| Literature DB >> 31143034 |
Khaled A Alhawri1, Colin J Mcmahon1, Mohammed M Alrih1, Yamin Alzein1, Asad A Khan1, Suhaib K Mohammed1, Khaled S Alalwi1, Kevin P Walsh1, Damien P Kenny1, Jonathon G McGuinness1, Lars Nolke1, John M Redmond1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) in association with tetralogy of Fallot is a rare and complex disease that makes its repair more difficult than repair of either lesion alone. We reviewed retrospectively our experience in managing this lesion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and May 2017, 16 patients who underwent repair of CAVSD/tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) were reviewed retrospectively. Fifteen patients had trisomy 21. Five patients underwent primary repair while eleven patients went for staged repair in the form of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) stenting (n = 9) or systemic to pulmonary (S-P) surgical shunt (n = 2). RVOT stenting has replaced surgical shunt since 2012 in our center. Early presentation with cyanosis was the main determinant factor for staged versus primary repair.Entities:
Keywords: Atrioventricular valve regurgitation; Blalock–Taussig; complete atrioventricular septal defect; left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; right ventricular outflow tract
Year: 2019 PMID: 31143034 PMCID: PMC6521653 DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_87_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Pediatr Cardiol ISSN: 0974-5149
Figure 1Flow chart demonstrating the number of patients who underwent palliation and primary repair and type of palliation
Comparison between children with and without palliation at final repair
| Patients | Two-stage repair palliation | Primary repair | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | ||||
| Age (months) | 6 | 6.5 | 5 | 0.344 |
| Weight (kg) | 6.9 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 0.188 |
| Trisomy 21 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0.519 |
| Operative | ||||
| Valve sparing | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0.002 |
| Bypass | 197.64 | 205.81 | 167.66 | 0.436 |
| X clamp | 137.07 | 150.45 | 116 | 0.299 |
| ECMO | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.519 |
| Length of stay | ||||
| ICU stay (days) | 16.5 | 19.5 | 3.5 | 0.306 |
| Hospital stay (days) | 36 | 44 | 16 | 0.250 |
| Complications | ||||
| Reoperation | ||||
| Early (PPM, PVR + MVR) | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.221 |
| Late (RVOT stent) | 1 | 1 | 0.519 | |
| Chylothorax (%) | 8 (50) | 6 (75) | 2 (25) | 0.619 |
| Tachyarrhythmia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.519 |
| Bradyarrhythmia | 2 | 0.341 | ||
| Sepsis | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0.639 |
| Stroke | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.413 |
| LAVVR (moderate to severe) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.341 |
| Ventricular dysfunction | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.519 |
| Mortality | 1 (late) | 1 | 0 | 0.519 |
ECMO: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator, ICU: Intensive care unit, PPM: Permanent pacemaker, PVR: Pulmonary valve replacement, MVR: Mitral valve replacement, RVOT: Right ventricular outflow tract, LAVVR: Left atrioventricular valve regurgitation
Summary of patient’s data
| Number | Presenting symptoms | Initial palliation | Age (days) | Trisomy 21 | Total repair tech | Age (months) | Complications | Postoperative echo on last follow-up (ventricular function, left, right AVVR, RVOT obstruction, and pulmonary regurgitation) | Results | Follow-up months | Reintervention postinitial palliation | Reoperation after total repair |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 15 | Yes | TA, 2 patch, DSC | 6 | CHB needed PPM | Good ventricular function, mild left and right AVVR | Alive, well | 5 | RVOT restent | |
| 2 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 62 | Yes | PVp, 2 patch | 6 | JET | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 33 mmHg Moderate PR | Alive, well | 8 | Balloon dilation | |
| 3 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 46 | No | TA, 2 patch, monocusp contegra, DSC | 8 | Needed ECMO 12 h in ICU, then had myectomy for LVOTO, pulmonary melody valve, then melody valve in LAVV due to severe left AVVR, chylothorax long ICU stay | Good biventricular function Mild+RAVVR - Mild melody valve stenosis and regurgitation Melody in RVOT PG 15 mmHg Mild-moderate PR | Alive, mild mitral melody valve stenosis and regurgitation, pulmonary melody moderate regurgitation | 11 | Balloon dilation | PVR, MVR |
| 4 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 46 | Yes | TA, 2 patch, monocusp contega | 7 | Chylothorax, long ICU stay (sepsis) | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 25 mmHg Free PR | Alive, well | 12 | Balloon dilation | |
| 5 | Yes | TA, 2 patch | 13 | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVRv - mild LAVVR RVOT PG 25 mmHg Free PR | Alive, well | 6 | ||||||
| 6 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 29 | Yes | TA, 2 patch, divided superior bridging leaflet | 11 | Chylothorax | Good biventricular function No RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 22 mmHg Free PR | Alive, well | 22 | ||
| 7 | Yes | TA, 2 patch, monocusp pericardial | 4 | Good biventricular function No RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 45 mmHg Moderate PR | Alive, well | 19 | ||||||
| 8 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 46 | Yes | PVp, 2 patch | 8 | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 19 mmHg Free PR | Alive and well | 10 | |||
| 9 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 41 | Yes | TA, 2 patch, monocusp contgra, divided superior bridging leaflet | 6 | Chylothorax | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 24 mmHg moderate PR | Alive, needed RVOT stent 1 year later | 32 | RVOT stent | |
| 10 | Cyanosis | RVOT stent | 62 | Yes | TA, 2 patch, monocusp perocardial | 5 | Chylothorax | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 16 mmHg Free PR | Alive, well | 30 | ||
| 11 | Yes | TA, 2 patch | 5 | Chylothorax, long ICU staym, CHB needed PPM (sepsis) | Good biventricular function Trivial RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 25 mmHg Mild PR | Alive, well | 39 | |||||
| 12 | Yes | PVp, 2 patch | 5 | Good biventricular function Trivial RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 25 mmHg Mild PR | Alive, well | 79 | ||||||
| 13 | Cyanosis | BT shunt | 98 | Yes | PVp, 2 patch | 4 | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 14 mmHg Free PR | Alive, well | 88 | |||
| 14 | Cyanosis | BT shunt | 18 | Yes | TA, 2 patch | 16 | Chylothorax | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Moderate LAVVR RVOT PG 15 mmHg Free PR | Alive, well | 11 | ||
| 15 | Yes | TA, 2 patch | 18 | Good biventricular function Mild RAVVR - Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 15 mmHg Free PR | Died 3 years later due to sepsis | 24 | ||||||
| 16 | Yes | PVp, 2 patch | 3 | Chylothorax | Good biventricular function Trivial RAVVR – Mild LAVVR RVOT PG 25 mmHg Mild PR | Alive, well | 130 |
CHB: Complete heart block, BT: Blalock–Taussig, DSC: Delayed sternal closure, ICU: Intensive care unit, JET: Junctional ectopic tachycardia, LAVV: Left atrioventricular valve, LVOTO: Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, MVR: Mitral valve replacement, PPM: Permanent pacemaker, PVp: Pulmonary valve preservation, PVR: Pulmonary valve replacement, RVOT: Right ventricular outflow tract, TA: Transannular patch, ECMO: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator, AVVR: Atrioventricular valve regurgitation, LAVVR: Left AVVR, RAVVR: Right AVVR, CHF : Congestive heart failure, MBT : Modified blalock taussig shunt, PG: Pressure gradient, PR: Pulmonary regurgitation
Figure 2One of our patients with right ventricular outflow tract stenting