| Literature DB >> 31146410 |
Zhixiong Chen1, Cong Ye2, Jinsha Yuan3, Dongsheng Han4.
Abstract
Wireless and power line communications (PLC) are important components of distribution network communication, and have a broad application prospect in the fields of intelligent power consumption and home Internet of Things (IoT). This study mainly analyzes the performance of a dual-hop wireless/power line hybrid fading system employing an amplify-and-forward (AF) relay in terms of outage probability and average bit error rate (BER). The Nakagami-m distribution captures the wireless channel fading; whereas the PLC channel gain is characterized by the Log-normal (LogN) distribution. Moreover, the Bernoulli-Gaussian noise model is used on the noise attached to the PLC channel. Owing to the similarity between LogN and Gamma distributions, the key parameters of probability density function (PDF) with approximate distribution are determined by using moment generating function (MGF) equations, joint optimization of s vectors, and approximation of LogN variable sum. The MGF of the harmonic mean of the dual Gamma distribution variables is derived to evaluate the system performance suitable for any fading parameter m value. Finally, Monte Carlo simulation is used to verify the versatility and accuracy of the proposed method, and the influence of the hybrid fading channel and multidimensional impulse noise parameters on system performance is analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: Internet of Things (IoT); harmonic mean; hybrid fading; moment generating function (MGF); mutual approximation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31146410 PMCID: PMC6603784 DOI: 10.3390/s19112460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1System model for a dual-hop wireless/power line hybrid communication system with amplify-and-forward (AF) relay.
Figure 2Probability density function (PDF) comparison of with the Log-normal (LogN) and approximated Gamma distributions.
Figure 3PDF comparison of with the Gamma and approximated LogN distributions.
Optimal solution for different power line fading parameters σD.
|
|
|
|
|
| Objective Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3.2051 | 23.6809 | 4.2187 | 0.1997 | 2.0254 |
| 2.5 | 2.8908 | 24.6753 | 3.4932 | 0.2339 | 1.0062 |
| 2.8 | 2.8617 | 22.8037 | 3.1355 | 0.2561 | 0.6931 |
| 3 | 3.0924 | 17.5526 | 2.8639 | 0.2776 | 0.6951 |
| 3.3 | 3.2179 | 15.1707 | 2.5934 | 0.3015 | 0.7413 |
Optimal solution for different wireless line fading parameters mR.
| mR | s1 | s2 |
|
| Objective Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3.7589 | 14.7629 | −0.0852 | 0.4554 | 0.8255 |
| 2.5 | 4.1872 | 21.2461 | −0.0472 | 0.4197 | 0.6104 |
| 2.9 | 2.4379 | 15.7817 | −0.0416 | 0.4005 | 0.5272 |
| 3.2 | 2.3628 | 20.4712 | −0.0340 | 0.3854 | 0.5281 |
| 3.5 | 2.9697 | 20.3867 | −0.0178 | 0.3700 | 0.7707 |
Figure 4Comparison of PDF for instantaneous SNR with the LogN and approximated Gamma distributions using the best s value optimization method.
Figure 5Comparison of PDF for instantaneous SNR with the Gamma and approximated LogN distributions using the best s value optimization method.
Figure 6Comparison of analytical and simulated results of the system bit error rate (BER) and the per hop average SNR.
Figure 7Comparison of analytical and simulated outage probabilities for various values of Rth thresholds.
Figure 8Influence of the selection of the s value in the two approximation algorithms on the system BER.
Figure 9Comparison of the system analytical BER and the fading parameters and under various modulation schemes.