| Literature DB >> 31145797 |
Qiangqiang Zhang1, Shaobing Peng1, Yong Li.
Abstract
The rapid response of stomatal conductance (gs) to fluctuating irradiance is of great importance to maximize carbon assimilation while minimizing water loss. Smaller stomata have been proven to have a faster response rate than larger ones, but most of these studies have been conducted with forest trees. In the present study, the effects of stomatal anatomy on the kinetics of gs and photosynthesis were investigated in 16 Oryza genotypes. Light-induced stomatal opening includes an initial time lag (λ) followed by an exponential increase. Smaller stomata had a larger maximum stomatal conductance increase rate (Slmax) during the exponential increase phase, but showed a longer time lag and a lower initial stomatal conductance (gs,initial) at low light. Stomatal size was, surprisingly, negatively correlated with the time required to reach 50% of maximum gs and photosynthesis (T50%gs and T50%A), which was shown to be positively correlated with λ and negatively correlated with gs,initial. With a lower gs,initial and a larger λ, small stomata showed a faster decrease of intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) during the induction process, which may have led to a slower apparent Rubisco activation rate. Therefore, smaller stomata do not always benefit photosynthesis as reported before; the influence of stomatal size on dynamic photosynthesis is also correlated with λ and gs,initial.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Oryza genus; Apparent Rubisco activation rate; flecked irradiance; photosynthesis; stomatal response rate; stomatal size
Year: 2019 PMID: 31145797 PMCID: PMC6793446 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
List of symbols including units and values
| Variable | Symbol | Unit | Value (25 °C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steady-state photosynthetic rate |
| µmol m−2 s−1 | |
| Steady-state stomatal conductance |
| mol m−2 s−1 | |
| Steady-state intercellular CO2 concentration |
| µmol−1 mol | |
| Initial stomatal conductance |
| mol m−2 s−1 | |
| Initial photosynthetic rate |
| µmol m−2 s−1 | |
| Initial intercellular CO2 concentration |
| µmol−1 mol | |
| Cuticular conductance |
| mol m−2 s−1 | |
| Guard cell length |
| µm | |
| Guard cell width |
| µm | |
| Stomatal density at abaxial leaf surface |
| mm−2 | |
| Stomatal density at adaxial leaf surface |
| mm−2 | |
| Stomatal size at abaxial leaf surface |
| µm2 | |
| Stomatal size at adaxial leaf surface |
| µm2 | |
| Maximum theoretical stomatal conductance |
| mol m−2 s−1 | |
| Diffusivity of water vapor in air |
| m−2 s−1 | 24.9 ×10–6 m−2 s−1 |
| Molar volume of air |
| m3 mol−1 | 22.4×10–3 m3 mol−1 |
| Maximum area of the open stomatal pore |
| µm2 | π( |
| Stomatal pore length |
| µm |
|
| Stomatal pore depth |
| µm |
|
| Rate of the Rubisco activation | 1/τ | s−1 | |
| Initial time lag for stomatal response | λ | s | |
| Time constant for stomatal response |
| s | |
| Maximum stomatal conductance increase rate | Slmax | mmol m−2 s−2 | |
| Time to 50% of the steady-state photosynthetic rate after shifting to high light |
| s | |
| Time to 50% of the steady-state stomatal conductance after shifting to high light |
| s | |
| Vapor pressure deficit | VPD | kPa | |
| Air relative humidity | RH | % | |
| Photosynthetic photon flux density | PPFD | µmol m−2 s−1 |
Intraspecific variations in stomatal size and density in rice plants
| Species | Genotype | Stomatal size (μm2) | Stomatal density (mm−2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Yangliangyou 6 | 142±23 | 127±17 | 811±101 | 684±49 |
|
| Liangyoupei 9 | 96±15 | 98±17 | 912±64 | 848±35 |
|
| Yongyou 12 | 142±21 | 147±15 | 610±84 | 500±157 |
|
| Ase bolong ka | 101±11 | 135±13 | 896±24 | 617±27 |
|
| Huanghuazhan | 127±24 | 130±15 | 915±100 | 686±128 |
|
| Trembese | 146±14 | 134±25 | 444±42 | 433±60 |
|
| Yangdao 6 | 143±18 | 135±15 | 690±60 | 767±57 |
|
| Buluh bawu | 126±12 | 150±14 | 864±17 | 538±39 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| S7705 | 152±11 | 159±22 | 350±58 | 514±51 |
|
| E9-23 | 150±37 | 194±36 | 381±80 | 246±32 |
|
| E1-6 | 188±33 | 205±20 | 174±36 | 208±49 |
|
| Aus | 210±23 | 230±26 | 358±34 | 312±39 |
|
| E16-21 | 145±20 | 159±27 | 454±32 | 368±42 |
|
| E13-10 | 185±12 | 191±20 | 533±34 | 296±41 |
|
| 2203 | 176±23 | 194±29 | 539±19 | 438±56 |
|
| ABC | 181±22 | 185±36 | 522±38 | 549±73 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ANOVA | |||||
| Species | *** | *** | *** | ** |
Data are shown as means ±SD of 5–10 replicates. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. The data with different uppercase letters in each column were significant at P<0.05 level.
Intraspecific variations in steady-state photosynthesis, CO2 diffusion conductance and dynamic photosynthetic parameters in rice plants
| Species | Genotype |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| λ | Slmax | 1/τ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (μmol m−2 s−1) | (mol m−2 s−1) | (mol m−2 s−1) | (mol m−2 s−1) | (mol m−2 s−1) | (s) | (s) | (s) | (mmol m−2 s−2) | ×10–5 (s−1) | ||
|
| Yangliangyou 6 | 20.6±1.6 | 5.7±0.2 | 0.43±0.04 | 0.026±0.004 | 0.009±0.001 | 639±133 | 749±142 | 487±113 | 0.96±0.01 | 238±197 |
|
| Liangyoupei 9 | 19.1±1.3 | 5.9±0.2 | 0.43±0.08 | 0.026±0.008 | 0.007±0.001 | 615±29 | 718±46 | 402±109 | 0.76±0.25 | 325±80 |
|
| Yongyou 12 | 22.3±1.2 | 5.8±0.3 | 0.58±0.06 | 0.028±0.001 | 0.010±0.001 | 610±68 | 700±128 | 449±90 | 1.05±0.08 | 243±118 |
|
| Ase bolong ka | 22.8±1.8 | 5.0±0.1 | 0.58±0.17 | 0.028±0.007 | 0.009±0.001 | 460±68 | 560±61 | 337±31 | 1.46±0.42 | 547±221 |
|
| Huanghuazhan | 19.3±1.9 | 5.8±0.2 | 0.39±0.07 | 0.030±0.003 | 0.012±0.001 | 580±73 | 568±54 | 428±50 | 1.90±0.57 | 61±31 |
|
| Trembese | 17.0±1.3 | 3.5±0.1 | 0.40±0.06 | 0.033±0.011 | 0.013±0.001 | 559±108 | 651±154 | 350±92 | 1.31±0.58 | 174±111 |
|
| Yangdao 6 | 17.7±1.4 | 5.5±0.5 | 0.38±0.07 | 0.034±0.005 | 0.014±0.001 | 447±112 | 495±135 | 225±51 | 0.61±0.33 | 757±530 |
|
| Buluh bawu | 25.7±0.9 | 5.0±0.2 | 0.57±0.07 | 0.034±0.011 | 0.011±0.001 | 476±73 | 556±60 | 368±56 | 1.52±0.21 | 422±219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| S7705 | 15.5±2.6 | 3.6±0.1 | 0.33±0.03 | 0.042±0.016 | 0.024±0.001 | 431±36 | 431±38 | 232±43 | 1.08±0.33 | 473±133 |
|
| E9-23 | 13.9±1.5 | 3.2±0.1 | 0.31±0.04 | 0.050±0.009 | 0.011±0.001 | 196±76 | 383±16 | 42±30 | 0.45±0.23 | 1259±241 |
|
| E1-6 | 16.9±1.5 | 1.9±0.0 | 0.51±0.03 | 0.072±0.015 | 0.022±0.001 | 215±62 | 353±94 | 67±31 | 0.83±0.19 | 2023±746 |
|
| Aus | 15.5±2.5 | 3.4±0.2 | 0.26±0.06 | 0.089±0.018 | 0.026±0.005 | 137±12 | 124±13 | 23±24 | 0.30±0.04 | 972±196 |
|
| E16-21 | 15.7±1.9 | 3.5±0.1 | 0.51±0.07 | 0.090±0.006 | 0.012±0.001 | 125±28 | 160±55 | 30±9 | 0.72±0.28 | 1933±638 |
|
| E13--10 | 15.3±1.5 | 3.6±0.1 | 0.49±0.07 | 0.110±0.026 | 0.014±0.001 | 140±44 | 188±74 | 38±17 | 0.58±0.18 | 1823±346 |
|
| 2203 | 17.3±1.4 | 4.0±0.2 | 0.54±0.05 | 0.138±0.049 | 0.018±0.001 | 143±18 | 124±45 | 57±22 | 0.43±0.06 | 1452±358 |
|
| ABC | 17.0±2.5 | 5.0±0.1 | 0.67±0.12 | 0.139±0.043 | 0.018±0.001 | 160±70 | 376±26 | 78±31 | 0.91±0.23 | 2238±668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ANOVA | |||||||||||
| Species | *** | *** | ns | *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** |
Data are shown as means±SD of 5–10 replicates. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ns, not significant at P=0.05 level. The data with different uppercase letters in each column were significant at P<0.05 level. 1/τ, rate of Rubisco activation; λ, initial lag time for the gs response; Asteady, steady-state photosynthetic rate; gcut, cuticular conductance; gs,initial, initial stomatal conductance; gs,max, maximum theoretical stomatal conductance; gs,steady, steady-state stomatal conductance; Slmax, maximum stomatal conductance increase rate; T50%A, times to 50% of the steady-state photosynthetic rate after shifting to high light; T50%gs, times to 50% of the steady-state stomatal conductance after shifting to high light.
Fig. 1.Effects of stomatal size at the abaxial (Saba) (A, C) and adaxial sides (Sada) (B, D) on maximum stomatal conductance increase rate (Slmax) and initial time lag (λ) for stomatal response across Oryza genotypes. Data are means ±SD of 5–10 replicates. The lines represent the regressions that are best fit for the data.
Fig. 2.The correlations of T50%gs with Slmax (A), λ (B), Saba (C) and Sada (D) across Oryza genotypes. λ, initial time lag for stomatal response; Saba, stomatal size at abaxial side; Sada, stomatal size at adaxial side; Slmax, maximum stomatal conductance increase rate. Data are means ±SD of 5–10 replicates. The lines represent the regressions that are best fit for the data.
Fig. 3.Effects of stomatal size at the abaxial (Saba) (A) and adaxial sides (Sada) (B) on initial stomatal conductance (gs,initial) across Oryza genotypes. Data are means ±SD of 5–10 replicates. The lines represent the regressions that are best fit for the data.
Fig. 4.Relationship between initial stomatal conductance (gs,initial) and initial time lag for the gs response (λ) across Oryza genotypes. Data are means ±SD of 5–10 replicates. The lines represent the regressions that are best fit for the data.
Fig. 5.The correlations of 1/τ with λ (A) and the rate of Ci depletion () (B) during the first 5 min of induction across Oryza genotypes. 1/τ, the rate of Rubisco activation; λ, initial time lag for the gs response. Data are means ±SD of 5–10 replicates. The lines represent the regressions that are best fit for the data.