| Literature DB >> 31143535 |
Piotr Androsiuk1, Justyna Koc1, Katarzyna Joanna Chwedorzewska2, Ryszard Górecki1, Irena Giełwanowska1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poa annua L. is an example of a plant characterized by abundant, worldwide distribution from polar to equatorial regions. Due to its high plasticity and extraordinary expansiveness, P. annua is considered an invasive species capable of occupying and surviving in a wide range of habitats including pioneer zones, areas intensively transformed by human activities, remote subarctic meadows and even the Antarctic Peninsula region.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; Annual bluegrass; Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; iPBS
Year: 2019 PMID: 31143535 PMCID: PMC6525586 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
The origin of Poa annua populations used in the study and their population genetic characteristics.
| Population | Sampling site | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS | King George Island, maritime Antarctica | 140 | 14.97 | 0.091 | 0.063 |
| SI | Mukhrino, Western Siberia | 137 | 6.12 | 0.032 | 0.022 |
| PO | Olsztyn, Poland | 139 | 19.73 | 0.118 | 0.081 |
| MA | Ohrid, Macedonia | 142 | 15.65 | 0.088 | 0.060 |
| AL | Saranda, Albania | 144 | 19.05 | 0.108 | 0.073 |
| KO | Apatity, Kola Peninsula | 132 | 12.93 | 0.081 | 0.057 |
| Mean over loci and populations | 139.0 | 14.74 | 0.086 | 0.059 |
Figure 1The geographic location of the studied sampling sites of Poa annua on a contour map of (A) Eurasia and (B) Antarctic.
iPBS primers applied in the study and their specification.
| Primer | Sequence | Number of amplified bands | Number of polymorphic bands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2085 | 5′-ATGCCGATACCA-3′ | 50 | 15 | 5 |
| 2224 | 5′-ATCCTGGCAATGGAACCA-3′ | 52 | 19 | 7 |
| 2229 | 5′-CGACCTGTTCTGATACCA-3′ | 56 | 25 | 11 |
| 2231 | 5′-ACTTGGATGCTGATACCA-3′ | 52 | 14 | 5 |
| 2238 | 5′-ACCTAGCTCATGATGCCA-3′ | 56 | 17 | 9 |
| 2249 | 5′-AACCGACCTCTGATACCA-3′ | 58 | 23 | 13 |
| 2253 | 5′-TCGAGGCTCTAGATACCA-3′ | 50 | 17 | 5 |
| 2378 | 5′-GGTCCTCATCCA-3′ | 53 | 17 | 9 |
| Total | 147 | 64 | ||
Figure 2The uppermost hierarchical level of genetic structure of studied Poa annua populations using STRUCTURE (Pritchard, Stephens & Donnelly, 2000).
(A) The values of the second-order rate of change of L(K), ΔK, of data between successive K values. (B) The population structure bar plots generated at K = 2.
Figure 3Plot of Coordinate 1 vs Coordinate 2 obtained by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Euclidean distances between all individuals from six Poa annua populations.
AS King George Island (filled circle), SI Mukhrino (inverted open triangle), PO Olsztyn (open square), MA Ohrid (open diamond), AL Saranda (times), KO Apatity (open triangle).
Partitioning of diversity found in Poa annua populations using AMOVA (F = 0.582).
| Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 5 | 583.376 | 4.788 | 58.25 |
| Within populations | 137 | 470.204 | 3.432 | 41.75 |
| Total | 142 | 1,053.580 | 8.220 |
Note:
Significance tests (1,023 permutations); p < 0.001.
Tajima’s D test and Fu’s F neutrality tests for the analyzed populations.
| Test | Description | Population | Statistics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS | SI | PO | MA | AL | KO | Mean | SD | ||
| Tajima’s | S | 22 | 9 | 29 | 23 | 28 | 19 | 21.667 | 7.257 |
| Pi | 8.433 | 2.525 | 7.953 | 7.609 | 8.795 | 6.697 | 7.002 | 2.310 | |
| Tajima’s | 1.317 | 0.157 | 0.091 | 0.869 | 0.386 | 1.465 | 0.714 | 0.593 | |
| Tajima’s | 0.918 | 0.625 | 0.615 | 0.845 | 0.704 | 0.948 | 0.776 | 0.147 | |
| Fu’s | Theta_pi | 8.433 | 2.525 | 7.953 | 7.609 | 8.795 | 6.697 | 7.002 | 2.310 |
| Exp. no. of alleles | 10.303 | 6.424 | 11.446 | 11.226 | 10.471 | 12.346 | 10.369 | 2.068 | |
| −7.406 | −6.573 | −16.159 | −16.676 | −12.401 | −24.621 | −13.973 | 6.721 | ||
| 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Mismatch analysis.
| Model | Statistic | Populations | Mean | SD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS | SI | PO | MA | AL | KO | ||||
| Demographic expansion | SSD | 0.021 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Model (SSD) | 0.290 | 0.730 | 0.590 | 0.860 | 0.460 | 0.670 | 0.600 | 0.203 | |
| Raggedness index | 0.018 | 0.042 | 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.012 | |
| Raggedness | 0.790 | 0.620 | 0.590 | 0.880 | 0.660 | 0.600 | 0.690 | 0.118 | |
| Spatial expansion | SSD | 0.032 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Model (SSD) | 0.050 | 0.800 | 0.530 | 0.710 | 0.360 | 0.660 | 0.518 | 0.276 | |
| Raggedness index | 0.018 | 0.042 | 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.012 | |
| Raggedness | 0.710 | 0.500 | 0.410 | 0.830 | 0.500 | 0.610 | 0.593 | 0.155 | |
Testing the bottleneck vs mutation drift equilibrium hypotheses for all analyzed populations (IAM mutation model).
| Population | Sign test | Standardized test | Wilcoxon test |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | One tail for heterozygosity deficiency: 0.99999 | ||
| One tail for heterozygosity excess: 0.00001 | |||
| Two tails for heterozygosity excess and deficiency: 0.00003 | |||
| SI | One tail for heterozygosity deficiency: 0.90234 | ||
| One tail for heterozygosity excess: 0.12500 | |||
| Two tails for heterozygosity excess and deficiency: 0.25000 | |||
| PO | One tail for heterozygosity deficiency: 1.00000 | ||
| One tail for heterozygosity excess: 0.00000 | |||
| Two tails for heterozygosity excess and deficiency: 0.00000 | |||
| MA | One tail for heterozygosity deficiency: 0.99996 | ||
| One tail for heterozygosity excess: 0.00004 | |||
| Two tails for heterozygosity excess and deficiency: 0.00009 | |||
| AL | One tail for heterozygosity deficiency: 1.00000 | ||
| One tail for heterozygosity excess: 0.00000 | |||
| Two tails for heterozygosity excess and deficiency: 0.00000 | |||
| KO | One tail for heterozygosity deficiency: 1.00000 | ||
| One tail for heterozygosity excess: 0.00000 | |||
| Two tails for heterozygosity excess and deficiency: 0.00000 |
Note:
HEEx, expected heterozygosity excess; HDe, heterozygosity deficiency; HEx, heterozygosity excess.