Teppei Nakamura1,2, Miyuki Norimura3, Kanako Sumi3, Osamu Ichii2, Yaser Hosny Ali Elewa2,4, Yasuhiro Kon2, Osamu Tatsumi1, Hideki Hattori3, Tomoji Yoshiyasu3, Ken-Ichi Nagasaki5. 1. Section of Biological Science, Chitose Laboratory, Japan Food Research Laboratories, 2-3 Bunkyo, Chitose, Hokkaido 066-0052, Japan. 2. Laboratory of Anatomy, Department of Basic Veterinary Sciences, Division of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 18-Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0818, Japan. 3. Section of Biological Safety Research, Chitose Laboratory, Japan Food Research Laboratories, 2-3 Bunkyo, Chitose, Hokkaido 066-0052, Japan. 4. Department of Histology and Cytology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Qesm Awal Az Zagazig, Ash Sharqia Governorate 44519, Egypt. 5. Section of Biological Safety Research, Tama Laboratory, Japan Food Research Laboratories, 6-11-10 Nagayama, Tama, Tokyo 206-0025, Japan.
Abstract
The formation of the caudal vena cava is a complex process involving development, regression, and anastomosis. In mammals, the normal caudal vena cava runs to the right side of the abdominal aorta, while duplication of the caudal vena cava has been identified as a congenital abnormality in both companion animals and humans. The present study demonstrates that Slc:Hartley guinea pigs frequently possess asymptomatic duplicated caudal vena cava. The prevalence was 30% and 24% for males and females, respectively, with no sex-related differences. In accordance with Saad et al. (2012)'s criteria, duplicated caudal vena cava were classified into two distinct variations. The dominant variation was a complete duplication without iliac anastomosis where the left caudal vena cava continued from the left common iliac vein and joined the left renal vein; the left renal vein ran to the right to join the right caudal vena cava. The alternative variation was an incomplete duplication where the left caudal vena cava joined the right infrarenal caudal vena cava at a more cranial point than in normal cases; the renal segment was unchanged. Iliac anastomosis was not found in any cases. Duplicated caudal vena cava neither affected the body weight nor the kidney weight. In conclusion, Slc:Hartley guinea pigs frequently possess asymptomatic duplicated caudal vena cava in the absence of iliac anastomosis and appear to be a novel and useful animal model for duplicated caudal vena cava in animals and humans.
The formation of the caudal vena cava is a complex process involving development, regression, and anastomosis. In mammals, the normal caudal vena cava runs to the right side of the abdominal aorta, while duplication of the caudal vena cava has been identified as a congenital abnormality in both companion animals and humans. The present study demonstrates that Slc:Hartley guinea pigs frequently possess asymptomatic duplicated caudal vena cava. The prevalence was 30% and 24% for males and females, respectively, with no sex-related differences. In accordance with Saad et al. (2012)'s criteria, duplicated caudal vena cava were classified into two distinct variations. The dominant variation was a complete duplication without iliac anastomosis where the left caudal vena cava continued from the left common iliac vein and joined the left renal vein; the left renal vein ran to the right to join the right caudal vena cava. The alternative variation was an incomplete duplication where the left caudal vena cava joined the right infrarenal caudal vena cava at a more cranial point than in normal cases; the renal segment was unchanged. Iliac anastomosis was not found in any cases. Duplicated caudal vena cava neither affected the body weight nor the kidney weight. In conclusion, Slc:Hartley guinea pigs frequently possess asymptomatic duplicated caudal vena cava in the absence of iliac anastomosis and appear to be a novel and useful animal model for duplicated caudal vena cava in animals and humans.
During embryogenesis, vertebrates generally develop symmetrical organs, but a number of
organs break this symmetry, such as the heart, liver, spleen, and caudal vena cava (inferior
vena cava in humans) [7]. In mammals, the caudal vena
cava receives blood from the caudal trunk, abdomen, pelvis, and caudal limbs, and delivers
it to the right atrium of the heart. The caudal vena cava arises from three pairs of
symmetrical veins but the right vein only remains through a complex process including
development, regression and anastomosis [4, 5]. Firstly, the postcardinal veins appear and drain the
caudal trunk. Secondly, the subcardinal veins develop craniomedially to the postcardinal
veins, while the postcardinal veins gradually regress, except for their caudal ends which
remain as the common iliac veins. Thirdly, the supracardinal veins then start to develop and
contribute to the venous drainage, while the left subcardinal vein completely regresses, yet
the right subcardinal vein remains. After these complex processes, the caudal vena cava is
composed of four segments: infrarenal, renal, suprarenal and hepatic segments [3, 4]. The
infrarenal segment is derived from the right supracardinal vein, while the anastomosis
between supracardinal and subcardinal veins forms the renal segment. The suprarenal segment
is derived from the cranial end of the right subcardinal vein and the hepatic segment
develops from the right hepatic vein [3,4,5].Duplication of the infrarenal caudal vena cava is normally found in whales and dolphins
[10]; however, it is recognized as a rare
congenital anomaly in both companion animals and humans [1,2,3]. Recently, computed tomography has revealed that the identified anomalies are
more common than initially expected [1,2,3, 9, 11]. For
example, in dogs, the prevalence of duplicated caudal vena cava is 0.46% by ultrasound
imaging but 2.08% by computed tomography [2]. Although
the duplicated caudal vena cava appears asymptomatic, double caudal vena cava is linked with
higher risks of thromboembolic events in humans [4],
and has significant association with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs [2]. Although experimental animal models are useful for the
evaluation of pathogenesis and complications of duplicated caudal vena cava, no experimental
animal models possessing double caudal vena cava currently exist.Guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) are experimental animals belonging to the
family Caviidae, unlike mice and rats which are classified in the family Muridae [8]. Like humans, guinea pigs are susceptible to
tuberculosis bacterium and cannot produce vitamin C by themselves; guinea pigs have
therefore been used as animal models for human medical conditions such as scurvy and
tuberculosis [8]. Although guinea pigs have commonly
been replaced by mice and rats, they are still used for the study of allergic reactions to
pharmaceuticals and medical devices [6]. In the
present study, we introduce asymptomatic duplicated caudal vena cava found in Slc:Hartley
guinea pigs, available from Japan SLC, Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan).
Materials and Methods
Animal experimentation was performed in accordance with the guidelines of Chitose
Laboratory, Japan Food Research Laboratories (approval No. HK180110-01). A hundred
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs (male: 50, female: 50) purchased from Japan SLC, Inc. were used in
this study. The animals, aged between six to ten weeks, were euthanized by excess inhalation
of isoflurane, and the abdominal cavity was observed macroscopically. Subsequently, some
guinea pigs were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin. The fixed abdomen was dehydrated
and defatted with graded alcohol followed by pure acetone, then embedded with polyester
resin (Maruto, Tokyo, Japan). Abdominal sections were sliced transversally using a circular
diamond cutter (Microcutter, Maruto) at approximately 2-mm intervals, and were ground by
hand. The sections were observed using an all-in-one fluorescence microscope (BZ-X800,
Keyence, Osaka, Japan). Some animals were euthanized by cutting the abdominal aorta under
deep anesthesia with isoflurane, and the kidneys were weighed.Duplicated vena cava was categorized into three types; i.e., complete, complete with iliac
anastomosis, and incomplete, as previously reported [11]. A complete duplication was defined by the presence of both the right and left
caudal vena cava. A complete duplication with iliac anastomosis was identified by the
presence of the two caudal vena cavae and iliac anastomosis. An incomplete duplication was
identified when the two caudal vena cavae were present but joined each other more cranially
than the end of the abdominal aorta.The results are expressed as mean ± SE. The Mann-Whitney U test was used
to compare data between two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare data among
three groups or more. The categorical data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.
Results
In all Slc:Hartley guinea pigs, the abdominal aorta ran at the midline and branched to the
ambilateral common iliac arteries (Fig. 1A). In normal Slc:Hartley guinea pigs, the infrarenal caudal vena cava continued from
the ambilateral common iliac veins at the caudal end of the abdominal aorta, and ran along
the right side of the abdominal aorta (Fig. 1A).
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs presented with duplication of the caudal vena cava at the infrarenal
segment in 15 out of 50 males (30%) and 12 out of 50 females (24%) without sex-related
differences (Fig. 1A and Table 1). The duplicated caudal vena cava was classified into two distinct variations,
in accordance with the criteria outlined by Saad et al. [11]. The dominant variation was a complete duplication
where the left caudal vena cava continued from the left common iliac vein (Fig. 1A). The two infrarenal segments of the caudal
vena cava ran symmetrically along the lateral border of the abdominal aorta and had
approximately same caliber (Figs. 1A and B). The
iliac anastomosis was not found in all cases with complete duplication. Complete duplication
was observed in 28% of males and 18% of females with no sex-related differences (Table 1). Another variation was an incomplete
duplication, where the left caudal vena cava continued from the left common iliac vein, but
ran ventrally to the abdominal aorta and joined with the right caudal vena cava more
cranially than the caudal end of the abdominal aorta (Fig. 1A). The renal segment and the gonadal vein had the same structures as those
found in normal cases (Fig. 1A). Iliac anastomosis
was not identified in any cases. Incomplete duplication was found in 2% and 6% of male and
females, respectively (Table 1).
Fig. 1.
Gross anatomy of the infrarenal segment of caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea
pigs. Representative image of male guinea pigs is shown. (A) Macroscopical features of
the infrarenal segment of caudal vena cava. (B) Transverse sections of the infrarenal
segment of caudal vena cava in caudal view. The sections were prepared from tissues
harvested from the positions indicated by the arrowheads (i, ii, iii) in panel A. In
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs with duplicated caudal vena cava, the lumbar veins either
reach the right caudal vena cava (ii) or separately joined the left and right caudal
vena cavae (iii). AA, abdominal aorta; CIV, common iliac vein; CVC, caudal vena cava;
LV, lumbar vein; TV, testicular vein. The asterisks indicate the caudal end of the
abdominal aorta.
Table 1.
Prevalence of duplicated vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs
Sex
Sample size
Complete
Complete with iliac anastomosis
Incomplete
Normal
Total
100
23 (23%)
0
4 (4%)
73 (73%)
Male
50
14 (28%)
0
1 (2%)
35 (70%)
Female
50
9 (18%)
0
3 (6%)
38 (76%)
P-value
P=0.342
P=1.000
P=0.617
P=0.510
Gross anatomy of the infrarenal segment of caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea
pigs. Representative image of male guinea pigs is shown. (A) Macroscopical features of
the infrarenal segment of caudal vena cava. (B) Transverse sections of the infrarenal
segment of caudal vena cava in caudal view. The sections were prepared from tissues
harvested from the positions indicated by the arrowheads (i, ii, iii) in panel A. In
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs with duplicated caudal vena cava, the lumbar veins either
reach the right caudal vena cava (ii) or separately joined the left and right caudal
vena cavae (iii). AA, abdominal aorta; CIV, common iliac vein; CVC, caudal vena cava;
LV, lumbar vein; TV, testicular vein. The asterisks indicate the caudal end of the
abdominal aorta.In all normal cases, the left and right lumbar vein crossed at the midline and reached the
right caudal vena cava (Fig. 1B). Slc:Hartley
guinea pigs with duplicated caudal vena cava had two variations in the angioplasty of lumbar
vein although the prevalence was not examined in this study. One variation showed the same
structures as those found in normal cases (Fig.
1B). In another variation, the left and right lumbar vein separately joined the left
and right caudal vena cavae, respectively (Fig.
1B).At the renal segment of caudal vena cava in normal guinea pigs, the left gonadal vein
drained the left renal vein (Fig. 2A). The left renal vein ran ventrally of the abdominal aorta and joined the right
caudal vena cava (Fig. 2A). The right gonadal vein
joined the caudal vena cava at a position slightly caudal to the right renal vein (Fig. 2A). In guinea pigs with complete duplication of
the caudal vena cava, the left gonadal vein drained the border between the left caudal vena
cava and left renal vein (Figs. 2A and B). The
left renal vein collected the left caudal vena cava at the midline, and ran ventrally of the
abdominal aorta to joined with the right caudal vena cava (Figs. 2A and B). The right gonadal vein ran similarly as that
observed in case of normal guinea pigs (Fig. 2A).
The running route of the infrarenal and renal segments of the caudal vena cava in
SLC:Hartley guinea pigs are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 2.
Gross anatomy of the renal segment of caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs.
Representative image of male guinea pigs is shown. (A) Macroscopical features of the
renal segment of caudal vena cava. Red, caudal vena cava; green, renal vein; yellow,
testicular vein. (B) Transverse sections of the renal segment of caudal vena cava in
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs with complete duplicated caudal vena cava, caudal view. The
sections were prepared from tissues harvested from the positions indicated by
arrowheads (i, ii, iii, iv, v) in panel A. The images are numbered from the caudal
end. AA, abdominal aorta; CVC, caudal vena cava; RV, renal vein; TV, testicular vein.
Arrows indicate junction of the caudal vena cava and the testicular vein.
Fig. 3.
The running route of the duplicated caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs.
Blue, red, and gray indicate vein, artery, and kidney, respectively. CIV, common iliac
vein; CVC, caudal vena cava; GV, gonadal vein.
Gross anatomy of the renal segment of caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs.
Representative image of male guinea pigs is shown. (A) Macroscopical features of the
renal segment of caudal vena cava. Red, caudal vena cava; green, renal vein; yellow,
testicular vein. (B) Transverse sections of the renal segment of caudal vena cava in
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs with complete duplicated caudal vena cava, caudal view. The
sections were prepared from tissues harvested from the positions indicated by
arrowheads (i, ii, iii, iv, v) in panel A. The images are numbered from the caudal
end. AA, abdominal aorta; CVC, caudal vena cava; RV, renal vein; TV, testicular vein.
Arrows indicate junction of the caudal vena cava and the testicular vein.The running route of the duplicated caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs.
Blue, red, and gray indicate vein, artery, and kidney, respectively. CIV, common iliac
vein; CVC, caudal vena cava; GV, gonadal vein.In male guinea pigs at six weeks of age, when they are most commonly used for the
biological safety test, body weight and kidney weight were unaffected by the duplicated
caudal vena cava (Figs. 4A–C). Although the ratio of left to right kidney weight was slightly lower in the guinea
pigs with duplicated caudal vena cava than in normal cases, the difference was not found to
be significant (Fig. 4D).
Fig. 4.
Effect of duplicated caudal vena cava on body weight and kidney weight in male
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs. (A) Body weight, (B) Kidney weight, (C) Kidney weight per
body weight, and (D) Ratio of left per right kidney weight. DVC, duplicated vena
cava.
Effect of duplicated caudal vena cava on body weight and kidney weight in male
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs. (A) Body weight, (B) Kidney weight, (C) Kidney weight per
body weight, and (D) Ratio of left per right kidney weight. DVC, duplicated vena
cava.
Discussion
This study identified that Slc:Hartley guinea pigs frequently possess duplicated caudal
vena cava, with no sex-related differences. Duplicated caudal/inferior vena cava have been
reported in both companion animals and humans at 2.08% in dogs with breed-related
differences (0.52–10.71%) [2], 7.0% in cats [1], and 0.2–3.0% in humans [4]. In the present study, we found 27% of Slc:Hartley guinea pigs to possess
duplicated caudal vena cava at the infrarenal segment. The prevalence was much higher than
has been reported for other animal species, with the exception of whales and dolphins which
have paired caudal vena cavae [10]. To our knowledge,
the duplication of the caudal vena cava has not been reported in other strains of guinea
pigs, indicating a strain-specific phenotype in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs. Although the
bilateral lumbar veins reach the right caudal vena cava in dogs with duplicated caudal vena
cava [1], the Slc:Hartley guinea pigs with duplicated
caudal vena cava presented with both the asymmetrical and symmetrical lumbar veins,
indicating that the development of the caudal vena cava is associated with that of the
lumbar vein. Since Slc:Hartley guinea pigs had higher prevalence of duplicated caudal vena
cava, and the examination of the fetal development is easier than in companion animals,
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs are novel and useful models for the study of duplicated vena
cava.In humans, duplicated inferior vena cava has been categorized by several researchers
according to the caliber and angioplasty of the infrarenal inferior vena cava, and presence
and angle of the iliac anastomosis [3, 11]. Saad et al. (2012) categorized
these anomalies based on the caliber and angioplasty of the infrarenal inferior vena cava
and the presence of the iliac anastomosis [11]. This
classification was applied to categorize variations of duplicated caudal vena cava in guinea
pigs in addition to dogs [2], indicating that this
criterion is useful for inter-species comparison of duplicated caudal vena cava. According
to this classification, the dominant variation was different among mammalian species. Most
cases of duplicated caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs, were classified as complete
duplication without iliac anastomosis, as was the case in dogs [2]. In humans, a complete duplication with iliac anastomosis has been
reported to be more common, and shows variable patterns in the angle of the iliac
anastomosis, while prevalence of complete duplication without iliac anastomosis has been
reported to be between 20.2% [9] and 33% [3]. The male to female ratio additionally appears to
differ among species. In Slc:Hartley guinea pigs, dogs, and cats, no sex-related differences
have been reported [1, 2]. On the other hand, duplicated inferior vena cava is predominantly found in
human males, although that remains under debate [3].
The present study could not address the origin of the duplicated vena cava, whether it is
the regression of the iliac anastomosis, or the persistence of the left supracardinal veins.
However, the origin of double infrarenal caudal vena cavae may be due to the persistence of
both the supracardinal veins, since the iliac anastomosis is often present in humans with
duplicated inferior vena cava [3, 4, 9].In multiple breeds of dogs, body weight has not been associated with the caudal vena cava
when analyzed by multivariable logistic regression model [2]. Our study revealed that neither the body weight nor the kidney weight are
associated with the duplication of caudal vena cava using a single strain of guinea pigs,
indicating that such duplications are asymptomatic under physiological conditions.
Slc:Hartley guinea pigs have been used in the biological safety tests [6]; therefore, it should be acknowledged that the congenital anomalies may
influence these results. This study indicates that the presence of duplicated caudal vena
cava does not limit the applicability of these guinea pigs in toxicity test, since they were
asymptomatic under physiological conditions. However, careful attention must be paid if some
toxicities are found when using this strain.In conclusion, Slc:Hartley guinea pigs are novel and useful animal models for duplicated
caudal vena cava in both companion animals and humans. The prevalence and anatomical
variations in the development and duplication of caudal vena cava among species may be the
manifestation of the underlying genetic factors rather than sporadic factors. Further
studies need to be undertaken to establish inbred guinea pigs possessing the duplicated
caudal vena cava to elucidate the genetic mechanism and identify the responsible genes.
Although knowledge on the genetic information of guinea pigs is limited, a whole-genome
sequencing approach can be utilized to elucidate the molecular pathogenesis responsible for
duplication of the caudal vena cava in Slc:Hartley guinea pigs.