David T Liss1,2, Ronald T Ackermann3,4, Andrew Cooper3,4, Emily A Finch3,4, Courtney Hurt5, Nicola Lancki4, Angela Rogers4,6, Avani Sheth7, Caroline Teter4,6, Christine Schaeffer4,6. 1. Center for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. david.liss@northwestern.edu. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. david.liss@northwestern.edu. 3. Center for Community Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. PCPI Foundation, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Northwestern Medical Group Transitional Care, Chicago, IL, USA. 7. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited experimental evidence on transitional care interventions beyond 30 days post-discharge and in vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate effects of a transitional care practice (TC) that comprehensively addresses patients' medical and psychosocial needs following hospital discharge. DESIGN: Pragmatic, randomized comparative effectiveness trial. PATIENTS: Adults discharged from an initial emergency, observation, or inpatient hospital encounter with no trusted usual source of care. INTERVENTIONS:TC intervention included a scheduled post-discharge appointment at the TC practice, where a multidisciplinary team comprehensively assessed patients' medical and psychosocial needs, addressed modifiable barriers, and subsequent linkage to a new primary care source. Routine Care involved assistance scheduling a post-discharge appointment with a primary care provider that often partnered with the hospital where the initial encounter occurred. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was a binary indicator of death or additional hospital encounters within 90 days of initial discharge. Secondary outcomes included any additional hospital encounters, and counts of hospital encounters, over 180 days. KEY RESULTS:Four hundred ninety patients were randomized to TC intervention and 164 to Routine Care; 34.6% were uninsured, 49.7% had Medicaid, and 57.4% were homeless or lived in a high-poverty area. There was no significant difference between arms in the 90-day probability of death or additional hospital encounters (relative risk [RR] 0.89; 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.13). However, TC patients had 37% and 35% lower probability of any inpatient admission over 90 days (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.91) and 180 days (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.89), respectively. Over 180 days, TC patients had 42% fewer inpatient admissions (incidence rate ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients randomized to a patient-centered transitional care intervention, there was no significant reduction in 90-day probability of death or additional hospital encounters. However, there were significant decreases in measures of inpatient admissions over 180 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03066492.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is limited experimental evidence on transitional care interventions beyond 30 days post-discharge and in vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate effects of a transitional care practice (TC) that comprehensively addresses patients' medical and psychosocial needs following hospital discharge. DESIGN: Pragmatic, randomized comparative effectiveness trial. PATIENTS: Adults discharged from an initial emergency, observation, or inpatient hospital encounter with no trusted usual source of care. INTERVENTIONS:TC intervention included a scheduled post-discharge appointment at the TC practice, where a multidisciplinary team comprehensively assessed patients' medical and psychosocial needs, addressed modifiable barriers, and subsequent linkage to a new primary care source. Routine Care involved assistance scheduling a post-discharge appointment with a primary care provider that often partnered with the hospital where the initial encounter occurred. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was a binary indicator of death or additional hospital encounters within 90 days of initial discharge. Secondary outcomes included any additional hospital encounters, and counts of hospital encounters, over 180 days. KEY RESULTS: Four hundred ninety patients were randomized to TC intervention and 164 to Routine Care; 34.6% were uninsured, 49.7% had Medicaid, and 57.4% were homeless or lived in a high-poverty area. There was no significant difference between arms in the 90-day probability of death or additional hospital encounters (relative risk [RR] 0.89; 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.13). However, TCpatients had 37% and 35% lower probability of any inpatient admission over 90 days (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.91) and 180 days (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.89), respectively. Over 180 days, TCpatients had 42% fewer inpatient admissions (incidence rate ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients randomized to a patient-centered transitional care intervention, there was no significant reduction in 90-day probability of death or additional hospital encounters. However, there were significant decreases in measures of inpatient admissions over 180 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03066492.
Authors: Kevin E Thorpe; Merrick Zwarenstein; Andrew D Oxman; Shaun Treweek; Curt D Furberg; Douglas G Altman; Sean Tunis; Eduardo Bergel; Ian Harvey; David J Magid; Kalipso Chalkidou Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Robb D Kociol; Li Liang; Adrian F Hernandez; Lesley H Curtis; Paul A Heidenreich; Clyde W Yancy; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric D Peterson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Richard B Balaban; Alison A Galbraith; Marguerite E Burns; Catherine E Vialle-Valentin; Marc R Larochelle; Dennis Ross-Degnan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian W Jack; Veerappa K Chetty; David Anthony; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Gail M Sanchez; Anna E Johnson; Shaula R Forsythe; Julie K O'Donnell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Christopher Manasseh; Stephen Martin; Larry Culpepper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Paul Y Takahashi; Anupam Chandra; Rozalina G McCoy; Lynn S Borkenhagen; Mary E Larson; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Joel A Hickman; Kristi M Swanson; Gregory J Hanson; James M Naessens Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Mary Malebranche; Apostolos Sarivalasis; Solange Peters; Patrice Mathevet; Jacques Cornuz; Patrick Bodenmann Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2020 Jan-Dec
Authors: Joshua Garfein; George Cholack; Rachel Krallman; Delaney Feldeisen; Daniel Montgomery; Eva Kline-Rogers; Kim Eagle; Melvyn Rubenfire; Sherry Bumpus Journal: Am J Med Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.965