Literature DB >> 31146808

3-Year Outcomes After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprostheses: The PARTNER 2 Registry.

John G Webb1, Dale J Murdoch2, Maria C Alu3, Anson Cheung2, Aaron Crowley4, Danny Dvir5, Howard C Herrmann6, Susheel K Kodali3, Jonathon Leipsic2, D Craig Miller7, Philippe Pibarot8, Rakesh M Suri9, David Wood2, Martin B Leon10, Michael J Mack11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for degenerated surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is associated with favorable early outcomes. However, little is known about the durability and longer-term outcomes associated with this therapy.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine late outcomes after valve-in-valve TAVR.
METHODS: Patients with symptomatic degeneration of surgical aortic bioprostheses at high risk (≥50% major morbidity or mortality) for reoperative surgery were prospectively enrolled in the multicenter PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2 valve-in-valve and continued access registries. Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was obtained.
RESULTS: Valve-in-valve procedures were performed in 365 patients. The mean age was 78.9 ± 10.2 years, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 9.1 ± 4.7%. At 3 years, the overall Kaplan-Meier estimate of all-cause mortality was 32.7%. Aortic valve re-replacement was required in 1.9%. Mean transaortic gradient was 35.0 mm Hg at baseline, decreasing to 17.8 mm Hg at 30-day follow-up and 16.6 mm Hg at 3-year follow-up. Baseline effective orifice area was 0.93 cm2, increasing to 1.13 and 1.15 cm2 at 30 days and 3 years, respectively. Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was reduced from 45.1% at pre-TAVR baseline to 2.5% at 3 years. Importantly, moderate or severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation also decreased (33.7% vs. 8.6% [p < 0.0001] and 29.7% vs. 18.8% [p = 0.002], respectively). Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 50.7%, increasing to 54.7% at 3 years (p < 0.0001), while left ventricular mass index was 136.4 g/m2, decreasing to 109.1 g/m2 at 3 years (p < 0.0001). New York Heart Association functional class improved, with 90.4% in class III or IV at baseline and 14.1% at 3 years (p < 0.0001), and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall score increased (43.1 to 73.1; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year follow-up, TAVR for bioprosthetic aortic valve failure was associated with favorable survival, sustained improved hemodynamic status, and excellent functional and quality-of-life outcomes. (The PARTNER II Trial: Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves II - PARTNER II - Nested Registry 3/Valve-in-Valve [PII NR3/ViV]; NCT03225001).
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  6-min walk distance; aortic stenosis; mortality; registry; regurgitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31146808     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.

Authors:  Sameer A Hirji; Edward D Percy; Cheryl K Zogg; Alexandra Malarczyk; Morgan T Harloff; Farhang Yazdchi; Tsuyoshi Kaneko
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated stentless aortic bioroots.

Authors:  Davut Cekmecelioglu; Ourania Preventza; Kathryn G Dougherty; Subhasis Chatterjee; Susan Y Green; Guilherme V Silva; Jose G Díez; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

3.  Outcomes after transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation using a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien valve in patients with degenerated Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Christof Burgdorf; Andrijana Vukadinovikj Momchilovska; Bjoern Andrew Remppis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

4.  Ascending Aorta Pseudoaneurysm as a Rare, Late Complication after Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Procedure.

Authors:  Veronika Vejtasova; Jiri Bonaventura; Robert Topalo; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantations Using Inverted J-Valve.

Authors:  Lulu Liu; Bowen Xiao; Binggang Wu; Yingqiang Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdallah El Sabbagh; Mohammed Al-Hijji; Mayra Guerrero
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 7.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Current Indications and Future Directions.

Authors:  Mirjam Gauri Winkel; Stefan Stortecky; Peter Wenaweser
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-12-18

8.  Current challenges in TAVI: neo-commissural alignment to mimic more physiologic valve implantation.

Authors:  Aditya Sengupta; Sophia L Alexis; Jason C Kovacic; Gilbert H L Tang
Journal:  Vessel Plus       Date:  2020-12-10

9.  A case report of open-aorta, direct transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation: an innovative approach to manage the hazard of coronary flow compromise in transcatheter aortic valve re-interventions.

Authors:  Domenico Calcaterra; Navneet Kaur; Gopika Dasari; George Daniel
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-17

10.  Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands.

Authors:  G J van Steenbergen; B van Straten; K Y Lam; D van Veghel; L Dekker; P A Tonino
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.