| Literature DB >> 31146436 |
Seojin Jung1, Jaejin An2, Hyungjin Na3, Jooyoun Kim4,5.
Abstract
Particulate airborne pollutants are a big concern to public health, and it brings growing attention about effective filtration devices. Especially, particulate matters smaller than 2.5 µm can reach the thoracic region and the blood stream, and the associated health risk can be exacerbated when pathogenic microbials are present in the air. This study aims at understanding the surface characteristics of nonwoven media that influence filtration performance against solid particles (sodium chloride, NaCl), oily aerosol (dioctyl phthalate, DOP), and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteria. Nonwoven media of polystyrene (PS) fibers were fabricated by electrospinning and its pristine surface energy (38.5 mN/m) was modified to decrease (12.3 mN/m) by the plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) of octafluorocyclobutane (C4F8) or to increase (68.5 mN/m) by the oxygen (O2) plasma treatment. For NaCl particles and S. aureus aerosol, PS electrospun web showed higher quality factor than polypropylene (PP) meltblown electret that is readily available for commercial products. The O2 plasma treatment of PS media significantly deteriorated the filtration efficiency, presumably due to the quick dissipation of static charges by the O2 plasma treatment. The C4F8 treated, fluorinated PS media resisted quick wetting of DOP, and its filtration efficiency for DOP and S. aureus remained similar while its efficiency for NaCl decreased. The findings of this study will impact on determining relevant surface treatments for effective particulate filtration. As this study examined the instantaneous performance within 1-2 min of particulate exposure, and the further study with the extended exposure is suggested.Entities:
Keywords: aerosol; bacteria; electret; electrospun web; filtration; particle; surface energy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31146436 PMCID: PMC6631268 DOI: 10.3390/polym11060935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic overview of study.
Figure 2Illustration of bacterial filtration test.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of different webs. (a) polypropylene (PP) spunbound (SB); (b) PP meltblown (MB); (c) polystyrene (PS) electrospun web (ES); (d) PS(F) ES; (e) PS(O) ES (O2 plasma-treated web).
X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) atomic concentration (%) of surfaces.
| Surface | C (%) | O (%) | F (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PP | 100 | - | - |
| PS | 100 | - | - |
| PS(F) | 71 | - | 29 |
| PS(O) | 85 | 15 | - |
Note: The XPS analysis was conducted on the film surfaces that were treated or untreated. The fibrous surface was not measurable by XPS due to the presence of protruding fine fibers.
Characteristics of webs.
| Web | Basis Weight (g/m2) | Thickness (mm) | Fiber Diameter (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PP SB | 23 (± 1) | 0.23 (± 0.04) | 23.0 (± 1.5) |
| PP MB | 30 (± 2) | 0.32 (± 0.07) | 4.1 (± 1.5) |
| PS ES | 14 (± 1) | 0.13 (± 0.03) | 2.2 (± 1.1) |
| PS(F) ES | 13 (± 3) | 0.13 (± 0.02) | 2.5 (± 1.3) |
| PS(O) ES | 10 (± 1) | 0.10 (± 0.03) | 3.1 (± 1.5) |
Surface energy of different surfaces.
| Sample | Contact Angle (°) | Surface Energy (mN/m) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WA | DM | γ | γd | γp | |
| PP | 105 | 63 | 26.9 | 26.7 | 0.16 |
| PS | 110 | 45 | 38.5 | 38.0 | 0.46 |
| PS(F) | 120 | 91 | 12.3 | 12.2 | 0.07 |
| PS(O) | 21 | 55 | 68.5 | 25.6 | 42.9 |
Note: γ, total surface energy; γ and γ, dispersive and polar components of surface energy, respectively. For WA, the dispersive and polar components of 21.8 mN/m and 51.0 mN/m, respectively, were used [54]. For DM, the dispersive and polar components of 50.4 mN/m and 0.4 mN/m, respectively, were used [54].
Surface wettability of different webs.
| Measure | PP SB | PP MB | PS ES | PS(F) ES | PS(O) ES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WA CA | 154° (± 2.7) | 154° (± 1.8) | 157° (± 1.5) | 159° (± 4.0) | 0° |
| WA ShA | 34° (± 1.7) | 14° (± 1.1) | 41° (± 0.5) | 11° (± 2.0) | NA |
| DOP CA | 0° | 0° | 0° | 151° (± 2.5) | 0° |
| PEP CA | 121° (± 1.2) | 144° (± 2.8) | 145° (± 1.8) | 153° (± 2.5) | 0° |
Note: WA, water; CA, contact angle; ShA, shedding angle; PEP, peptone water.
Figure 4Pressure drop (a) and pore size distribution (b) of nonwoven media.
Figure 5Filtration performance for NaCl and DOP. (a) % Penetration of NaCl; (b) % Penetration of DOP; (c) Quality factor for NaCl; (d) Quality factor for DOP. Note: PP SB is two layers of PP SB.
Figure 6S. aureus bacteria filtration. (a) % Penetration; (b) Quality factor. Note: PP SB is two layers of PP SB.