Miloš Keřkovský1, Jakub Stulík2, Marek Dostál2,3, Matyáš Kuhn4,5, Jan Lošák4, Petra Praksová6, Monika Hulová6, Josef Bednařík6, Andrea Šprláková-Puková2, Marek Mechl2. 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Kerkovsky.Milos@fnbrno.cz. 2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Biophysics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. 4. Department of Psychiatry, The University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. 5. Behavioural and Social Neuroscience, CEITEC MU, Brno, Czech Republic. 6. Department of Neurology, The University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are quite commonly found incidentally, their aetiology, structural characteristics, and functional consequences are not entirely known. The purpose of this study was to quantify WMHs in a sample of young, neurologically asymptomatic adults and evaluate the structural and functional correlations of lesion load with changes in brain volume, diffusivity, and functional connectivity. METHODS: MRI brain scan using multimodal protocol was performed in 60 neurologically asymptomatic volunteers (21 men, 39 women, mean age 34.5 years). WMHs were manually segmented in 3D FLAIR images and counted automatically. The number and volume of WMHs were correlated with brain volume, resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Diffusion parameters measured within WMHs and normally appearing white matter (NAWM) were compared. RESULTS: At least 1 lesion was found in 40 (67%) subjects, median incidence was 1 lesion (interquartile range [IQR] = 4.5), and median volume was 86.82 (IQR = 227.23) mm3. Neither number nor volume of WMHs correlated significantly with total brain volume or volumes of white and grey matter. Mean diffusivity values within WMHs were significantly higher compared with those for NAWM, but none of the diffusion parameters of NAWM were significantly correlated with WMH load. Both the number and volume of WMHs were correlated with the changes of functional connectivity between several regions of the brain, mostly decreased connectivity of the cerebellum. CONCLUSIONS: WMHs are commonly found even in young, neurologically asymptomatic adults. Their presence is not associated with brain atrophy or global changes of diffusivity, but the increasing number and volume of these lesions correlate with changes of brain connectivity, and especially that of the cerebellum. KEY POINTS: • White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are commonly found in young, neurologically asymptomatic adults. • The presence of WMHs is not associated with brain atrophy or global changes of white matter diffusivity. • The increasing number and volume of WMHs correlate with changes of brain connectivity, and especially with that of the cerebellum.
OBJECTIVES: Although white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are quite commonly found incidentally, their aetiology, structural characteristics, and functional consequences are not entirely known. The purpose of this study was to quantify WMHs in a sample of young, neurologically asymptomatic adults and evaluate the structural and functional correlations of lesion load with changes in brain volume, diffusivity, and functional connectivity. METHODS: MRI brain scan using multimodal protocol was performed in 60 neurologically asymptomatic volunteers (21 men, 39 women, mean age 34.5 years). WMHs were manually segmented in 3D FLAIR images and counted automatically. The number and volume of WMHs were correlated with brain volume, resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Diffusion parameters measured within WMHs and normally appearing white matter (NAWM) were compared. RESULTS: At least 1 lesion was found in 40 (67%) subjects, median incidence was 1 lesion (interquartile range [IQR] = 4.5), and median volume was 86.82 (IQR = 227.23) mm3. Neither number nor volume of WMHs correlated significantly with total brain volume or volumes of white and grey matter. Mean diffusivity values within WMHs were significantly higher compared with those for NAWM, but none of the diffusion parameters of NAWM were significantly correlated with WMH load. Both the number and volume of WMHs were correlated with the changes of functional connectivity between several regions of the brain, mostly decreased connectivity of the cerebellum. CONCLUSIONS: WMHs are commonly found even in young, neurologically asymptomatic adults. Their presence is not associated with brain atrophy or global changes of diffusivity, but the increasing number and volume of these lesions correlate with changes of brain connectivity, and especially that of the cerebellum. KEY POINTS: • White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are commonly found in young, neurologically asymptomatic adults. • The presence of WMHs is not associated with brain atrophy or global changes of white matter diffusivity. • The increasing number and volume of WMHs correlate with changes of brain connectivity, and especially with that of the cerebellum.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diffusion tensor imaging; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Healthy volunteers; White matter
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: D T Okuda; E M Mowry; A Beheshtian; E Waubant; S E Baranzini; D S Goodin; S L Hauser; D Pelletier Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Carolin Gramsch; Felix Nensa; Oliver Kastrup; Stefan Maderwald; Cornelius Deuschl; Adrian Ringelstein; Juliane Schelhorn; Michael Forsting; Marc Schlamann Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: F Fazekas; R Kleinert; H Offenbacher; R Schmidt; G Kleinert; F Payer; H Radner; H Lechner Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Susana Muñoz Maniega; Maria C Valdés Hernández; Jonathan D Clayden; Natalie A Royle; Catherine Murray; Zoe Morris; Benjamin S Aribisala; Alan J Gow; John M Starr; Mark E Bastin; Ian J Deary; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Lin Shi; Xinyuan Miao; Wutao Lou; Kai Liu; Jill Abrigo; Adrian Wong; Winnie C W Chu; Defeng Wang; Vincent C T Mok Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 4.003