Literature DB >> 31146265

Range verification of radioactive ion beams of 11C and 15O using in-beam PET imaging.

Akram Mohammadi1, Hideaki Tashima, Yuma Iwao, Sodai Takyu, Go Akamatsu, Fumihiko Nishikido, Eiji Yoshida, Atsushi Kitagawa, Katia Parodi, Taiga Yamaya.   

Abstract

In advanced ion therapy, the visualization of the range of incident ions in a patient's body is important for exploiting the advantages of this type of therapy. It is ideal to use radioactive ion beams for in-beam positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in particle therapy due to the high quality of PET images caused by the high signal-to-noise ratio. We have shown the feasibility of this idea through an in-beam PET study for 11C and 15O ion beams using the dedicated OpenPET system. In this work, we investigate the potential difference between the Bragg peak position and the position of the maximum detected positron-emitting fragments by a PET system for the radioactive beams of 11C and 15O. For this purpose, we measured the depth dose in a water phantom and performed PET scans of an irradiated PMMA phantom for the available beams of 11C and 15O at the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC). Then, we simulated the depth dose profiles in the water phantom and the yield of the positron-emitting fragments in a PMMA phantom for both available beams using the Monte Carlo code PHITS. The positions of the Bragg peak and maximum positron-emitting fragments from the measurements were well reproduced by simulation. The effect of beam energy broadening on the positional differences between two peaks was studied by simulating an irradiated PMMA phantom. The differences in position between the Bragg peak and the maximum positron-emitting fragments increased when the beam energy spread was broadened, although the differences were zero for the ideal mono-energetic beams. Greater differences were observed for 11C ion beams compared to 15O ion beams, although both beams had the same range in water, and the higher energy corresponded to a larger difference. For the known energy spread of the beams, the predicted differences between two peaks from the simulation were consistent with the measured data within submillimetre agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31146265     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab25ce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

Review 1.  Medical application of particle and heavy ion transport code system PHITS.

Authors:  Takuya Furuta; Tatsuhiko Sato
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-06-30

2.  Roadmap toward the 10 ps time-of-flight PET challenge.

Authors:  Paul Lecoq; Christian Morel; John O Prior; Dimitris Visvikis; Stefan Gundacker; Etiennette Auffray; Peter Križan; Rosana Martinez Turtos; Dominique Thers; Edoardo Charbon; Joao Varela; Christophe de La Taille; Angelo Rivetti; Dominique Breton; Jean-François Pratte; Johan Nuyts; Suleman Surti; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Paul Marsden; Katia Parodi; Jose Maria Benlloch; Mathieu Benoit
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Radioactive Beams for Image-Guided Particle Therapy: The BARB Experiment at GSI.

Authors:  Daria Boscolo; Daria Kostyleva; Mohammad Javad Safari; Vasiliki Anagnostatou; Juha Äystö; Soumya Bagchi; Tim Binder; Georgios Dedes; Peter Dendooven; Timo Dickel; Vasyl Drozd; Bernhard Franczack; Hans Geissel; Chiara Gianoli; Christian Graeff; Tuomas Grahn; Florian Greiner; Emma Haettner; Roghieh Haghani; Muhsin N Harakeh; Felix Horst; Christine Hornung; Jan-Paul Hucka; Nasser Kalantar-Nayestanaki; Erika Kazantseva; Birgit Kindler; Ronja Knöbel; Natalia Kuzminchuk-Feuerstein; Bettina Lommel; Ivan Mukha; Chiara Nociforo; Shunki Ishikawa; Giulio Lovatti; Munetaka Nitta; Ikechi Ozoemelam; Stephane Pietri; Wolfgang R Plaß; Andrej Prochazka; Sivaji Purushothaman; Claire-Anne Reidel; Heidi Roesch; Fabio Schirru; Christoph Schuy; Olga Sokol; Timo Steinsberger; Yoshiki K Tanaka; Isao Tanihata; Peter Thirolf; Walter Tinganelli; Bernd Voss; Uli Weber; Helmut Weick; John S Winfield; Martin Winkler; Jianwei Zhao; Christoph Scheidenberger; Katia Parodi; Marco Durante
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Carbon-11 and Carbon-12 beam range verifications through prompt gamma and annihilation gamma measurements: Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Ananta Raj Chalise; Yujie Chi; Youfang Lai; Yiping Shao; Mingwu Jin
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-09-29

5.  Radioactive Beams in Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-08-28

6.  Immuno-OpenPET: a novel approach for early diagnosis and image-guided surgery for small resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yukie Yoshii; Hideaki Tashima; Yuma Iwao; Eiji Yoshida; Hidekatsu Wakizaka; Go Akamatsu; Taiga Yamaya; Hiroki Matsumoto; Mitsuyoshi Yoshimoto; Chika Igarashi; Fukiko Hihara; Tomoko Tachibana; Ming-Rong Zhang; Kotaro Nagatsu; Aya Sugyo; Atsushi B Tsuji; Tatsuya Higashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.