Literature DB >> 31147490

The Development of an International Oncofertility Competency Framework: A Model to Increase Oncofertility Implementation.

Antoinette Anazodo1,2,3, Paula Laws4, Shanna Logan3, Carla Saunders5, Jo Travaglia5, Brigitte Gerstl4,3, Natalie Bradford6, Richard Cohn4,3, Mary Birdsall7, Ronald Barr8, Nao Suzuki9, Seido Takae9, Ricardo Marinho10, Shuo Xiao11, Qiong-Hua Chen12, Nalini Mahajan13, Madhuri Patil14, Devika Gunasheela15, Kristen Smith16, Leonard Sender17, Cláudia Melo18, Teresa Almeida-Santos18, Mahmoud Salama19,16, Leslie Appiah20,21,22, Irene Su23, Sheila Lane24,25, Teresa K Woodruff16, Allan Pacey26, Richard A Anderson27, Francoise Shenfield28, Elizabeth Sullivan29, William Ledger3,30.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite international evidence about fertility preservation (FP), several barriers still prevent the implementation of equitable FP practice. Currently, oncofertility competencies do not exist. The aim of this study was to develop an oncofertility competency framework that defines the key components of oncofertility care, develops a model for prioritizing service development, and defines the roles that health care professionals (HCPs) play. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: A quantitative modified Delphi methodology was used to conduct two rounds of an electronic survey, querying and synthesizing opinions about statements regarding oncofertility care with HCPs and patient and family advocacy groups (PFAs) from 16 countries (12 high and 4 middle income). Statements included the roles of HCPs and priorities for service development care across ten domains (communication, oncofertility decision aids, age-appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, oncofertility training, reproductive survivorship care and fertility-related psychosocial support, supportive care, and ethical frameworks) that represent 33 different elements of care.
RESULTS: The first questionnaire was completed by 457 participants (332 HCPs and 125 PFAs). One hundred and thirty-eight participants completed the second questionnaire (122 HCPs and 16 PFAs). Consensus was agreed on 108 oncofertility competencies and the roles HCPs should play in oncofertility care. A three-tier service development model is proposed, with gradual implementation of different components of care. A total of 92.8% of the 108 agreed competencies also had agreement between high and middle income participants.
CONCLUSION: FP guidelines establish best practice but do not consider the skills and requirements to implement these guidelines. The competency framework gives HCPs and services a structure for the training of HCPs and implementation of care, as well as defining a model for prioritizing oncofertility service development. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite international evidence about fertility preservation (FP), several barriers still prevent the implementation of equitable FP practice. The competency framework gives 108 competencies that will allow health care professionals (HCPs) and services a structure for the development of oncofertility care, as well as define the role HCPs play to provide care and support. The framework also proposes a three-tier oncofertility service development model which prioritizes the development of components of oncofertility care into essential, enhanced, and expert services, giving clear recommendations for service development. The competency framework will enhance the implementation of FP guidelines, improving the equitable access to medical and psychological oncofertility care. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Competency; Fertility preservation; Models of care; Oncofertility; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31147490      PMCID: PMC6975957          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  29 in total

1.  Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  F A Peccatori; H A Azim; R Orecchia; H J Hoekstra; N Pavlidis; V Kesic; G Pentheroudakis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Female fertility in the cancer setting: availability and quality of online health information.

Authors:  Anne Marie de Man; Alexandra Rashedi; Willianne Nelen; Antoinette Anazodo; Alfred Rademaker; Saskia de Roo; Catharina Beerendonk; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.767

3.  Fertility Preservation in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Brittany E Harvey; Alison W Loren
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Fertility preservation for medical reasons in girls and women: British fertility society policy and practice guideline.

Authors:  Ephia Yasmin; Neerujah Balachandren; Melanie C Davies; Georgina L Jones; Sheila Lane; Raj Mathur; Lisa Webber; Richard A Anderson
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.767

5.  Using a patient-centered approach to develop a fertility preservation brochure for pediatric oncology patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Devin Murphy; Kelly K Sawczyn; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 1.814

6.  Oncology social workers' perceptions of barriers to discussing fertility preservation with cancer patients.

Authors:  Lindsey King; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Cheryl A Miree; Crystal Wilson; Heather Clayton; Brad Zebrack
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2008

7.  Pilot survey of oncologists regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation in female cancer patients.

Authors:  Eric J Forman; Carey K Anders; Millie A Behera
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Pediatric Oncology Providers' Attitudes and Practice Patterns Regarding Fertility Preservation in Adolescent Male Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amanda Fuchs; James A Kashanian; Marla L Clayman; Yasmin Gosiengfiao; Barbara Lockart; Teresa K Woodruff; Robert E Brannigan
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.289

9.  Clinician provision of oncofertility support in cancer patients of a reproductive age: A systematic review.

Authors:  S Logan; J Perz; J Ussher; M Peate; A Anazodo
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Building Oncofertility Core Competency in Developing Countries: Experience From Egypt, Tunisia, Brazil, Peru, and Panama.

Authors:  Mahmoud Salama; Lauren Ataman; Tamer Taha; Osama Azmy; Marouen Braham; Fatma Douik; Mohamed Khrouf; Jhenifer Kliemchen Rodrigues; Fernando M Reis; Flor Sánchez; Sergio Romero; Mario Vega; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-03-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Developing a web-based oncofertility tool for reproductive-age women with breast cancer based on social support framework.

Authors:  Sheng-Miauh Huang; Ling-Ming Tseng; Ming-Jeng Yang; Aria Chang; Pei-Ju Lien; Yvonne Hsiung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Insights of Oncofertility in Mexico and Latin America.

Authors:  Francisco Jiménez-Trejo; Cristian Arriaga-Canon; Luis A Herrera; Telma Lisboa-Nascimento; Daniel Diaz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Evidenced-based practice of decision-making process in oncofertility care among registered nurses: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ching-Ting Lien; Sheng-Miauh Huang; Yi Hua Chen; Wen-Ting Cheng
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-11-18

4.  Installing oncofertility programs for common cancers in optimum resource settings (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part II): a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Installing oncofertility programs for breast cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings: Empirical data from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II.

Authors:  Mahmoud Salama; M Lambertini; M S Christianson; Y Jayasinghe; A Anazodo; M De Vos; F Amant; C Stern; L Appiah; T L Woodard; R A Anderson; L M Westphal; R E Leach; K A Rodriguez-Wallberg; P Patrizio; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Does patient and public involvement influence the development of competency frameworks for the health professions? A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole Murray; Claire Palermo; Alan Batt; Kristie Bell
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Theory-Guided Development of Fertility Care Implementation Strategies for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Anna Dornisch; Emily H Yang; Jamie Gruspe; Erin R Roesch; Paula Aristizabal; Greg A Aarons; Teresa Helsten; Michelle B Takemoto; Sally A D Romero; Bonnie N Kaiser; Hui-Chun Irene Su
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.757

8.  Oncofertility as a Universal Right and a Global Oncology Priority.

Authors:  Maria T Bourlon; Antoinette Anazodo; Teresa K Woodruff; Eva Segelov
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.