Literature DB >> 3114532

DNA adducts, protein adducts, and sister chromatid exchange in cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.

F P Perera, R M Santella, D Brenner, M C Poirier, A A Munshi, H K Fischman, J Van Ryzin.   

Abstract

In order to validate markers of internal dose and biologically effective dose of carcinogens, a battery of measurements was made on blood samples from 22 smokers and 24 nonsmokers. The markers included immunoreactivity in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantified in white blood cells with the use of a polyclonal anti-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-I-DNA antibody, 4-aminobiphenyl hemoglobin (4-ABP-Hb) adducts measured by negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry, sister chromatid exchange (SCE) in cultured lymphocytes, and cotinine in plasma measured by radioimmunoassay. Several blood samples were drawn from each subject. In blood samples 1 and 3 having detectable levels of DNA adducts, mean femtomole-per-microgram levels were consistently higher among smokers compared to nonsmokers. The borderline significance of this difference may be attributable to the small numbers of subjects. Consistently higher adduct levels were seen in females compared to males. In sample 3, adduct levels were significantly correlated with measurements of active smoking in smokers and with passive smoking in nonsmokers. By contrast to the ELISA data, which may reflect cumulative exposure from multiple background sources, the 4-ABP-Hb assay was able to distinguish clearly between smokers and nonsmokers. SCEs were significantly elevated in the smokers compared to nonsmokers. Also observed were significant correlations between 4-ABP-Hb and both cotinine and SCEs, as well as a positive correlation between the 4-ABP-Hb and DNA adduct levels (sample 3) that was highly significant. The correlation between DNA and 4-ABP-Hb adducts was significant in smokers but not nonsmokers (sample 3). These results support the need for batteries of markers to detect and to quantify the carcinogenic dose to humans resulting from both specific and "background" environmental exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3114532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  21 in total

1.  Assessment of genotoxicity amongst smokers, alcoholics, and tobacco chewers of North India using micronucleus assay and urinary 8-hydroxyl-2'-deoxyguanosine, as biomarkers.

Authors:  S V S Rana; Yeshvandra Verma; Gagan Deep Singh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Biological monitoring of foundry workers exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  D Sherson; P Sabro; T Sigsgaard; F Johansen; H Autrup
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1990-07

3.  Chronic, topical exposure to benzo[a]pyrene induces relatively high steady-state levels of DNA adducts in target tissues and alters kinetics of adduct loss.

Authors:  G Talaska; M Jaeger; R Reilman; T Collins; D Warshawsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lack of association of delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase genotype with cytogenetic damage in lead workers.

Authors:  Fang-Yang Wu; Pao-Wen Chang; Chin-Ching Wu; Jim-Shoung Lai; Hsien-Wen Kuo
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Hydroxyethylvaline adduct formation in haemoglobin as a biological monitor of cigarette smoke intake.

Authors:  E Bailey; A G Brooks; C T Dollery; P B Farmer; B J Passingham; M A Sleightholm; D W Yates
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Biomonitoring of hemoglobin adducts: aromatic amines and tobacco-specific nitrosamines.

Authors:  B Falter; C Kutzer; E Richter
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1994-05

7.  Monitoring human exposure to carcinogens by DNA adduct measurement.

Authors:  R M Santella
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.691

8.  Hemoglobin adducts of aromatic amines: associations with smoking status and type of tobacco.

Authors:  M S Bryant; P Vineis; P L Skipper; S R Tannenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  A Cerioli
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Occupational Settings: Effect and Susceptibility Biomarkers in Workers From Lisbon Restaurants and Bars.

Authors:  Nádia Vital; Susana Antunes; Henriqueta Louro; Fátima Vaz; Tânia Simões; Deborah Penque; Maria João Silva
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.