| Literature DB >> 31143705 |
Zhuo-Xian Rong1,2, Zhi Li1,2,3, Jun-Ju He1,2, Li-Yu Liu1,2, Xin-Xin Ren1,2, Jie Gao1,2, Yun Mu1,2, Yi-Di Guan1,2, Yu-Mei Duan4, Xiu-Ping Zhang5, De-Xiang Zhang6, Nan Li5, Yue-Zhen Deng1,2,3, Lun-Quan Sun1,2,3.
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) ranks as the second most malignant type of primary liver cancer with a high degree of incidence and a very poor prognosis. Fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) functions as an eraser of the RNA m6A modification, but its roles in ICC tumorigenesis and development remain unknown. We showed here that the protein level of FTO was downregulated in clinical ICC samples and cell lines and that FTO expression was inversely correlated with the expression of CA19-9 and micro-vessel density (MVD). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that a low expression of FTO predicted poor prognosis in ICC. in vitro, decreased endogenous expression of FTO obviously reduced apoptosis of ICC cells. Moreover, FTO suppressed the anchorage-independent growth and mobility of ICC cells. Through mining the database, FTO was found to regulate the integrin signaling pathway, inflammation signaling pathway, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway, angiogenesis, and the pyrimidine metabolism pathway. RNA decay assay showed that oncogene TEAD2 mRNA stability was impaired by FTO. In addition, the overexpression of FTO suppressed tumor growth in vivo. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the critical roles of FTO in ICC.Entities:
Keywords: FTO; ICC; RNA m6A modification; TEAD2; metastasis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31143705 PMCID: PMC6521779 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Relationship between FTO expression in ICC and clinicopathologic features.
| Age | ||||
| ≤ 60 | 57 | 20 | 37 | 0.713 |
| >60 | 80 | 55 | 25 | |
| WBC(× 109/L) | ||||
| ≤ 6.4 | 77 | 38 | 39 | 0.023 |
| >6.4 | 60 | 42 | 18 | |
| HGB(g/L) | ||||
| ≤ 160 | 35 | 12 | 23 | < 0.001 |
| >160 | 102 | 68 | 34 | |
| RBC(× 1012/L) | ||||
| ≤ 4.48 | 49 | 33 | 16 | < 0.001 |
| >4.48 | 88 | 47 | 41 | |
| AFU(μg/L) | ||||
| ≤ 17 | 50 | 33 | 17 | 0.01 |
| >17 | 87 | 47 | 40 | |
| CA19-9 | ||||
| ≤ 40 | 70 | 48 | 22 | 0.016 |
| >40 | 67 | 32 | 35 | |
| ALP(U/L) | ||||
| ≤ 135 | 86 | 54 | 32 | 0.08 |
| >135 | 51 | 26 | 25 | |
| CD34 | ||||
| Positive | 52 | 37 | 15 | 0.014 |
| Negtive | 85 | 43 | 42 | |
Figure 1FTO was downregulated in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (A) Representative IHC staining of FTO in human ICC specimens. Black arrow indicates intrahepatic bile duct epithelial cells and red arrow indicates ICC cells. (B) Statistical analysis of FTO expression in ICC cases (n = 137) and human paracancerous intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells (para-HIBECS, n = 136). (C) Analysis of FTO expression between ICC cases and paired para-HIBECS (n = 133). (D) Comparison of FTO expression in the cases of recurrence (n = 77) with that of specimens from patients without recurrence (n = 6 1). (E) Differential expression of FTO between poorly-differentiated cases (n = 50) and highly differentiated cases (n = 85).
Figure 2Low expression of FTO predicted a poor prognosis in ICC. (A–D) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Red line, FTO high expression; Green line, FTO low expression. (A) Overall survival analysis (n = 137), (B) Relapse-free survival analysis (n = 137), (C) Overall survival analysis in patients with tumor necrosis (n = 88) and (D) in tumor necrosis-free patients (n = 48).
Figure 3FTO mRNA level was low in ICC cells. (A) The genetic alterations of erasers, readers, and writers for the m6A modification in ICC were analyzed by cBioPortal. (B) The expression levels of erasers, readers and writers for m6A modification in ICC cell lines (n = 4) and the intrahepatic biliary epithelial cell line HIBEPIC were analyzed by q-PCR. (C) The mRNA levels of FTO in control, overexpression, and knockdown TFK1 cells were assessed by q-PCR. (D,E) The protein levels of FTO in control, overexpression and knockdown TFK1 and HCCC-9810 cells.
Figure 4FTO promoted cisplatin-induced apoptosis of ICC cells. (A,B) Clonogenic survival assay of shFTO TFK1 cells and corresponding control cells treated with 0, 10, and 20 μM cisplatin. Data are presented as mean ± SD from n = 4. (C) The effects of FTO knockdown on the apoptosis of TFK1 cells treated with cisplatin (CIS, 30 ng/ml, 24 h) were examined using flow cytometric analysis. (D) The statistical analysis for (C). Data are presented as mean ± SD from n = 3. (E) The effects of FTO over-expression on the apoptosis of TFK1 cells treated with cisplatin (CIS, 30 ng/ml, 24 h) were examined using flow cytometric analysis. (F) The statistical analysis for (E), data are presented as mean ± SD from n = 3.
Figure 5FTO inhibited the colony formation and migration of ICC cells in vitro. (A) The anchorage-independent viability of TFK1 cells was tested in a soft agar colony formation assay. (B) Statistical analysis of colony size. (C) Statistical analysis of colony numbers. (D,E) Transwell assays were performed to examine the effects of FTO overexpression on the invasiveness of FTK1 cells (scale: 100 μm). (F–I) Transwell assays were performed to examine the effects of FTO knockdown on the invasiveness of HCCC-9810 and TFK1 cells (scale: 100 μm).
Figure 6The overexpression of FTO suppressed tumor growth. (A) The growth curve of the tumor (n = 4). (B) FTO overexpression significantly suppressed tumor growth (n = 4). (C) Tumors weight (n = 4). (D,E) The FTO expression in tumors was determined by western blot (D) and immunohistochemistry (E).
Figure 7FTO thwarted ICC progression through regulation of multiple oncogenes and suppressors. (A) Mining the differentially expressed genes in GSE33870, GSE32225 and GSE45001 using GEO2R. (B) 3D scatter of 35 common differentially expressed genes in the three data sets. (C) GO pathway analysis of 35 common differentially expressed genes in the three data sets. (D) The mRNA expression of candidate genes was detected by RT-PCR in shFTO TFK1 cells and corresponding control cells. (E,F) The mRNA stability of candidate genes was examined in FTO-overexpressing TFK1 cells, shFTO TFK1 cells, and corresponding control cells by RNA decay assay.
Genes related with ICC development based on FTO regulation.
| COL8A1 | 6.589 | 2.515 | 7.516 | Collagen alpha-1(VIII) chain |
| TEAD2 | 3.16 | 2.16 | 3.605 | Transcriptional enhancer factor TEF-4 |
| CMTM4 | 2.028 | 2.368 | 3.053 | CKLF-like MARVEL transmembrane domain-containing 4 |
| C7 | 0.49 | 0.397 | 0.038 | Complement component C7 |
| HAO2 | 0.444 | 0.374 | 0.005 | Hydroxyacid oxidase 2 |
| NR5A2 | 0.412 | 0.46 | 0.285 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A member 2 |
| CCL19 | 0.374 | 0.401 | 0.029 | C-C motif chemokine 19 |
| TCF21 | 0.339 | 0.419 | 0.349 | Transcription factor 21 |
| APOA2 | 0.274 | 0.293 | 0.002 | Apolipoprotein A-II |
| NTRK2 | 0.203 | 0.454 | 0.158 | BDNF/NT-3 growth factors receptor |
| DPT | 0.162 | 0.465 | 0.027 | Dermatopontin |
| FGA | 0.136 | 0.461 | 0.031 | Fibrinogen alpha chain |
| SCML4 | 0.066 | 0.328 | 0.358 | Sex comb on midleg-like protein 4 |