Literature DB >> 31146071

Inclusion of heart substructures in the optimization process of volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques may reduce the risk of heart disease in Hodgkin's lymphoma patients.

Mario Levis1, Andrea Riccardo Filippi2, Christian Fiandra3, Viola De Luca3, Sara Bartoncini3, Dwayne Vella4, Riccardo Ragona3, Umberto Ricardi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), but increases the risk of long term complications as cardiac events and second cancers. This study aimed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events through an optimization of the dose distribution on heart substructures in mediastinal HL patients with the adoption of different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques, while maintaining the same risk of second cancer induction on lungs and breasts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (15 males and 15 females, 15 bulky lesions) treated between 2012 and 2017 at our institution were selected. Disease extent was mediastinum plus neck (n = 10), mediastinum plus unilateral axilla (n = 10) and mediastinum alone (n = 10). Lungs, breasts, whole heart and sub-structures (coronary arteries, valves and chambers) were contoured as organs at risk and included in the optimization process. A "first-generation" multi-arc butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT) planning solution was compared to a full-arc butterfly VMAT (FaB-VMAT) approach, consisting of a full arc plus a non-coplanar arc. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of second breast and lung cancer and relative risk (RR) of coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) were estimated.
RESULTS: FaB-VMAT resulted in lower mean dose to whole heart (7.6 vs 6.9 Gy, p = 0.003), all coronary arteries (16.1 vs 13.5 Gy, p < 0.001), left ventricle (4.2 vs 3.4 Gy, p = 0.007) and in lower V20Gy to the lungs (15% vs 14%, p = 0.008). A significant lower RR for CAD and CHF was observed for FaB-VMAT. The risk of second breast and lung cancer was comparable between the two solutions, with the exception of female patients with mediastinal bulky involvement, where B-VMAT resulted in lower mean dose (2.8 vs 3.5 Gy, p = 0.03) and V4Gy (22% vs 16%, 0.04) to breasts, with a significant reduction in LAR (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: FaB-VMAT significantly decreased the RR for CAD and CHF compared to B-VMAT, with almost the same overall risk of lung and breast cancer induction. These results are influenced by the different anatomical presentations, supporting the need for an individualized approach.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac risk; Heart toxicity; Hodgkin lymphoma; IMRT/VMAT; Radiotherapy; Second cancers

Year:  2019        PMID: 31146071     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  8 in total

1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Eren Celik; Wolfgang Baus; Christian Baues; Wolfgang Schröder; Alessandro Clivio; Antonella Fogliata; Marta Scorsetti; Simone Marnitz; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Proton Therapy For Lymphomas: Current State Of The Art.

Authors:  Umberto Ricardi; Maja V Maraldo; Mario Levis; Rahul R Parikh
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) expert consensus on the use of intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma involving the mediastinum.

Authors:  Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Sofia Meregalli; Anna DI Russo; Mario Levis; Patrizia Ciammella; Michela Buglione; Andrea Emanuele Guerini; Giuseppina De Marco; Vitaliana De Sanctis; Stefano Vagge; Umberto Ricardi; Gabriele Simontacchi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  On the Importance of Individualized, Non-Coplanar Beam Configurations in Mediastinal Lymphoma Radiotherapy, Optimized With Automated Planning.

Authors:  Linda Rossi; Patricia Cambraia Lopes; Joana Marques Leitão; Cecile Janus; Marjan van de Pol; Sebastiaan Breedveld; Joan Penninkhof; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Late Cardiological Sequelae and Long-Term Monitoring in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Survivors: A Systematic Review by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.

Authors:  Stefano Oliva; Agata Puzzovivo; Chiara Gerardi; Eleonora Allocati; Vitaliana De Sanctis; Carla Minoia; Tetiana Skrypets; Attilio Guarini; Guido Gini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Proton Therapy in Supradiaphragmatic Lymphoma: Predicting Treatment-Related Mortality to Help Optimize Patient Selection.

Authors:  Georgios Ntentas; Katerina Dedeckova; Michal Andrlik; Marianne C Aznar; Rebecca Shakir; Johanna Ramroth; Rubina Begum; Jiří Kubeš; Sarah C Darby; N George Mikhaeel; David J Cutter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  [Radiotherapy in early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (GHSG HD17) : A multicentre phase III trial].

Authors:  Christoph Süß; Oliver Kölbl
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Validation of an established deep learning auto-segmentation tool for cardiac substructures in 4D radiotherapy planning scans.

Authors:  Gerard M Walls; Valentina Giacometti; Aditya Apte; Maria Thor; Conor McCann; Gerard G Hanna; John O'Connor; Joseph O Deasy; Alan R Hounsell; Karl T Butterworth; Aidan J Cole; Suneil Jain; Conor K McGarry
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.