patterned matrigel coated hydrogel (bottom left, see Ribeiro et al. (2015)). 30 days after induction of differentiation, cells were fixed and sarcomeric structures visualised with an antibody direct against alpha-actinin (EA53, Sigma). For comparison, an isolated mouse cardiomyocyte stained with the same antibody is shown (bottom right). Scale bars represent 10 microns