Ding Zhao1, Dong-Feng Han2, Si-Si Wang3, Bing Lv2, Xu Wang4, Chi Ma5. 1. 1 Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. 2. 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. 3. 3 Department of Translational Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. 4. 4 Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. 5. 5 Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone cancer; TRPA1; cytokines; mechanical hyperalgesia; thermal hyperalgesia
Pain is one of the most common and distressing symptoms suffered by patients with
progression of cancer.[1] Cancer pain mainly arises from a tumor compressing or infiltrating tissue,
from nerve and other changes caused by a hormone imbalance or immune response, and
so on.[2] Of note, cancerous cells can originate in a number of different tissues such
as prostate, breast, and lung. Many types of cancers have a propensity to
metastasize to the bone microenvironment.[2,3] Tumor burden within the bone
causes excruciating breakthrough pain with properties of ongoing pain that is
inadequately managed with current analgesics. Treatment options for bone cancer pain
have been limited, partly due to our poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms
responsible for pain.Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) plays a functional role in regulating
pain and neurogenic inflammation resulting from channel activation to a variety of
compounds including pungent agents, irritant chemicals, reactive oxygen, and
products of oxidative stress-induced lipid peroxidation.[4] TRPA1 is presented in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons[5] and is engaged in the development of mechanical hypersensitivity and
temperature sensitive pain.[6,7]
TRPA1 has also been reported to mediate mechanical hyperalgesia and thermal
hypersensitivity in numerous models of neuropathic pain.[4-6] Thus, in this report, we
postulated that sensory TRPA1 plays a role in regulating mechanical and thermal
sensitivity in bone cancerrats induced by implanting breast sarcocarcinoma Walker
256 cells into the tibia bone cavity. We hypothesized that bone cancer amplifies
protein expression of TRPA1 in the DRG, and this thereby results in mechanical
hyperalgesia and thermal hypersensitivity. We further hypothesized that blocking
TRPA1 attenuates mechanical hyperalgesia and thermal hypersensitivity observed in
bone cancer.Moreover, chronic neuro-inflammation is one of the hallmarks in regulating
neuropathic pain.[8,9]
Studies in neuropathic pain of humanpatients and experimental animals show that
activation of glial cells and elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (PICs; i.e.,
tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-6) are common features of
neuropathic pain.[10-12] The releases
of PICs by stimulated astrocytes and microglia lead to the exacerbation of neuronal
cells in the DRG and pain regulation-related central regions.[10-12] Infiltration and accumulated
immune cells from the periphery are also identified in and around the affected
peripheral nerves and central regions of animal models with neuropathic pain.[9]In particular, TNF-α mediates mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in the development
of inflammation.[13] It has also been reported that TNF-α induces pain through the release of
inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins sensitizing ion channels.[14] A direct sensitization effect of TNF-α on voltage-gated sodium channels has
been observed in neuronal cells.[15] TNF-α treatment also results in an upregulation of TRPA1 expression in
sensory neurons.[16] In addition, evidence suggests that endogenous activation of peripheral TRPA1
receptors plays a critical role in the development of TNFα‐induced mechanical
hyperalgesia and in sustaining the mechanical hyperalgesia observed after
intra-articular injection of Freund’s complete adjuvant in rats.[17] Moreover, it has been reported that IL-6 can cause mechanical hyperalgesia
via increased PIC production (i.e., TNF-α).[18] The release of hyperalgesic mediators, that is, prostaglandins, occurs
subsequent to the release of cytokines. Mechanical hyperalgesia induced by IL-6 is
reduced by a pre-inhibition of prostaglandin production.[18] Also, IL-6 has been shown to upregulate the expression or activation of TRPA1
and knockdown of IL-6 signal transducing receptor subunits glycoprotein-130 (gp130)
decreases mRNA expression of TRPA1 in sensory neurons.[19,20]Thus, in this study, we postulated that TNF-α and IL-6 signal pathways are
upregulated in the DRG of bone cancerrats. We further examined the effects of
inhibition of TNF-α and IL-6 signals on protein expression of TRPA1 in the DRG and
on mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity inbone cancerrats. We hypothesized that
inhibition of TNF-α attenuates intracellular p38-MAPK and JNK signals in the DRG and
thereby decreases the protein levels of TRPA1, which further alleviates bone
cancer-induced mechanical hyperalgesia and thermal hyperalgesia. Likewise, blocking
IL-6 attenuates expression levels of TRPA1 via p38-MAPK and JNK in the DRG, thereby
improving bone cancer-induced mechanical and thermal pain.
Materials and methods
Animals
All animal protocols were in accordance with the guidelines of the International
Association for the Study of Pain and approved by the Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee of Jilin University. Adult male Wistar rats (200–250 g) were
housed in individual cages with free access to food and water and were kept in a
temperature-controlled room (25°C) on a 12/12 h light/dark cycle.
A model of bone cancer pain
Wister ratbreast sarcocarcinoma Walker 256 cells were prepared as described previously.[21] Briefly, Walker 256 cells (2 × 107 in 0.5 ml) were injected
into the abdominal cavity of the rats. Seven to 14 days later, the produced
ascites (approximately 50–150 ml) were collected and centrifuged at 1000 g for
5 min. The cells in the ascites were washed three times with 10 ml D-Hank’s
solution and diluted to a final concentration of 2 × 107 cells/ml.
The cells were then kept on ice before being used.The bone cancer pain model was established by inoculating Walker 256 cells to the
tibia of the rats as described previously.[21] Briefly, the rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (45 mg/kg,
intraperitoneal (i.p.)) and the lower one-third of the tibia was exposed. Each
of rats was injected with 1 × 105 Walker 256 cells in 5 μl Hank’s
solution into the right tibia of the hind paw, and the injection site was closed
using bone wax to prevent cell leakage. Rats that underwent the same surgical
procedures and received the same volume of vehicle served as the sham
controls.
Administration of drugs
Two weeks after inoculation of cancer cells, a TNF-α synthesis inhibitor,
pentoxifylline (PTX, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg body weight; Sigma), and SC144, an
inhibitor to complexed IL-6R-gp130 (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg body weight; Sigma),
were given i.p., individually, each day for three consecutive days. In the same
manner, TRPA1 antagonist HC030031 (1, 3, 10, mg/kg body weight; Sigma) was
administrated i.p. each day for the following three consecutive days.
Behavioral test
To quantify the mechanical sensitivity of the hindpaw, rats were placed in
individual plastic boxes and allowed to acclimate for >30 min. Mechanical paw
withdrawal threshold (PWT) of rat hindpaw in response to the stimulation of von
Frey filaments was determined. A series of calibrated von Frey filaments
(ranging from 0.5 to 15.0 g) were applied perpendicularly to the plantar surface
of the hindpaw with an appropriate force to bend the filaments until paw
withdrew. Note that the filaments were bent for 5–10 s in our protocols, and in
general, they can be bent sufficiently for ∼60 s. In the presence of a response,
the filament of next lower force was applied. In the absence of a response, the
filament of next greater force was applied. To avoid injury during tests, the
cutoff strength of the von Frey filament was 15 g. The tactile stimulus
producing a 50% likelihood of withdrawal was determined using the “up-down”
method.[22-24] Each trial
was repeated two times at approximately 2-min intervals. The mean value was used
as the force produced a withdrawal response.To determine thermal hyperalgesia, rat paw withdrawal latency (PWL) to a radiant
heat was measured.[24,25] Rats were placed individually in plastic cages on an
elevated glass platform and allowed for 30-min acclimation. Each hind paw
received three stimuli with a 10-min interval, and the mean of the three
withdrawal latencies was defined as PWL. The heat was maintained at a constant
intensity. To prevent tissue damage, the cutoff latency was set at 20 s. Note
that all the behavioral tests were performed in a blind manner in this report to
prevent experimental bias. In all the behavioral tests, the experimenter had no
knowledge about the treatments that the rats had received.No significant mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia were observed in control rats.
As compared with controls, significant mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia were
developed within a week after implantation of Walker 256 cells into the tibial
canal of rats and lasted for four weeks. Previous studies also showed that the
tumor occupies >90% of the intramedullary space on the day 14 following inoculation.[21] Accordingly, the rats were subjected to the next experiments two weeks
after inoculation of cancer cells.
ELISA measurements
All the tissues from individual rats were sampled for the analysis. In brief, DRG
tissues (L4–L6) of the rats were removed. Total protein was then extracted by
homogenizing the sample in ice-cold immunoprecipitation assay buffer with
protease inhibitor cocktail kit (Promega Co., Madison, WI). The lysates were
centrifuged, and the supernatants were collected for measurements of protein
concentrations using a bicinchoninic acid assay reagent kit.The levels of TNF-α were examined using an ELISA assay kit (Wuhan Fine Biotech
Co., Wuhan, China) according to the provided description. Briefly, polystyrene
96-well microtitel immunoplates were coated with affinity-purified rabbit
anti-TNF-α antibodies. Parallel wells were coated with purified rabbit IgG for
evaluation of nonspecific signal. After overnight incubation, plates were
washed. The diluted samples and TNF-α standard solutions were distributed in
each plate. The plates were washed and incubated with anti-TNF-α galactosidase.
The plates were washed and incubated with substrate solution. After incubation,
the optical density was measured using an ELISA reader with 575 nm of
wavelength. In the similar way, the levels of IL-6 were examined using an ELISA
assay kit (Wuhan Fine Biotech Co.)
Western blot analysis
Briefly, DRG tissues (L4–L6) were removed, and total protein was extracted. The
lysates were centrifuged, and the supernatants were collected. After being
denatured, the supernatant samples containing 20 μg of protein were loaded onto
gels and electrically transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. The
membrane was incubated overnight with primary antibodies (diluted at 1:500):
rabbit anti-TRPA1 (1:500, Novus Bio, NB100-91319), anti-TNFR1 (1:500; Abcam
#ab90463), anti-IL-6R (1:500; Abcam#ab103798), anti-p-p38-MAPK (1:500; USBio,
USB#403230)/p38-MAPK (1:500; USBio, USB#403226), anti-p-JNK1(1:500; Abcam
#ab47337)/JNK1 (1:500; Abcam #ab213521). The membranes were washed and incubated
with an alkaline phosphatase conjugated antirabbit secondary antibody (1:1000).
The primary and secondary antibodies were obtained from Abcam Co. or Antibodies
online Com. The immunoreactive proteins were detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence. The bands recognized by the primary antibody were visualized
by exposure of the membrane onto an X-ray film. The membrane was stripped and
incubated with anti-β-actin to show equal loading of the protein. The film was
then scanned, and the optical density of
TRPA1/TNFR1/IL-6R//p-p38-MAPK/p38-MAPK/p-JNK1/JNK1/β-actin bands was analyzed
using the NIH Scion Image software.
Statistical analysis
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze data for ELISA and
western blots and two-way repeated ANOVA was used to analyze data for mechanical
and thermal pain responses, and Tukey’s post hoc tests were used as appropriate.
Values were presented as means ± standard error of mean. For all analyses,
differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. All
statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS for Windows version 13.0 (SPSS
Inc.).
Results
Pain responses to mechanical and thermal stimuli after bone cancer
Bone cancer induced long-lasting pain behaviors in rats that were indicated by
significantly increased mechanical and thermal sensitivity (Figure 1(a)). Mechanical allodynia and
thermal hyperalgesia were observed within a week after injection of Walker 256
cells and lasted for four weeks (P < 0.05 vs. control
animals, n = 12 in each group). Note that no behavioral test was performed more
than four weeks after the cell implantation in this experiment. Thus, in the
next experiments, the rats with two weeks of inoculation of cancer cells were
used to examine the effects of TNF-α-TRPA1 and IL-6-TRPA1 signal pathways on
neuropathic pain.
Figure 1.
(a) Mechanical and thermal sensitivity in control rats and bone cancer
rats. With the development of bone cancer, PWT and PWL were decreased in
cancer rats as compared with control rats. Significant mechanical and
thermal hyperalgesia appeared one week after inoculation of cancer cells
(*P < 0.05 vs. control rats, n = 12 in each
group). (b) The levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the DRG were amplified in
bone cancer rats after two weeks of inoculation of cancer cells as
compared with control rats (P < 0.05, cancer rats
vs. control rats, n = 15 in each group). (c) Bone cancer also increased
protein expression of TNFR1, IL-6R, and TRPA1 as compared with control
rats (P < 0.05, cancer rats vs. control rats,
n = 6–8 in each group). Top panel is typical bands and bottom panels are
averaged data. IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-6R: IL-6 receptor; TNF-α: tumor
necrosis factor-α; TNFR1: TNF-α receptor; TRPA1: transient receptor
potential ankyrin 1.
(a) Mechanical and thermal sensitivity in control rats and bone cancerrats. With the development of bone cancer, PWT and PWL were decreased in
cancerrats as compared with control rats. Significant mechanical and
thermal hyperalgesia appeared one week after inoculation of cancer cells
(*P < 0.05 vs. control rats, n = 12 in each
group). (b) The levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the DRG were amplified in
bone cancerrats after two weeks of inoculation of cancer cells as
compared with control rats (P < 0.05, cancerrats
vs. control rats, n = 15 in each group). (c) Bone cancer also increased
protein expression of TNFR1, IL-6R, and TRPA1 as compared with control
rats (P < 0.05, cancerrats vs. control rats,
n = 6–8 in each group). Top panel is typical bands and bottom panels are
averaged data. IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-6R: IL-6 receptor; TNF-α: tumor
necrosis factor-α; TNFR1: TNF-α receptor; TRPA1: transient receptor
potential ankyrin 1.
Expression of TNF-α/IL-6/TRPA1 signal pathways in sensory neurons
In this experiment, DRG tissues were removed two weeks after inoculation of
cancer cells. Figure
1(b) demonstrates that bone cancer amplified the levels of TNF-α and
IL-6 in the DRG as compared with control rats (P < 0.05,
cancerrats vs. control rats, n = 15 in each group). Figure 1(c) further shows that bone
cancer increased protein expression of TNFR1 (a subtype TNF-α receptor), IL-6R,
and TRPA1 as compared with control rats (P < 0.05, cancerrats vs. control rats, n = 6–8 in each group).
Effects of blocking TNF-α on mechanical and thermal sensitivity
We further examined the role played by inhibition of TNF-α in modifying
mechanical and thermal sensitivity. Figure 2 shows that PWT and PWL appeared
to be less in cancerrats without treatment than them in control rats. Injection
of PTX attenuated mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in cancerrats by
showing increases of PWT and PWL as compared to the group with no treatment
(P < 0.05, PTX treatment vs. no treatment). The
inhibitory effects of PTX (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg) on mechanical and thermal
sensitivity appeared in a dose-dependent way. The accumulated effects of PTX
were also observed two to three days after administration of PTX.
Figure 2. Effects of blocking TNF-α on mechanical and thermal
sensitivity. TNF-α was inhibited by PTX (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg body
weight; i.p. each day over three consecutive days). PWT and PWL were
smaller in bone cancer rats without treatment. As PTX was given, PWT and
PWL were increased in a dose-dependent way.
#P < 0.05 versus control rats.
*P < 0.05 versus no treatment and other dosages.
**P < 0.05, indicated as the same dose of PTX
among different days. The number of animals is 8 in control rats and 12
in bone cancer rats without treatment. The number of bone cancer rats
with injection of PTX is 8 (10 mg/kg), 6 (20 mg/kg), and 9 (40 mg/kg).
PTX: pentoxifylline.
Figure 2. Effects of blocking TNF-α on mechanical and thermal
sensitivity. TNF-α was inhibited by PTX (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg body
weight; i.p. each day over three consecutive days). PWT and PWL were
smaller in bone cancerrats without treatment. As PTX was given, PWT and
PWL were increased in a dose-dependent way.
#P < 0.05 versus control rats.
*P < 0.05 versus no treatment and other dosages.
**P < 0.05, indicated as the same dose of PTX
among different days. The number of animals is 8 in control rats and 12
in bone cancerrats without treatment. The number of bone cancerrats
with injection of PTX is 8 (10 mg/kg), 6 (20 mg/kg), and 9 (40 mg/kg).
PTX: pentoxifylline.
Effects of blocking IL-6 signal on mechanical and thermal sensitivity
We also examined the role played by inhibition of IL-6 in mechanical and thermal
sensitivity. Figure 3
shows that PWT and PWL appeared to be smaller in cancerrats with no treatment
than them in control rats. This figure further shows that injection of SC144 (5,
10, 20 mg/kg) attenuated mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in cancerrats
as compared with the group of no treatment (P < 0.05, SC144
treatment vs. no treatment). The inhibitory effects of SC144 on mechanical and
thermal sensitivity appeared in a dose-dependent way. The accumulated effects of
SC144 were also observed two to three days after administration of SC144.
Figure 3.
Effects of blocking IL-6 signal on mechanical and thermal sensitivity.
IL-6R was inhibited by SC144 (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg body weight; i.p. each
day over three consecutive days). PWT and PWL were smaller in bone
cancer rats without treatment than in control rats. SC144 increased PWT
and PWL in bone cancer rats as compared with no treatment. The effects
of SC144 appeared in a dose-dependent way.
#P < 0.05 versus control rats.
*P < 0.05 versus no treatment and other dosages.
**P < 0.05, indicated as the same dose of SC144
among different days. The number of animals is 10 in control rats and 12
in bone cancer rats without treatment. The number of bone cancer rats
with injection of SC144 is 6 (5 mg/kg), 8 (10 mg/kg), and 8
(20 mg/kg).
Effects of blocking IL-6 signal on mechanical and thermal sensitivity.
IL-6R was inhibited by SC144 (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg body weight; i.p. each
day over three consecutive days). PWT and PWL were smaller in bone
cancerrats without treatment than in control rats. SC144 increased PWT
and PWL in bone cancerrats as compared with no treatment. The effects
of SC144 appeared in a dose-dependent way.
#P < 0.05 versus control rats.
*P < 0.05 versus no treatment and other dosages.
**P < 0.05, indicated as the same dose of SC144
among different days. The number of animals is 10 in control rats and 12
in bone cancerrats without treatment. The number of bone cancerrats
with injection of SC144 is 6 (5 mg/kg), 8 (10 mg/kg), and 8
(20 mg/kg).
Effects of blocking TRPA1 on mechanical and thermal sensitivity
Figure 4 shows that PWT
and PWL appeared to be smaller in cancerrats without treatment than them in
control rats. This figure also demonstrates that PWT and PWL were increased in a
dose-dependent way after injection of HC030031 (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) in bone
cancerrats (P < 0.05, HC030031 treatment vs. no treatment).
The accumulated effects of HC030031 were also observed after administration of
HC030031.
Figure 4.
Effects of blocking TRPA1 on mechanical and thermal sensitivity. TRPA1
was blocked by administration of HC030031 (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg body
weight; i.p. each day over three consecutive days). PWT and PWL
decreased in bone cancer rats with no treatment. Injection of HC030031
increased PWT and PWL in bone cancer rats as compared to the group with
no treatment. #P < 0.05 versus control
rats. *P < 0.05 versus no treatment and other
dosages. **P < 0.05, indicated as the same dose of
HC030031 among different days. The number of animals is 12 in each group
for control rats and for bone cancer rats without treatment. The number
of bone cancer rats with injection of HC030031 is 8 in each group for
three dosages (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg).
Effects of blocking TRPA1 on mechanical and thermal sensitivity. TRPA1
was blocked by administration of HC030031 (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg body
weight; i.p. each day over three consecutive days). PWT and PWL
decreased in bone cancerrats with no treatment. Injection of HC030031
increased PWT and PWL in bone cancerrats as compared to the group with
no treatment. #P < 0.05 versus control
rats. *P < 0.05 versus no treatment and other
dosages. **P < 0.05, indicated as the same dose of
HC030031 among different days. The number of animals is 12 in each group
for control rats and for bone cancerrats without treatment. The number
of bone cancerrats with injection of HC030031 is 8 in each group for
three dosages (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg).
Effects of blocking TNF-α/IL-6 on TRPA1 signal leading to neuropathic
pain
The effects of TNF-α and IL-6 on TRPA1 signal pathway were examined in additional
groups. In this experiment, DRG tissues were removed three days after the
beginning injection of PTX and SC144. Figure 5(a) demonstrates that bone cancer
amplified TRPA1 as compared with control rats (P < 0.05,
cancerrats vs. control rats, n = 6–8 in each group). This figure further shows
that PTX attenuated upregulation of TRPA1 induced by bone cancer
(P < 0.05 vs. cancerrats without PTX). Moreover,
intracellular signal pathways of DRG neurons, namely, p38-MAPK and JNK, were
examined. Bone cancer upregulated phosphorylated p38-MAPK and JNK, and these
amplifications were inhibited by administration of PTX. It is noted that total
protein levels of p38-MAPK and JNK were not increased significantly by bone
cancer. In addition, Figure
5(b) demonstrates that TRPA1 as well as phosphorylated p38-MAPK and
JNK were upregulated by bone cancer and SC144 attenuated upregulation of TRPA1
and phosphorylated p38-MAPK and JNK induced by cancer
(P < 0.05 vs. cancerrats without SC144, n = 8 = 10 in each
group).
Figure 5.
The effects of TNF-α and IL-6 inhibition on signal pathways leading to
neuropathic pain. PTX (40 mg/kg body weight, i.p. each day for three
consecutive days) was given to inhibit TNF-α. SC144 (20 mg/kg body
weight, i.p. each day for three consecutive days) was given to inhibit
IL-6 signal pathways. Three days after the beginning of respective
injection of PTX and SC144, DRG tissues were removed for examination of
TRPA1 and p38-MAPK and p-JNK signal pathways. (a)Averaged data and
typical bands, without treatment bone cancer increased TRPA1 as well as
intracellular signal p-p38-MAPK and p-JNK (phosphorylated form) in the
DRG as compared with control rats. Furthermore, administration of PTX
attenuated increases of TRPA1 and signal pathways in bone cancer rats.
Note that the total protein levels of p38-MAPK and JNK were not elevated
significantly by bone cancer. *P < 0.05 versus
control rats and bone cancer rats with PTX. n = 6–8 in each group. (b)
Averaged data and typical bands showing the effects of SC144. Bone
cancer increased the protein levels of TRPA1 and intracellular signal
p-p38-MAPK and p-JNK (phosphorylated form) in the DRG as compared with
control animals. SC144 attenuated amplification of TRPA1 and these
signal pathways in bone cancer rats. Total protein levels of p38-MAPK
and JNK were not elevated significantly by bone cancer.
*P < 0.05 versus control rats and bone cancer
rats with SC144. n = 8–10 in each group. PTX: pentoxifylline; TRPA1:
transient receptor potential ankyrin 1.
The effects of TNF-α and IL-6 inhibition on signal pathways leading to
neuropathic pain. PTX (40 mg/kg body weight, i.p. each day for three
consecutive days) was given to inhibit TNF-α. SC144 (20 mg/kg body
weight, i.p. each day for three consecutive days) was given to inhibit
IL-6 signal pathways. Three days after the beginning of respective
injection of PTX and SC144, DRG tissues were removed for examination of
TRPA1 and p38-MAPK and p-JNK signal pathways. (a)Averaged data and
typical bands, without treatment bone cancer increased TRPA1 as well as
intracellular signal p-p38-MAPK and p-JNK (phosphorylated form) in the
DRG as compared with control rats. Furthermore, administration of PTX
attenuated increases of TRPA1 and signal pathways in bone cancerrats.
Note that the total protein levels of p38-MAPK and JNK were not elevated
significantly by bone cancer. *P < 0.05 versus
control rats and bone cancerrats with PTX. n = 6–8 in each group. (b)
Averaged data and typical bands showing the effects of SC144. Bone
cancer increased the protein levels of TRPA1 and intracellular signal
p-p38-MAPK and p-JNK (phosphorylated form) in the DRG as compared with
control animals. SC144 attenuated amplification of TRPA1 and these
signal pathways in bone cancerrats. Total protein levels of p38-MAPK
and JNK were not elevated significantly by bone cancer.
*P < 0.05 versus control rats and bone cancerrats with SC144. n = 8–10 in each group. PTX: pentoxifylline; TRPA1:
transient receptor potential ankyrin 1.
Discussion
TNF-α and IL-6 are PICs playing a critical role in the development and maintenance of
inflammatory pain.[9] TNF-α and IL-6 induce pain through the release of inflammatory mediators
sensitizing ion channels.[9] Data of our current study provided the evidence that (1) systemic
administration of individual inhibitor of TNF-α, IL-6, and TRPA1 attenuated
mechanical hyperalgesia and thermal hypersensitivity induced by bone cancer and (2)
inhibition of TNF-α and IL-6 also attenuated expression of TRPA1, p38-MAPK, and JNK
signals in the DRG. Taken together, results suggest that TNF-α and IL-6 play a role
in modifying TRPA1 signal pathway by which it mediates mechanical hyperalgesia and
thermal hypersensitivity induced by bone cancer.It is noted that TNF-α plays an important role in regulating neuropathic pain in vivo
experiments using various animal models.[17,26-29] The mechanisms by which TNF-α
mediates mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia include a direct sensitization effect
of TNF-α and/or sensitization of inflammatory mediators evoked by TNF-α on ion
channels in sensory neurons.[14,15] TNF-α activates multiple signaling pathways, including the
p38-MAPK and JNK pathways,[9] which are recognized as important regulators of inflammatory pain. Also,
TNF-α treatment has been observed to result in an upregulation of TRPA1 expression
in sensory neurons.[16] In this prior study using the cultured cells, it was found that TNF-α
amplified TRPA1 via intracellular p38-MAPK signal.[16] On the basis of those results, in the current study, we designed our in vivo
experiments. Indeed, we observed that inhibition of TNF-α by PTX decreased
expression of TRPA1, p38-MAPK, and JNK in the DRG of cancerrats, and this further
attenuated neuropathic pain induced by bone cancer. Nonetheless, our results
demonstrated that p38-MAPK and JNK signal pathways are stimulated by bone cancer and
likely mediate upregulation of TRPA1 in sensory nerves. We demonstrated, for the
first time, a novel mechanism by which TNF-α contributes to enhanced TRPA1
expression likely via p38-MAPK and JNK signals, which are involved in mechanical
hyperalgesia and thermal hypersensitivity induced by bone cancer.Calcium is a key regulator of major cellular processes. Its cytosolic concentration
is determined mainly by extracellular calcium influx, release of calcium from
internal stores, and mitochondrial uptake. The levels of calcium and its channel
activity contribute to pathophysiological process of pain.[30] It has been reported that mitochondrial-mediated dysregulation of calcium
homeostasis or dysregulation of neurotrophins is involved in the mechanism of
neuropathic pain.[31,32] A prior study suggests that calcium influx is a part of process
for upregulation of TRPA1 expression by TNF-α.[33] Also, as TRPA1 receptor in sensory neurons is activated, calcium influx
occurs in the involvement of pain response.[30] In the current study, we observed that blocking TNF-α attenuated TRPA1
expression and decreased mechanical and thermal sensitivity. Thus, we speculated
that the effects of blocking TNF-α would improve dysregulation of calcium
homeostasis in attenuating neuropathic pain. In addition, increases in neurotrophins
(such as nerve growth factor) can amplify pain response and upregulation of TRPA1
expression, and increases of TRPA1 activity are partly involved in the effects of
neurotrophins.[34,35] Thus, there is a possibility that enhancement of TRPA1 observed
in this study is linked to dysregulation of neurotrophins in bone cancer-induced
neuropathy.IL-6 complexes with membrane-bound or soluble IL6R to activate cells expressing the
gp130.[36-38] Most cells are
devoid of membrane-bound IL-6R and are thus unresponsive to IL-6; however, they can
still react to IL-6 complexed with a soluble form of the IL-6R (sIL-6R) to activate
gp130, a pathway called “trans-signaling.”[39] A combination of all these receptors is the essential requirement of at least
one gp130 subunit for signal transduction. After activation, gp130 acts via
stimulation of the MAPK pathway and classical JAK-STAT signaling.[40] In addition to transcriptional regulation, IL-6 has been shown to control
protein synthesis of DRG neurons and thereby alter mechanical allodynia.[41] Evidence further suggests that knockdown of IL-6 transducing receptor
subunits gp130 decreases mRNA expression of TRPA1 in sensory neurons and IL-6 is
engaged in the expression and/or activation of TRPA1.[19,20]Thus, in the current study, we used SC144, a gp130 inhibitor, to block IL-6-mediated
signal transduction in order to examine engagement of the IL-6R in mechanical and
thermal hyperalgesia induced by bone cancer. Our data showed that systemic
administration of SC144 significantly amplified PWT and PWL in bone cancer animals.
Interestingly, SC144 attenuated expression of TRPA1 in the DRG of cancerrats,
suggesting the role played by IL-6 in modifying TRPA1 during the development of
neuropathic pain in cancerrats. Intracellular p38-MAPK and JNK signals are engaged
in the effects of IL-6. Accordingly, our data indicate that bone cancer activates
IL-6 signal, which subsequently amplifies expression of TRPA1 in the DRG via
intracellular p38-MAPK and JNK thereby resulting in mechanical hyperalgesia and
thermal hypersensitivity.
Conclusions
The protein expression levels of TRPA1 receptor in peripheral sensory neurons are
upregulated after bone cancer; and inhibition of TRPA1, TNF-α, and IL-6 signals
antagonizes mechanical hyperalgesia and thermal hypersensitivity inbone cancerrats. TRPA1 pathways play a role in TNF-α engagement of bone cancer-induced
neuropathic pain via intracellular p38-MAPK and JNK signal. Also, the role of
IL-6-TRPA1 signal in bone cancer-induced neuropathic pain is likely via p38-MAPK and
JNK pathways. Results of our study provide a base for the mechanisms responsible for
bone cancer-induced neuropathic pain. In particular, targeting one or more of these
signaling molecules involved in activation of TNF-α-TRPA1 and IL-6-TRPA1 evoked by
bone cancer may present new opportunities for treatment and management of
neuropathic pain in patients with bone cancer.
Authors: Elizabeth S Fernandes; Fiona A Russell; Domenico Spina; Jason J McDougall; Rabea Graepel; Clive Gentry; Amelia A Staniland; David M Mountford; Julie E Keeble; Marzia Malcangio; Stuart Bevan; Susan D Brain Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2011-03
Authors: Ikhlas El Karim; Maeliosa T C McCrudden; Gerard J Linden; Hanniah Abdullah; Timothy M Curtis; Mary McGahon; Imad About; Christopher Irwin; Fionnuala T Lundy Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Gina M Story; Andrea M Peier; Alison J Reeve; Samer R Eid; Johannes Mosbacher; Todd R Hricik; Taryn J Earley; Anne C Hergarden; David A Andersson; Sun Wook Hwang; Peter McIntyre; Tim Jegla; Stuart Bevan; Ardem Patapoutian Journal: Cell Date: 2003-03-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Elina Nummenmaa; Mari Hämäläinen; Lauri J Moilanen; Erja-Leena Paukkeri; Riina M Nieminen; Teemu Moilanen; Katriina Vuolteenaho; Eeva Moilanen Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.156