Javad Anjom-Shoae1,2, Ammar Hassanzadeh Keshteli3, Omid Sadeghi1,2, Hamed Pouraram2, Hamid Afshar4, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh5,6,7, Peyman Adibi8. 1. Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box 14155-6117, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 4. Psychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 5. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box 14155-6117, Tehran, Iran. a-esmaillzadeh@tums.ac.ir. 6. Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. a-esmaillzadeh@tums.ac.ir. 7. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. a-esmaillzadeh@tums.ac.ir. 8. Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Hyperinsulinemia is linked to the development of various chronic diseases, especially obesity given to the role of insulin responses in body fat accumulation; hence, the current study aimed to examine the association of insulinemic potential of the diet with general and abdominal obesity among a large population of Iranian adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out among 8691 adult participants aged 18-55 years. Dietary data were collected using a validated dish-based 106-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Dietary insulin index (DII) was computed through considering food insulin index values published earlier. Dietary insulin load (DIL) was also calculated using a standard formula. Assessment of anthropometric measures was conducted through a self-administered questionnaire. General obesity was defined as body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, and abdominal obesity as waist circumference ≥ 94 cm for men and ≥ 80 cm for women. RESULTS: Mean age of study participants was 36.8 ± 8.1 years; 60.3% were women. Compared with the lowest quintile, women in the highest quintile of DIL were less likely to be abdominally obese (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.92). Such significant association was not seen after controlling for potential confounders (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.44-1.67). Neither in crude nor in adjusted models, we observed a significant association between DIL and general obesity among men and women. In terms of dietary insulin index, men in the top quintile of DII were more likely to be generally overweight or obese compared with those in the bottom quintile (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.62). This association became non-significant after controlling for demographic characteristics (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.84-1.56). Furthermore, in thefully adjusted model, women in the top quintile of DII were more likely to have general obesity compared with those in the bottom quintile (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.07-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: We found that adherence to a diet with a high DII was associated with greater odds of general obesity among women, but not in men. Although such information might help to draw conclusions on the practical relevance of the shown findings, further studies, specifically of prospective design, are warranted.
PURPOSE:Hyperinsulinemia is linked to the development of various chronic diseases, especially obesity given to the role of insulin responses in body fat accumulation; hence, the current study aimed to examine the association of insulinemic potential of the diet with general and abdominal obesity among a large population of Iranian adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out among 8691 adult participants aged 18-55 years. Dietary data were collected using a validated dish-based 106-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Dietary insulin index (DII) was computed through considering food insulin index values published earlier. Dietary insulin load (DIL) was also calculated using a standard formula. Assessment of anthropometric measures was conducted through a self-administered questionnaire. General obesity was defined as body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, and abdominal obesity as waist circumference ≥ 94 cm for men and ≥ 80 cm for women. RESULTS: Mean age of study participants was 36.8 ± 8.1 years; 60.3% were women. Compared with the lowest quintile, women in the highest quintile of DIL were less likely to be abdominally obese (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.92). Such significant association was not seen after controlling for potential confounders (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.44-1.67). Neither in crude nor in adjusted models, we observed a significant association between DIL and general obesity among men and women. In terms of dietary insulin index, men in the top quintile of DII were more likely to be generally overweight or obese compared with those in the bottom quintile (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.62). This association became non-significant after controlling for demographic characteristics (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.84-1.56). Furthermore, in thefully adjusted model, women in the top quintile of DII were more likely to have general obesity compared with those in the bottom quintile (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.07-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: We found that adherence to a diet with a high DII was associated with greater odds of general obesity among women, but not in men. Although such information might help to draw conclusions on the practical relevance of the shown findings, further studies, specifically of prospective design, are warranted.