Junhong Na1,2, Youngwook Kim1, Jurgen H Smet1, Marko Burghard1, Klaus Kern1,3. 1. Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research , Heisenbergstrasse 1 , D-70569 Stuttgart , Germany. 2. Department of Energy Science , Sungkyunkwan University , 16419 Suwon , Republic of Korea. 3. Institut de Physique , École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne , CH-1015 Lausanne , Switzerland.
Abstract
Tunneling field-effect transistors (TFETs) are of considerable interest owing to their capability of low-power operation. Here, we demonstrate a novel type of TFET which is composed of a thin black phosphorus-tin diselenide (BP-SnSe2) heterostructure. This combination of 2D semiconductor thin sheets enables device operation either as an Esaki diode featuring negative differential resistance (NDR) in the negative gate voltage regime or as a backward diode in the positive gate bias regime. Such tuning possibility is imparted by the fact that only the carrier concentration in the BP component can be effectively modulated by electrostatic gating, while the relatively high carrier concentration in the SnSe2 sheet renders it insensitive against gating. Scanning photocurrent microscopy maps indicate the presence of a staggered (type II) band alignment at the heterojunction. The temperature-dependent NDR behavior of the devices is explainable by an additional series resistance contribution from the individual BP and SnSe2 sheets connected in series. Moreover, the backward rectification behavior can be consistently described by the thermionic emission theory, pointing toward the gating-induced formation of a potential barrier at the heterojunction. It furthermore turned out that for effective Esaki diode operation, care has to be taken to avoid the formation of positive charges trapped in the alumina passivation layer.
Tunneling field-effect transistors (TFETs) are of considerable interest owing to their capability of low-power operation. Here, we demonstrate a novel type of TFET which is composed of a thin black phosphorus-tin diselenide (BP-SnSe2) heterostructure. This combination of 2D semiconductor thin sheets enables device operation either as an Esaki diode featuring negative differential resistance (NDR) in the negative gate voltage regime or as a backward diode in the positive gate bias regime. Such tuning possibility is imparted by the fact that only the carrier concentration in the BP component can be effectively modulated by electrostatic gating, while the relatively high carrier concentration in the SnSe2 sheet renders it insensitive against gating. Scanning photocurrent microscopy maps indicate the presence of a staggered (type II) band alignment at the heterojunction. The temperature-dependent NDR behavior of the devices is explainable by an additional series resistance contribution from the individual BP and SnSe2 sheets connected in series. Moreover, the backward rectification behavior can be consistently described by the thermionic emission theory, pointing toward the gating-induced formation of a potential barrier at the heterojunction. It furthermore turned out that for effective Esaki diode operation, care has to be taken to avoid the formation of positive charges trapped in the alumina passivation layer.
Entities:
Keywords:
2D van der Waals heterostructure; black phosphorus; negative differential resistance; tin diselenide; tunneling transistor
Modern
electronic applications require integrated circuits of substantially
reduced dynamic and static power consumption. However, the ultimate
device scaling of conventional metal–oxide field-effect transistors
faces its limits. As an alternative, tunneling field-effect transistors
(TFETs) are receiving increasing attention in particular because of
their potential low-power operation.[1−3] Recent research on TFETs
has focused on p–n homo- and heterojunctions based on Si, Ge,
and III–V materials.[4−8] In general, the device performance of heterojunction-based TFETs
has been proven to be superior to that of homojunction-based TFETs,
as the former typically exhibits a steep band edge at the junction
and furthermore allows selecting high mobility channel materials.[1,9] However, further progress along this direction is slowed down by
the significant lattice mismatch that often occurs in heterojunctions.Promising candidates for overcoming the lattice mismatch problem
are two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) materials which lack
dangling bonds on their surface.[10−12] In addition, the great
diversity of available 2D vdW materials enables efficient tailoring
of the device properties of TFETs.[13] However,
the realization of high-performance TFETs is still challenging due
to the low current density and device stability as limiting factors
in particular for vertical TFETs.[14] Another
relevant goal is to achieve an efficient and reliable gate-tuning
capability of the devices. To this end, a promising device component
is the 2D vdW material black phosphorus (BP) which features a high
carrier mobility in comparison to most transition-metal dichalcogenides
such as MoS2.[15−19] One suitable counterpart to BP is the 2D vdW semiconductor tin diselenide
(SnSe2), which displays a relatively high electron affinity
as one of the prerequisites for high device performance of TFETs.[20−24] In both its bulk and few-layer forms, SnSe2 is (unintentionally)
highly n-doped, thereby rendering it difficult to deplete charge carriers
by electrostatic gating.[20,25,26] By contrast, BP is only slightly p-doped, such that its carriers
can be readily tuned by electrostatic gating and/or dielectric passivation
in case of the few-layer form.[17,27,28] Thus far, BP–SnSe2 heterostructure diodes displaying
negative differential resistance (NDR) behavior have only been realized
in the bulk form.[29]Here, we demonstrate
that stacking of a gate-tunable thin BP sheet onto a thin SnSe2 sheet of high carrier density provides access to vertical
TFETs whose operation can be tuned via electrostatic gating between
a NDR and a backward diode mode, which at the same time exhibit a
NDR peak current of unprecedented magnitude. Furthermore, by combining
temperature-dependent charge transport experiments with scanning photocurrent
microscopy (SPCM), we are able to unravel the presence of a gate-tunable
type II staggered band alignment at the BP–SnSe2 heterojunction.
Results and Discussion
In Figure a, three subsequent
stages of device fabrication are shown, starting with a mechanically
exfoliated SnSe2 sheet (top panel), the same SnSe2 sheet after deterministic transfer of a BP sheet on top (middle
panel), and the final BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device
with metal electrodes and a Al2O3 passivation
deposited on top (bottom panel). The passivation layer is needed to
preserve the original structure and electronic properties of the BP
and SnSe2 sheets, as both slowly degrade in ambient air.[28,30] In general, the exposure of the BP and SnSe2 sheets to
ambient air was limited to several minutes before final device passivation.
As determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM), the thickness of the
BP and SnSe2 sheet is ∼8.5 and ∼12 nm, respectively
(Figure S1). Details of the device fabrication
process are provided in the Methods section.
The BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device is schematically
illustrated in Figure b. The corresponding output curves recorded under ambient conditions
at different gate voltages (−80, 0, and +80 V), shown in Figure c, signify a global
back-gating effect on the device. The output curve at Vgs = −80 V (red line) clearly features NDR, which
is indicative of band-to-band tunneling. In comparison, application
of the opposite gate bias (Vgs = +80 V)
resulted in a strongly different behavior, which is characteristic
of a backward diode (blue line). More Ids–Vds and Ids–Vgs data at different
gate voltages and drain–source voltages are offered in the Supporting Information. Hysteresis induced by
charge trapping/detrapping at the trap sites between the heterostructure
and gate oxide are observed in Figure S2, but this could not affect the main result associated with the heterojunction.
Figure 1
(a) Optical
images showing the fabrication of a heterostructure device, starting
from a thin SnSe2 sheet (top), followed by deterministic
transfer of a thin BP sheet on top (middle), then defining electrodes
by e-beam lithography and metal evaporation, and finally deposition
of an alumina layer by ALD (bottom). The scale bar is 10 μm.
(b) Schematic illustration of a finished thin BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device. (c) Output characteristics of the device
at Vgs = −80, 0, and +80 V, recorded
under ambient conditions.
(a) Optical
images showing the fabrication of a heterostructure device, starting
from a thin SnSe2 sheet (top), followed by deterministic
transfer of a thin BP sheet on top (middle), then defining electrodes
by e-beam lithography and metal evaporation, and finally deposition
of an alumina layer by ALD (bottom). The scale bar is 10 μm.
(b) Schematic illustration of a finished thin BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device. (c) Output characteristics of the device
at Vgs = −80, 0, and +80 V, recorded
under ambient conditions.To determine the type of band alignment at the BP–SnSe2 heterojunction, we used SPCM. This technique involves raster
scanning of the sample through a confocal laser spot, while the photocurrent
is recorded as a function of illumination position.[31] In Figure a, three SPCM maps of the device in Figure , obtained using different gate voltages,
are displayed. At zero drain-source and gate voltage (middle panel
of Figure a), a negative
photocurrent of approximately −17 nA is observed near the BP–SnSe2 heterojunction, pointing toward an energy band bending of
type II (staggered), as shown in the corresponding diagram of Figure b. The formation
of a tunneling barrier between the two types of layers (represented
by the two vertical black lines) is most likely due to native oxide
layers and/or organic residues from the mechanical transfer process.
That the band alignment is indeed of type II (staggered) rather than
type III (broken-gap) and is further supported by the negative photocurrent
observed at zero bias in the output curves (plot in the middle of Figure c). By contrast,
in close correspondence to a previous report on a bulk BP–SnSe2 heterojunction,[29] we observed
NDR behavior and positive photocurrent for a bulk BP–SnSe2 heterojunction device, implying type III (broken-gap) band
alignment in this case (see the Supporting Information for further details). First of all, this difference between the
bulk and few-layer heterostructure likely originates from a thickness-dependent
carrier density of BP, that is, a decreased doping concentration with
decreasing BP thickness.[32] In the device
comprising bulk BP, while the high carrier concentration principally
favors the TFET operation, the resulting poor gate controllability
is a significant drawback. Another plausible explanation of the difference
between the bulk and few-layer heterostructure is possible fixed charges
in the tunneling barrier. Note that in a III–V heterostructure
the band alignment change induced by the fixed charges at the heterojunction
has been reported.[33]
Figure 2
(a) SPCM maps of the
BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device in Figure , acquired at room temperature
with λ = 514 nm. The maps were recorded at Vds = 0 V and Vgs = −40
(top), 0 (middle), and +40 V (bottom). In each case, the corresponding
optical image of the device is overlaid. The blue and yellow dotted
lines mark the contours of the BP and SnSe2 sheet, while
“D” and “S” denote the drain and source
electrode, respectively. The size of each SPCM map is 7 μm ×
7 μm. (b) Band diagrams corresponding to the gating conditions
in panel (a). (c) Measured output characteristics at high negative
gate voltage (top), zero gate voltage (middle), and high positive
gate voltage (bottom). Ef denotes the
Fermi level position. For the zero gate voltage case (middle plot), Ids–Vds curves
were acquired in the dark and under illumination with different laser
powers of 4.2, 16.9, 67.7, and 142 μW, respectively.
(a) SPCM maps of the
BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device in Figure , acquired at room temperature
with λ = 514 nm. The maps were recorded at Vds = 0 V and Vgs = −40
(top), 0 (middle), and +40 V (bottom). In each case, the corresponding
optical image of the device is overlaid. The blue and yellow dotted
lines mark the contours of the BP and SnSe2 sheet, while
“D” and “S” denote the drain and source
electrode, respectively. The size of each SPCM map is 7 μm ×
7 μm. (b) Band diagrams corresponding to the gating conditions
in panel (a). (c) Measured output characteristics at high negative
gate voltage (top), zero gate voltage (middle), and high positive
gate voltage (bottom). Ef denotes the
Fermi level position. For the zero gate voltage case (middle plot), Ids–Vds curves
were acquired in the dark and under illumination with different laser
powers of 4.2, 16.9, 67.7, and 142 μW, respectively.Owing to the weak p-type doping of the thin BP
sheet, the SPCM response is influenced by the applied back-gate voltage,
as apparent from the photocurrent maps at the top and bottom of Figure a. Under zero drain–source
voltage and application of Vgs = −40
V (top map), an increased negative photocurrent emerges near the heterojunction
in the SPCM map. Such behavior indicates an upward energy band bending
of the BP induced by the highly p-doped BP channel, as illustrated
by the top diagram in Figure b. Under this condition, NDR behavior is observed in the forward
bias regime of the output curve (top panel of Figure c). That only the BP channel part is tunable
by the gate is confirmed by the observation that the heavily n-doped
SnSe2 channel, in contrast to the BP, cannot be turned
off by the gate voltage (see Figure S4 in the Supporting Information). The electron concentration in the
SnSe2 sheet can be estimated from the simple equation, n = σ/(μq), where n, σ, μ, and q are carrier concentration,
conductivity, carrier mobility, and electronic charge, respectively.
Thus, using the field-effect mobility in the SnSe2 sheet
extracted from the transfer curve, as described in the Supporting Information, an electron concentration
on the order of 1013 cm–2 is obtained
at zero gate voltage. Such high electron concentration is indeed expected
to hinder effective gating. Correspondingly, when a positive gate
bias of Vgs = +40 V is applied, a strong
positive photocurrent at the heterojunction appears (see bottom panel
of Figure a), which
is consistent with the resulting downward band bending in the BP channel,
as depicted in the bottom diagram in Figure b. Under this condition, a conventional Schottky
barrier is formed near the heterojunction, which in turn is responsible
for the backward diode behavior (bottom plot of Figure c).To evaluate the mechanism of charge
transport across the BP–SnSe2 p–n heterojunction,
we performed temperature-dependent electrical measurements at high
negative and positive gate voltages. The behavior in the NDR regime
at Vgs = −80 V is shown in Figure a for the temperature
range between 10 and 283 K. It is apparent that the peak current decreases
upon cooling, which is unexpected at first sight because of the reduced
tail of the Fermi–Dirac distribution function.[29,34] This temperature dependence of the peak current may be explained
by a sizable excess current associated with a two-step process involving
Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH) generation/recombination and
trap-assisted tunneling.[35,36] It is noteworthy that
for other materials such a decrease has been attributed to an increase
of the energy band gap with decreasing temperature.[37,38] However, the present BP displays an anomalous temperature dependence
of the band gap,[39] thus favoring the aforementioned
alternative explanation.
Figure 3
Temperature-dependent characteristics of the
BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device. (a) Ids–Vds curves at Vgs = −80 V, recorded at various temperatures
between 283 and 10 K. (b) Peak/valley voltages and PVCR as a function
of temperature, as extracted from the NDR features in panel (a). (c)
Two-probe resistances of the BP (RBP)
and SnSe2 (RSnSe) sheets and their sum (RBP + RSnSe) as a function of temperature.
The inset shows a simplified equivalent circuit of the device, comprising RBP, RSnSe, and a resistance at the BP–SnSe2 junction (Rjunction). (d) Ids–Vds curves at Vgs = +80 V for various temperatures between 283 and 10
K [analogous to panel (a)]. (e) Arrhenius plots of ln(Ids/T3/2) vs 1000/T, at Vgs = +80 V and in the negative
bias regime (Vds = −0.1, −0.2,
and −0.3 V). The straight lines represent linear fits. (f)
Extracted Schottky barrier heights for the BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device in the negative bias regime and the BP device,
both as a function of gate voltage.
Temperature-dependent characteristics of the
BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device. (a) Ids–Vds curves at Vgs = −80 V, recorded at various temperatures
between 283 and 10 K. (b) Peak/valley voltages and PVCR as a function
of temperature, as extracted from the NDR features in panel (a). (c)
Two-probe resistances of the BP (RBP)
and SnSe2 (RSnSe) sheets and their sum (RBP + RSnSe) as a function of temperature.
The inset shows a simplified equivalent circuit of the device, comprising RBP, RSnSe, and a resistance at the BP–SnSe2 junction (Rjunction). (d) Ids–Vds curves at Vgs = +80 V for various temperatures between 283 and 10
K [analogous to panel (a)]. (e) Arrhenius plots of ln(Ids/T3/2) vs 1000/T, at Vgs = +80 V and in the negative
bias regime (Vds = −0.1, −0.2,
and −0.3 V). The straight lines represent linear fits. (f)
Extracted Schottky barrier heights for the BP–SnSe2 heterostructure device in the negative bias regime and the BP device,
both as a function of gate voltage.The corresponding peak and valley voltages, along with the
peak-to-valley current ratio (PVCR), are plotted in Figure b as a function of temperature.
One plausible explanation for the observed overall trend of the peak
and valley voltage positions is the contribution of a series resistance
comprising an intrinsic and a contact-related component for each of
the two sheets. To test this hypothesis, we measured the individual
sheets’ two-probe resistance with the aid of additional electrodes
as shown at the bottom of Figure a (see the Supporting Information for more details). In Figure c, thus obtained temperature-dependent resistances (blue and
yellow data points, respectively) are plotted together with their
sum (black data points) at Vgs = −80
V. Based on the equivalent circuit in the inset of Figure c and assumption that the resistance
of the heterojunction (Rjunction) is insensitive
to temperature at low drain–source bias (because the carrier
injection is mostly the band-to-band tunneling process), the temperature
dependence of the effective voltage drop across the heterojunction
should be dominated by the temperature dependence of the series resistance.
The decrease of both peak and valley voltages upon cooling from 300
to ∼100 K, as observed in Figure b, can then be attributed to the decrease
of the series resistance within this temperature range. The subsequent
increase of the peak/valley voltage upon further cooling below ∼100
K is consistent with the increase of the series resistance in this
range. Likewise, the increase of PVCR with decreasing temperature,
reaching ∼1.75 at 10 K (Figure b), can be related to the reduced excess current at
lower temperatures. In general, the relatively small PVCR magnitude
indicates considerable excess current, similar to other tunneling
devices.[37,40] It may be possible to reduce the latter
through mechanical transfer of the sheets under inert atmosphere,
to ensure a cleaner interface.For the backward diode operation
regime at Vgs = +80 V, the temperature-dependent Ids–Vds curves
are shown in Figure d. The current decrease in the negative bias regime upon cooling
should be, according the bottom band diagram in Figure b, attributable to the forward bias regime
of a Schottky diode. To confirm this assumption, we analyzed the data
in the framework of classical thermionic emission theory (see the Supporting Information).[41,42] The Arrhenius plots of ln(Ids/T3/2) as a function of T–1, shown in Figure e, are linear for the three drain–source voltages
of −0.1, −0.2, and −0.3 V. The extracted Schottky
barrier height is plotted as a function of gate voltage in Figure f, along with the
value for the individual BP sheet. The Schottky barrier height determined
for the heterostructure is positive over the entire gate voltage regime,
with a reasonable value on the order of 150 meV. This observation
confirms the validity of the thermionic emission theory for the heterojunction
in the negative bias regime. On the other hand, the appearance of
a negative Schottky barrier height for the BP device above Vgs = +60 V shows that the thermionic emission
theory is invalid in the high gate voltage regime.[42]A major parameter governing the device performance
of TFETs is the subthreshold slope (SS). A comparison between the
SS of the present devices and values previously reported for other
2D material-based TFETs can be found in Table S1, which includes also further device parameters. Although
in the hole regime, the SS of the present heterostructure devices
falls below that of the BP-only device (see Figure S8), it remains above ∼4000 mV/dec. These relatively
large values can be attributed to the thick gate insulator (300 nm
SiO2), along with a sizable trap density at the interface
between the 2D sheets and gate insulator, which determine the SS according
to the equation SS = (1 + Cit/Cox) × k × T/q × ln 10, where Cit, Cox, k, T, and q are the interface trap
capacitance, gate oxide capacitance, Boltzmann constant, temperature,
and electronic charge, respectively. One option to further decrease
the SS would be to implement an ultrathin, high-κ gate insulator
with a high quality interface to the 2D sheets.As a further
observation of practical relevance, because of the small thickness
of the BP and SnSe2 sheets, the electrical behavior of
the heterostructure devices is influenced by the nature of the passivation
layer. Figure a shows
gate-dependent Ids–Vds curves of another BP–SnSe2 heterostructure
(device #2, see the Supporting Information for details), whose Al2O3 passivation layer
was grown at the higher temperature of 250 °C. In contrast to
the above described device (Figure ) with the Al2O3 passivation
layer grown at 100 °C, no NDR behavior is observed in the present
device, as apparent from Figure a. The Ohmic-like Ids–Vds curves, that are obtained by separate measurements
on the BP and SnSe2 sheets (see the Supporting Information), indicate that the non-Ohmic behavior
detected for the heterostructure arises due to the heterojunction.
One possible reason for the absence of NDR is that positive fixed
charges induced by oxygen vacancies in the Al2O3 layer (as depicted in the figure inset) hinder back gating, especially
close to the heterojunction. In fact, it has been documented that
sizeable oxygen vacancy densities can be induced with increasing growth
temperature of the Al2O3 layer, which could
in turn result in a larger density of fixed positive charge.[43,44] In comparison, when a PMMA layer is used for passivation, NDR behavior
is again observed in the negative gate voltage regime (see Figure b), like for the
device with the Al2O3 layer grown at 100 °C.
This finding is in accord with the absence of fixed surface charges
on PMMA, underlining the importance of properly choosing the passivation
layer and its fabrication conditions.
Figure 4
Effect of the nature of the passivation
layer in the BP–SnSe2 heterostructure devices. Output
characteristics for the case of (a) an Al2O3 passivation layer deposited at 250 °C and (b) a PMMA passivation
layer, in both cases for Vgs = −80,
0, and +80 V, respectively. The inset in panel (a) shows a schematic
diagram of the device, with fixed charges in the Al2O3 passivation layer.
Effect of the nature of the passivation
layer in the BP–SnSe2 heterostructure devices. Output
characteristics for the case of (a) an Al2O3 passivation layer deposited at 250 °C and (b) a PMMA passivation
layer, in both cases for Vgs = −80,
0, and +80 V, respectively. The inset in panel (a) shows a schematic
diagram of the device, with fixed charges in the Al2O3 passivation layer.
Conclusions
In summary, we have successfully fabricated
thin BP–SnSe2 p–n heterostructure devices
whose operation mode is tunable by electrostatic gating between the
NDR and backward diode regime. This tuning is enabled by the fact
that application of a global back-gate predominantly affects the thin
BP sheet because if its lower charge carrier density in comparison
to the SnSe2 sheets. Based on spatially resolved photocurrent
data, we conclude that the band alignment at the heterojunction is
of type II staggered. Furthermore, temperature-dependent electrical
measurements on the devices revealed that the charge transport across
the heterojunction occurs via a two-step process involving SRH generation/recombination
and trap-assisted tunneling in the high negative gate voltage regime,
and via thermionic emission in the high positive gate voltage regime.
In addition, growth of the required Al2O3 passivation
layer at elevated temperature was found to suppress the NDR behavior,
presumably because of fixed positive charges introduced at the interface.
Taken together, our observations provide several clues for the further
improvement of 2D vdW material-based tunneling devices.
Methods
The thin SnSe2 and BP sheets were
mechanically exfoliated from bulk crystals by the Scotch tape method
onto n+-doped silicon substrates deposited with a thermally
grown, 300 nm thick SiO2 layer and onto PDMS-based gel
(Gel-Pak), respectively.[45] A carefully
selected BP sheet on the PDMS-based gel was transferred by a deterministic
transfer method onto the SnSe2 sheet on the Si/SiO2 substrate. Contact electrodes were patterned by standard
e-beam lithography, followed by an in situ Ar plasma treatment, thermal
evaporation of the Ti/Au (2 nm/70 nm), and lift-off process. Atomic
layer deposition (ALD) (Cambridge Nanotech ALD system) was performed
with Al(CH3)3 and H2O as precursors
at 100 or 250 °C and a base pressure of 10 mTorr, to obtain a
20 nm thick Al2O3 passivation layer. Alternatively,
a 200 nm thick PMMA bilayer was spin-coated on the heterostructure.AFM was used to determine the thickness of the sheets. The electrical
transport and photocurrent measurements in Figures , 2, and 4 were carried out under ambient conditions. The
temperature-dependent charge transport experiments were performed
inside an Oxford cryostat. All of the electrical measurements
were performed in dc configuration using two Keithley 2400 source
meters and a Keithley 2000 multimeter. A confocal microscope (Leica
TCS SP2, 50× objective lens with NA = 0.8) was used for the SPCM
experiments, in which the samples were raster-scanned (lateral step
size of ∼100 nm) through the approximately 500 nm wide laser
spot (linearly polarized light with λ = 514 nm).