N Wiesner1, R M Dutescu1, D Uthoff1, A Kottek2, M Reim3, N Schrage4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology Cologne Merheim, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. 2. , Aachen, Germany. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, D-52057, Aachen, Germany. 4. Department of Ophthalmology Cologne Merheim, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. schragen@kliniken-Koeln.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is currently uncertainty about the most efficacious decontamination solution for corrosive chemical eye burns. This 30-year longitudinal study evaluated the relative efficacy of two different decontamination methods. Passive decontamination consists of rinsing with tap water, 0.9% normal saline, isotonic buffered phosphate solution, or Ringer's lactate. Active decontamination adds an amphoteric, polyvalent, and chelating component with Previn® (Diphoterine®) solution (Laboratoire Prevor, Valmondois, France). METHODS: A prospective evaluation of patients treated in two specialized eye clinics for eye burns was begun in 1988. Recorded data included exposure circumstances, type of corrosive, different types of first therapy, and clinical treatment and outcome. Patients were treated from clinic admission and up to 24 h after the corrosive chemical burn with rinsing for 15 min using two different protocols. From 1988 to 2005, sterile 0.9% normal saline or Ringer's lactate was used. Since 2006, sterile, hypertonic, amphoteric Previn® solution was used. Comparative statistical analysis was done with the Fisher contingency tables and Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: There were a total of 1495 patients with 2194 chemically burned eyes. In 1988-2005, the annual incidence was 66.1/year; in 2006-2017, it was 65.5/year. Similar incidences were noted when initial rinsing was with tap water or isotonic buffered phosphate solutions. There was a significantly more severe outcome of corrosive chemical eye burns with any first aid rinsing solutions other than Previn® solution or tap water was used (p < 0.001). Previn® solution or tap water rinsing in the pre-hospital setting and secondary rinsing with Previn® solution in the hospital decreased lesion severity in comparison with all other rinsing solutions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The frequency of corrosive chemical eye burns was comparatively high despite tightening of occupational health and safety regulations over the past 30 years. The severity of corrosive chemical eye burns has been dramatically decreased since the introduction of Previn® solution for initial and secondary rinsing. A new protocol for immediate Previn® solution use by the Cologne Fire Brigade and secondary Previn® solution rinsing in hospital has reduced the frequency of severe corrosive chemical eye burns to less than 60% as compared to the period of 1988-2005 when other rinsing solutions were utilized.
PURPOSE: There is currently uncertainty about the most efficacious decontamination solution for corrosive chemical eye burns. This 30-year longitudinal study evaluated the relative efficacy of two different decontamination methods. Passive decontamination consists of rinsing with tapwater, 0.9% normal saline, isotonic buffered phosphate solution, or Ringer's lactate. Active decontamination adds an amphoteric, polyvalent, and chelating component with Previn® (Diphoterine®) solution (Laboratoire Prevor, Valmondois, France). METHODS: A prospective evaluation of patients treated in two specialized eye clinics for eye burns was begun in 1988. Recorded data included exposure circumstances, type of corrosive, different types of first therapy, and clinical treatment and outcome. Patients were treated from clinic admission and up to 24 h after the corrosive chemical burn with rinsing for 15 min using two different protocols. From 1988 to 2005, sterile 0.9% normal saline or Ringer's lactate was used. Since 2006, sterile, hypertonic, amphoteric Previn® solution was used. Comparative statistical analysis was done with the Fisher contingency tables and Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: There were a total of 1495 patients with 2194 chemically burned eyes. In 1988-2005, the annual incidence was 66.1/year; in 2006-2017, it was 65.5/year. Similar incidences were noted when initial rinsing was with tapwater or isotonic buffered phosphate solutions. There was a significantly more severe outcome of corrosive chemical eye burns with any first aid rinsing solutions other than Previn® solution or tapwater was used (p < 0.001). Previn® solution or tapwater rinsing in the pre-hospital setting and secondary rinsing with Previn® solution in the hospital decreased lesion severity in comparison with all other rinsing solutions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The frequency of corrosive chemical eye burns was comparatively high despite tightening of occupational health and safety regulations over the past 30 years. The severity of corrosive chemical eye burns has been dramatically decreased since the introduction of Previn® solution for initial and secondary rinsing. A new protocol for immediate Previn® solution use by the Cologne Fire Brigade and secondary Previn® solution rinsing in hospital has reduced the frequency of severe corrosive chemical eye burns to less than 60% as compared to the period of 1988-2005 when other rinsing solutions were utilized.
Entities:
Keywords:
Amphoteric solution; Corrosive chemical eye burns; Decontamination; Electrolyte solutions; Eye burns; Isotonic buffered phosphate; Water
Authors: Huda Al-Ghadeer; Mohammed Al Amry; Khalid A Aldihan; Omar S Alobaidan; Ghadah Mohammed S AlQahtani; Rajiv Khandekar Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2022-10-01