T Pascart1, L Norberciak2, J Legrand3, F Becce4, J-F Budzik5. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, University of Lille, F-59160 Lomme, France; EA 4490, PMOI, Physiopathologie des Maladies Osseuses Inflammatoires, University of Lille, Lille, France. Electronic address: pascart.tristan@ghicl.net. 2. Department of Medical Research, Biostatistics, Lille Catholic Hospitals, University of Lille, Lomme, France. Electronic address: norberciak.laurene@ghicl.net. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, University of Lille, Lomme, France. Electronic address: legrand.julie@ghicl.net. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: fabio.becce@chuv.ch. 5. EA 4490, PMOI, Physiopathologie des Maladies Osseuses Inflammatoires, University of Lille, Lille, France; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, University of Lille, Lomme, France. Electronic address: budzik.jean-francois@ghicl.net.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) attenuation properties of meniscal calcifications in calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) in vivo, and assess whether DECT was able to discriminate meniscal CPP deposits from calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) in subchondral and trabecular bone. METHOD: Patients with clinical suspicion of crystal-related arthropathy (gout and/or CPPD) and knee DECT scans were retrospectively assigned to CPPD (n = 19) or control (n = 21) groups depending on the presence/absence of chondrocalcinosis on DECT. Two observers drew standardized regions of interest (ROI) in meniscal calcifications, non-calcified menisci, as well as subchondral and trabecular bone. Five DECT parameters were obtained: CT numbers (HU) at 80 and 140 kV, dual-energy index (DEI), electron density (ρe), and effective atomic number (Zeff). The four different knee structures were compared within/between patients and controls using linear mixed models, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Meniscal calcifications (n = 89) in CPPD patients had mean ± SD CT numbers at 80 and 140 kV of 257 ± 64 and 201 ± 48 HU, respectively; with a DEI of 0.023 ± 0.007, and ρe and Zeff of 140 ± 35 and 8.8 ± 0.3, respectively. Meniscal CPP deposits were readily distinguished from calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone (p ≤ 0.001), except at 80 kV separately (p = 0.74). Zeff and ρe both significantly differed between CPP deposits and calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study shows that DECT has the potential to discriminate meniscal CPP deposits from calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone in vivo, paving the way for the non-invasive biochemical signature assessment of intra- and juxta-articular calcium crystal deposits.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) attenuation properties of meniscal calcifications in calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) in vivo, and assess whether DECT was able to discriminate meniscal CPP deposits from calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) in subchondral and trabecular bone. METHOD:Patients with clinical suspicion of crystal-related arthropathy (gout and/or CPPD) and knee DECT scans were retrospectively assigned to CPPD (n = 19) or control (n = 21) groups depending on the presence/absence of chondrocalcinosis on DECT. Two observers drew standardized regions of interest (ROI) in meniscal calcifications, non-calcified menisci, as well as subchondral and trabecular bone. Five DECT parameters were obtained: CT numbers (HU) at 80 and 140 kV, dual-energy index (DEI), electron density (ρe), and effective atomic number (Zeff). The four different knee structures were compared within/between patients and controls using linear mixed models, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Meniscal calcifications (n = 89) in CPPD patients had mean ± SD CT numbers at 80 and 140 kV of 257 ± 64 and 201 ± 48 HU, respectively; with a DEI of 0.023 ± 0.007, and ρe and Zeff of 140 ± 35 and 8.8 ± 0.3, respectively. Meniscal CPP deposits were readily distinguished from calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone (p ≤ 0.001), except at 80 kV separately (p = 0.74). Zeff and ρe both significantly differed between CPP deposits and calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study shows that DECT has the potential to discriminate meniscal CPP deposits from calcium HA in subchondral and trabecular bone in vivo, paving the way for the non-invasive biochemical signature assessment of intra- and juxta-articular calciumcrystal deposits.
Authors: Sara K Tedeschi; Daniel H Solomon; Kazuki Yoshida; Kathleen Vanni; Dong Hyun Suh; Stacy E Smith Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Sara K Tedeschi; Fabio Becce; Tristan Pascart; Ali Guermazi; Jean-François Budzik; Nicola Dalbeth; Georgios Filippou; Annamaria Iagnocco; Minna J Kohler; Jean-Denis Laredo; Stacy E Smith; F Joseph Simeone; Janeth Yinh; Hyon Choi; Abhishek Abhishek Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: Anna L Falkowski; Jon A Jacobson; Vivek Kalia; Nathaniel B Meyer; Girish Gandikota; Matheos Yosef; Ralf G Thiele Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240