Xin Li1,2, Charalambos C Charalambous1,3, Darcy S Reisman1,2, Susanne M Morton1,2. 1. a Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware , Newark , DE , USA. 2. b Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware , Newark , DE , USA. 3. c Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine , New York , NY , USA.
Abstract
Background: Acute exercise can increase motor cortical excitability and enhance motor learning in healthy individuals, an effect known as exercise priming. Whether it has the same effects in people with stroke is unclear. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate whether a short, clinically-feasible high-intensity exercise protocol can increase motor cortical excitability in non-exercised muscles of chronic stroke survivors. Methods:Thirteen participants with chronic, unilateral stroke participated in two sessions, at least one week apart, in a crossover design. In each session, they underwent either high-intensity lower extremity exercise or quiet rest. Motor cortical excitability of the extensor carpi radialis muscles was measured bilaterally with transcranial magnetic stimulation before and immediately after either exercise or rest. Motor cortical excitability changes (post-exercise or rest measures normalized to pre-test measures) were compared between exercise vs. rest conditions. Results: All participants were able to reach the target high-intensity exercise level. Blood lactate levels increased significantly after exercise (p < .001, d = 2.85). Resting motor evoked potentials from the lesioned hemisphere increased after exercise (mean 1.66; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.13) compared to the rest condition (mean 1.23; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.82), p = .046, d = 2.76, but this was not the case for the non-lesioned hemisphere (p = .406, d = 0.25). Conclusions: High-intensity exercise can increase lesioned hemisphere motor cortical excitability in a non-exercised muscle post-stroke. Our short and clinically-advantageous exercise protocol shows promise as a potential priming method in stroke rehabilitation.
RCT Entities:
Background: Acute exercise can increase motor cortical excitability and enhance motor learning in healthy individuals, an effect known as exercise priming. Whether it has the same effects in people with stroke is unclear. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate whether a short, clinically-feasible high-intensity exercise protocol can increase motor cortical excitability in non-exercised muscles of chronic stroke survivors. Methods: Thirteen participants with chronic, unilateral stroke participated in two sessions, at least one week apart, in a crossover design. In each session, they underwent either high-intensity lower extremity exercise or quiet rest. Motor cortical excitability of the extensor carpi radialis muscles was measured bilaterally with transcranial magnetic stimulation before and immediately after either exercise or rest. Motor cortical excitability changes (post-exercise or rest measures normalized to pre-test measures) were compared between exercise vs. rest conditions. Results: All participants were able to reach the target high-intensity exercise level. Blood lactate levels increased significantly after exercise (p < .001, d = 2.85). Resting motor evoked potentials from the lesioned hemisphere increased after exercise (mean 1.66; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.13) compared to the rest condition (mean 1.23; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.82), p = .046, d = 2.76, but this was not the case for the non-lesioned hemisphere (p = .406, d = 0.25). Conclusions: High-intensity exercise can increase lesioned hemisphere motor cortical excitability in a non-exercised muscle post-stroke. Our short and clinically-advantageous exercise protocol shows promise as a potential priming method in stroke rehabilitation.
Authors: Ashleigh E Smith; Mitchell R Goldsworthy; Tessa Garside; Fiona M Wood; Michael C Ridding Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Charalambos C Charalambous; Carolina C Alcantara; Margaret A French; Xin Li; Kathleen S Matt; Hyosub E Kim; Susanne M Morton; Darcy S Reisman Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Bernward Winter; Caterina Breitenstein; Frank C Mooren; Klaus Voelker; Manfred Fobker; Anja Lechtermann; Karsten Krueger; Albert Fromme; Catharina Korsukewitz; Agnes Floel; Stefan Knecht Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Jukka Kemppainen; Sargo Aalto; Toshihiko Fujimoto; Kari K Kalliokoski; Jaakko Långsjö; Vesa Oikonen; Juha Rinne; Pirjo Nuutila; Juhani Knuuti Journal: J Physiol Date: 2005-07-21 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Lynden Rodrigues; Kevin Moncion; Janice J Eng; Kenneth S Noguchi; Elise Wiley; Bernat de Las Heras; Shane N Sweet; Joyce Fung; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Aimee J Nelson; Diogo Medeiros; Jennifer Crozier; Alexander Thiel; Ada Tang; Marc Roig Journal: Trials Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Jenin El-Sayes; Claudia V Turco; Lauren E Skelly; Mitchell B Locke; Martin J Gibala; Aimee J Nelson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrea Hung; Marc Roig; Jenna B Gillen; Catherine M Sabiston; Walter Swardfager; Joyce L Chen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 4.379