Literature DB >> 31146290

Comparing Outcomes for Fasciocutaneous versus Muscle Flaps in Foot and Ankle Free Flap Reconstruction.

Z-Hye Lee1, Salma A Abdou1, David A Daar1, Lavinia Anzai1, John T Stranix2, Vishal Thanik1, Jamie P Levine1, Pierre B Saadeh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The distal lower extremity poses unique reconstructive challenges due to its requirements for durability of the load-bearing plantar surface and for thin, pliable contour in the dorsal foot and ankle region. This study compares outcomes between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps in patients with foot and ankle defects.
METHODS: A retrospective review of soft tissue free flaps used for traumatic foot and ankle defects was performed. Outcomes included takebacks, partial flap failure, total flap failure, and wound complications.
RESULTS: A total of 165 cases met inclusion criteria, with muscle flaps (n = 110) comprising the majority. Defects involving the non-weight-bearing surface were more common (n = 86) than those of the weight-bearing surface (n = 79). Complications occurred in 56 flaps (33.9%), including 11 partial losses (6.7%) and 6 complete losses (3.6%). There were no differences in take backs, partial flap failure, or total flap failure between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps; however, fasciocutaneous flaps had significantly fewer wound complications compared with muscle flaps (7.3% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.046). On multivariable regression analysis, defects of the weight-bearing surface had significantly increased risk of wound breakdown compared with those in the non-weight-bearing surface (odds ratio: 5.05, p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Compared with fasciocutaneous flaps, muscle flaps demonstrated higher rates of wound complications. While the flap selection in foot and ankle reconstruction depends on the nature of the defect, our findings support the use of fasciocutaneous over muscle flaps in this region. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31146290     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  4 in total

1.  Three-stage limb salvage in tibial fracture related infection with composite bone and soft-tissue defect.

Authors:  Pablo S Corona; Carla Carbonell-Rosell; Matías Vicente; Jordi Serracanta; Kevin Tetsworth; Vaida Glatt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Comparison of distally based sural artery and supramalleolar flap for coverage of dorsum of foot and ankle defects; a cross-sectional study of 53 patients.

Authors:  Pervaiz Mehmood Hashmi; Abeer Musaddiq; Alizah Hashmi; Marij Zahid
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-12-04

3.  Foot and ankle reconstruction using the lateral supramalleolar flap versus the anterolateral thigh flap in the elderly: A comparative study.

Authors:  Peifeng Li; Huaibao Zhang; Junyi Zhu; Haisheng Qiu; Xiao Ni; Fangzheng Yu; Jian Xiao; Jian Wang; Shenghu Du
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.099

4.  Muscle vs. Fasciocutaneous Microvascular Free Flaps for Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Vladimir Mégevand; Domizio Suva; Morad Mohamad; Didier Hannouche; Daniel F Kalbermatten; Carlo M Oranges
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.