Literature DB >> 31145523

Prediction of significant estimated glomerular filtration rate decline after renal unit removal to aid in the clinical choice between radical and partial nephrectomy in patients with a renal mass and normal renal function.

Andrew G McIntosh1, Daniel C Parker2, Brian L Egleston1, Robert G Uzzo1, Mohammed Haseebuddin3, Shreyas S Joshi1, Rosalia Viterbo1, Richard E Greenberg1, David Y T Chen1, Marc C Smaldone1, Alexander Kutikov1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a clinically applicable predictive model to quantitate the risk of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline to ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2 after radical nephrectomy (RN) to better inform decisions between RN and partial nephrectomy (PN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our prospectively maintained kidney cancer registry was reviewed for patients with a preoperative eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who underwent RN for a localized renal mass. New baseline renal function was indexed. We used multivariable logistic regression to develop a predictive nomogram and evaluated it using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Decision-curve analysis was used to assess the net clinical benefit.
RESULTS: A total of 668 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 183 (27%) experienced a decline in eGFR to ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . On multivariable analysis, increasing age (P = 0.001), female gender (P < 0.001), and increasing preoperative creatinine level (P < 0.001) were associated with functional decline. We constructed a predictive nomogram that included these variables in addition to comorbidities with a known association with kidney disease, but found that a simplified model excluding comorbidities was equally robust (cross-validated area under the ROC curve was 0.78). Decision-curve analysis showed the net clinical benefit at probabilities >~11%.
CONCLUSIONS: The decision to perform RN vs PN is multifaceted. We have provided a simple quantitative tool to help identify patients at risk of a postoperative eGFR of ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2 , who may be stronger candidates for nephron preservation.
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #KidneyCancer; #kcsm; AUA guidelines; chronic kidney disease; estimated glomerular filtration rate; nomogram; radical nephrectomy; renal cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31145523      PMCID: PMC7654970          DOI: 10.1111/bju.14839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  29 in total

1.  A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hendrik Van Poppel; Luigi Da Pozzo; Walter Albrecht; Vsevolod Matveev; Aldo Bono; Andrzej Borkowski; Marc Colombel; Laurence Klotz; Eila Skinner; Thomas Keane; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Who really benefits from nephron-sparing surgery?

Authors:  Solomon L Woldu; Aaron C Weinberg; Ruslan Korets; Rashed Ghandour; Matthew R Danzig; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Sean D Kalloo; Mitchell C Benson; G Joel DeCastro; James M McKiernan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup.

Authors:  A F Fergany; K S Hafez; A C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Radical Versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Boris Gershman; R Houston Thompson; Stephen A Boorjian; Christine M Lohse; Brian A Costello; John C Cheville; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hendrik Van Poppel; Luigi Da Pozzo; Walter Albrecht; Vsevolod Matveev; Aldo Bono; Andrzej Borkowski; Jean-Marie Marechal; Laurence Klotz; Eila Skinner; Thomas Keane; Ilse Claessens; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Predicting Renal Function Outcomes After Partial and Radical Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bimal Bhindi; Christine M Lohse; Phillip J Schulte; Ross J Mason; John C Cheville; Stephen A Boorjian; Bradley C Leibovich; R Houston Thompson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Mir; Ithaar Derweesh; Francesco Porpiglia; Homayoun Zargar; Alexandre Mottrie; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Does partial nephrectomy result in a durable overall survival benefit in the Medicare population?

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Brian Egleston; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Body mass index and comorbidity are associated with postoperative renal function after nephrectomy.

Authors:  Lael Reinstatler; Zachary Klaassen; Brittani Barrett; Martha K Terris; Kelvin A Moses
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimizing prediction of new-baseline glomerular filtration rate after radical nephrectomy: are algorithms really necessary?

Authors:  Nityam Rathi; Yosuke Yasuda; Worapat Attawettayanon; Diego A Palacios; Yunlin Ye; Jianbo Li; Christopher Weight; Mohammed Eltemamy; Tarik Benidir; Robert Abouassaly; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Predicting GFR after radical nephrectomy: the importance of split renal function.

Authors:  Nityam Rathi; Diego A Palacios; Emily Abramczyk; Hajime Tanaka; Yunlin Ye; Jianbo Li; Yosuke Yasuda; Robert Abouassaly; Mohamed Eltemamy; Alvin Wee; Christopher Weight; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 3.  Role of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in the management of renal mass.

Authors:  Randall A Lee; David Strauss; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

4.  A Simple Clinical Tool for Stratifying Risk of Clinically Significant CKD after Nephrectomy: Development and Multinational Validation.

Authors:  Robert J Ellis; Sharon J Del Vecchio; Kevin M J Gallagher; Danielle N Aliano; Neil Barber; Damien M Bolton; Etienne T S Chew; Jeff S Coombes; Michael D Coory; Ian D Davis; James F Donaldson; Ross S Francis; Graham G Giles; Glenda C Gobe; Carmel M Hawley; David W Johnson; Alexander Laird; Steve Leung; Manar Malki; David J T Marco; Alan S McNeill; Rachel E Neale; Keng L Ng; Simon Phipps; Grant D Stewart; Victoria M White; Simon T Wood; Susan J Jordan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Acute Kidney Injury Adjusted for Parenchymal Mass Reduction and Long-Term Renal Function after Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Ho-Jin Lee; Seokha Yoo; Sun-Kyung Park; Yongsuk Kwon; Kwanghoon Jun; Chang Wook Jeong; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.