Ziwa Yu1,2, Audrey Steenbeek1,2,3, Marilyn Macdonald1,2, Cathy MacDonald4, Shelley McKibbon2,5. 1. School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. 2. Aligning Health Needs with Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence. 3. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. 4. Rankin School of Nursing, Saint Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada. 5. W.K. Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to identify the characteristics of Indigenous healing strategies in Canada and approaches to improving cultural relevance to local Indigenous contexts. INTRODUCTION: In the previous 150 years, Indigenous peoples of Canada have experienced colonization, forced assimilation, cultural oppression and violence, and these are associated with high rates of social distress and health disparities. Today, legacies of colonization continue to marginalize Indigenous peoples, creating healthcare institutions devoid of Indigenous worldviews. Despite the growing number of Indigenous healing strategies currently in existence, literature describing these strategies has not been systematically scoped. To address this gap, this scoping review will identify characteristics of Indigenous healing strategies in Canada, and explore culturally relevant approaches used in research process. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider literature that describes Indigenous healing strategies in Canada and will include First Nations, Inuit and Métis as the population of interest. Strategies may include, but are not limited to, health services and programs, policies and guidelines, models and frameworks, and Indigenous narratives and expert opinions. Healing strategies delivered in all service settings are eligible for inclusion. METHODS: The databases/sources to be searched will include: CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Academic Search Premier. Searches for gray literature will be conducted in iPortal, Canadian Electronic Library, and a list of Canadian government and Indigenous organization websites. Retrieval of full-text studies and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Findings will be summarized in tabular forms accompanied by narrative text.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to identify the characteristics of Indigenous healing strategies in Canada and approaches to improving cultural relevance to local Indigenous contexts. INTRODUCTION: In the previous 150 years, Indigenous peoples of Canada have experienced colonization, forced assimilation, cultural oppression and violence, and these are associated with high rates of social distress and health disparities. Today, legacies of colonization continue to marginalize Indigenous peoples, creating healthcare institutions devoid of Indigenous worldviews. Despite the growing number of Indigenous healing strategies currently in existence, literature describing these strategies has not been systematically scoped. To address this gap, this scoping review will identify characteristics of Indigenous healing strategies in Canada, and explore culturally relevant approaches used in research process. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider literature that describes Indigenous healing strategies in Canada and will include First Nations, Inuit and Métis as the population of interest. Strategies may include, but are not limited to, health services and programs, policies and guidelines, models and frameworks, and Indigenous narratives and expert opinions. Healing strategies delivered in all service settings are eligible for inclusion. METHODS: The databases/sources to be searched will include: CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Academic Search Premier. Searches for gray literature will be conducted in iPortal, Canadian Electronic Library, and a list of Canadian government and Indigenous organization websites. Retrieval of full-text studies and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Findings will be summarized in tabular forms accompanied by narrative text.
Authors: Danielle Pollock; Ellen L Davies; Micah D J Peters; Andrea C Tricco; Lyndsay Alexander; Patricia McInerney; Christina M Godfrey; Hanan Khalil; Zachary Munn Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.187