| Literature DB >> 31142804 |
Tai-Sing Wu1, Leng-You Syu1, Chao-Nan Lin2, Bi-Hsuan Lin3, Yi-Hsiu Liao4, Shih-Chang Weng3, Yuh-Jeen Huang2, Horng-Tay Jeng1,5, Shih-Yuan Lu4, Shih-Lin Chang1,3, Yun-Liang Soo6,7.
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation on CeO2 nanocrystals catalysts has been observed to largely increase the material's catalytic activity and reactive surface area. As revealed by x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) analysis, the concentration of subvalent Ce3+ ions in the irradiated ceria samples progressively increases with the UV-light exposure time. The increase of Ce3+ concentration as a result of UV irradiation was also confirmed by the UV-vis diffuse reflectance and photoluminescence spectra that indicate substantially increased concentration of oxygen vacancy defects in irradiated samples. First-principle formation-energy calculation for oxygen vacancy defects revealed a valence-hole-dominated mechanism for the irradiation-induced reduction of CeO2 consistent with the experimental results. Based on a Mars-van Krevelen mechanism for ceria catalyzed oxidation processes, as the Ce3+ concentration is increased by UV-light irradiation, an increased number of reactive oxygen atoms will be captured from gas-phase O2 by the surface Ce3+ ions, and therefore leads to the observed catalytic activity enhancement. The unique annealing-free defect engineering method using UV-light irradiation provides an ultraconvenient approach for activity improvement in nanocrystal ceria for a wide variety of catalytic applications.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31142804 PMCID: PMC6541612 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44543-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1XRD patterns and a TEM micrograph of the as-made CeO2 sample.
Figure 2Comparison of the catalytic activity of the as-made CeO2 sample with those of samples irradiated by UV light for various irradiation time.
Figure 3(a) Ce L3-edge XANES data of the as-made CeO2 sample irradiated by UV-light for different time durations. (b) Ce L3-edge XANES data of the 180-min-irradiated CeO2 sample after being stored in ambient condition with UV-light off for different time durations. (c) A plot of Ce3+ concentration vs. UV-light irradiation time of the as-made CeO2 sample. (d) A plot of Ce3+ concentration vs. UV-light-off time of the 180-min-irradiated CeO2 sample.
Figure 4A plot of Ce3+ concentration vs. UV-light irradiation time of the as-made CeO2 sample irradiated in a pure O2 atmosphere.
Figure 5(a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of ceria nanoparticles and (b) the Tauc plot (αhν)1/2 vs (hν) for CeO2 sample before and after 3 hours of UV-light irradiation.
Figure 6Room temperature photoluminescence (PL) spectra of as-made and UV-light irradiated CeO2 nanocrystal sample at an excitation wavelength of 325 nm.
Figure 7(a) Supercell of CeO2 (100) slab used in the calculation. (b) Schematic view of CeO2 (100) slab with one oxygen vacancy defect. The large white balls and small red balls represent the Ce and O atoms, respectively.