Literature DB >> 31145947

Overuse of Cystoscopic Surveillance Among Patients With Low-risk Non-Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer - A National Study of Patient, Provider, and Facility Factors.

David S Han1, Kristine E Lynch2, Ji Won Chang2, Brenda Sirovich3, Douglas J Robertson3, Amanda R Swanton4, John D Seigne5, Philip P Goodney3, Florian R Schroeck6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand cystoscopic surveillance practices among patients with low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
METHODS: Using a validated natural language processing algorithm, we included patients newly diagnosed with low-risk (ie low-grade Ta) NMIBC from 2005 to 2011 in the VA. Patients were followed until cancer recurrence, death, last contact, or 2 years after diagnosis. Based on guidelines, surveillance overuse was defined as >1 cystoscopy if followed <1 year, >2 cystoscopies if followed 1 to <2 years, or >3 cystoscopies if followed for 2 years. We identified patient, provider, and facility factors associated with overuse using multilevel logistic regression.
RESULTS: Overuse occurred in 75% of patients (852/1135) - with an excess of 1846 more cystoscopies performed than recommended. Adjusting for 14 factors, overuse was associated with patient race (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.85 unlisted race vs White), having 2 comorbidities (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.55 vs no comorbidities), and earlier year of diagnosis (OR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.29, 4.83 for 2005 vs 2011, and OR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.69 for 2006 vs 2011). On sensitivity analyses assuming all patients were diagnosed with multifocal or large low-grade tumors (ie, intermediate-risk), overuse would have still occurred in 45% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Overuse of cystoscopy among patients with low-risk NMIBC was common, raising concerns about bladder cancer surveillance cost and quality. However, few factors were associated with overuse. Further qualitative research is needed to identify other determinants of overuse not readily captured in administrative data. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31145947      PMCID: PMC6711796          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Management, Surveillance Patterns, and Costs Associated With Low-Grade Papillary Stage Ta Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Among Older Adults, 2004-2013.

Authors:  Kelly K Bree; Yong Shan; Patrick J Hensley; Niyati Lobo; Chengrui Hu; Douglas S Tyler; Karim Chamie; Ashish M Kamat; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 2.  The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?

Authors:  Rafaela Malinaric; Guglielmo Mantica; Lorenzo Lo Monaco; Federico Mariano; Rosario Leonardi; Alchiede Simonato; André Van der Merwe; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Madhusudan Koya; Sue Osborne; Christophe Chemaslé; Sima Porten; Anne Schuckman; Andrew Kennedy-Smith
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Endoscopic surveillance for bladder cancer: a systematic review of contemporary worldwide practices.

Authors:  Beth Russell; Pinky Kotecha; Ramesh Thurairaja; Rajesh Nair; Sachin Malde; Pardeep Kumar; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

Review 5.  Follow-up in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: facts and future.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.