Literature DB >> 31142675

Sustained correction of associative learning deficits after brief, early treatment in a rat model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Antonis Asiminas1,2,3, Adam D Jackson1,2,3,4, Susana R Louros1,2,3, Sally M Till1,2,3, Teresa Spano1,2,3,4, Owen Dando1,2,3,5, Mark F Bear6, Sumantra Chattarji2,3,4, Giles E Hardingham1,2,3,5, Emily K Osterweil1,2,3, David J A Wyllie1,2,3,4, Emma R Wood7,2,3,4, Peter C Kind7,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is one of the most common monogenic forms of autism and intellectual disability. Preclinical studies in animal models have highlighted the potential of pharmaceutical intervention strategies for alleviating the symptoms of FXS. However, whether treatment strategies can be tailored to developmental time windows that define the emergence of particular phenotypes is unknown. Similarly, whether a brief, early intervention can have long-lasting beneficial effects, even after treatment cessation, is also unknown. To address these questions, we first examined the developmental profile for the acquisition of associative learning in a rat model of FXS. Associative memory was tested using a range of behavioral paradigms that rely on an animal's innate tendency to explore novelty. Fmr1 knockout (KO) rats showed a developmental delay in their acquisition of object-place recognition and did not demonstrate object-place-context recognition paradigm at any age tested (up to 23 weeks of age). Treatment of Fmr1 KO rats with lovastatin between 5 and 9 weeks of age, during the normal developmental period that this associative memory capability is established, prevents the emergence of deficits but has no effect in wild-type animals. Moreover, we observe no regression of cognitive performance in the FXS rats over several months after treatment. This restoration of the normal developmental trajectory of cognitive function is associated with the sustained rescue of both synaptic plasticity and altered protein synthesis. The findings provide proof of concept that the impaired emergence of the cognitive repertoire in neurodevelopmental disorders may be prevented by brief, early pharmacological intervention.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31142675      PMCID: PMC8162683          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao0498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  48 in total

Review 1.  Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?

Authors:  M W Brown; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The developmental switch in GABA polarity is delayed in fragile X mice.

Authors:  Qionger He; Toshihiro Nomura; Jian Xu; Anis Contractor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Sensitive and critical periods during neurotypical and aberrant neurodevelopment: a framework for neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  R M Meredith
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Developmental trajectories of executive functions in young males with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Stephen R Hooper; Deborah Hatton; John Sideris; Kelly Sullivan; Peter A Ornstein; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 5.  Critical periods in speech perception: new directions.

Authors:  Janet F Werker; Takao K Hensch
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Age-Dependent Long-Term Potentiation Deficits in the Prefrontal Cortex of the Fmr1 Knockout Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Henry G S Martin; Olivier Lassalle; Jonathan T Brown; Olivier J Manzoni
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  A point mutation in the FMR-1 gene associated with fragile X mental retardation.

Authors:  K De Boulle; A J Verkerk; E Reyniers; L Vits; J Hendrickx; B Van Roy; F Van den Bos; E de Graaff; B A Oostra; P J Willems
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Correction of fragile X syndrome in mice.

Authors:  Gül Dölen; Emily Osterweil; B S Shankaranarayana Rao; Gordon B Smith; Benjamin D Auerbach; Sumantra Chattarji; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Chronic pharmacological mGlu5 inhibition corrects fragile X in adult mice.

Authors:  Aubin Michalon; Michael Sidorov; Theresa M Ballard; Laurence Ozmen; Will Spooren; Joseph G Wettstein; Georg Jaeschke; Mark F Bear; Lothar Lindemann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Arbaclofen in fragile X syndrome: results of phase 3 trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Randi Hagerman; Jeannie Visootsak; Dejan Budimirovic; Walter E Kaufmann; Maryann Cherubini; Peter Zarevics; Karen Walton-Bowen; Paul Wang; Mark F Bear; Randall L Carpenter
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  15 in total

1.  Selective inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3α corrects pathophysiology in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Patrick K McCamphill; Laura J Stoppel; Rebecca K Senter; Michael C Lewis; Arnold J Heynen; David C Stoppel; Vinay Sridhar; Katie A Collins; Xi Shi; Jen Q Pan; Jon Madison; Jeffrey R Cottrell; Kimberly M Huber; Edward M Scolnick; Edward B Holson; Florence F Wagner; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  Adaptive control of synaptic plasticity integrates micro- and macroscopic network function.

Authors:  Daniel N Scott; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 8.294

3.  FMRP Sustains Presynaptic Function via Control of Activity-Dependent Bulk Endocytosis.

Authors:  Katherine Bonnycastle; Peter C Kind; Michael A Cousin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 4.  FMRP and CYFIP1 at the Synapse and Their Role in Psychiatric Vulnerability.

Authors:  Nicholas E Clifton; Kerrie L Thomas; Lawrence S Wilkinson; Jeremy Hall; Simon Trent
Journal:  Complex Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-03

5.  Cell-type-specific profiling of human cellular models of fragile X syndrome reveal PI3K-dependent defects in translation and neurogenesis.

Authors:  Nisha Raj; Zachary T McEachin; William Harousseau; Ying Zhou; Feiran Zhang; Megan E Merritt-Garza; J Matthew Taliaferro; Magdalena Kalinowska; Samuele G Marro; Chadwick M Hales; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Marisol W Wolf-Ochoa; Veronica Martinez-Cerdeño; Marius Wernig; Lu Chen; Eric Klann; Stephen T Warren; Peng Jin; Zhexing Wen; Gary J Bassell
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Considerations for Clinical Therapeutic Development of Statins for Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Myrthe J Ottenhoff; Lianne C Krab; Ype Elgersma
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 7.  Experimental Models to Study Autism Spectrum Disorders: hiPSCs, Rodents and Zebrafish.

Authors:  Alba Pensado-López; Sara Veiga-Rúa; Ángel Carracedo; Catarina Allegue; Laura Sánchez
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Rescue of oxytocin response and social behaviour in a mouse model of autism.

Authors:  Hanna Hörnberg; Enrique Pérez-Garci; Dietmar Schreiner; Laetitia Hatstatt-Burklé; Fulvio Magara; Stephane Baudouin; Alex Matter; Kassoum Nacro; Eline Pecho-Vrieseling; Peter Scheiffele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Input-Output Relationship of CA1 Pyramidal Neurons Reveals Intact Homeostatic Mechanisms in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Sam A Booker; Laura Simões de Oliveira; Natasha J Anstey; Zrinko Kozic; Owen R Dando; Adam D Jackson; Paul S Baxter; Lori L Isom; Diane L Sherman; Giles E Hardingham; Peter J Brophy; David J A Wyllie; Peter C Kind
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  A Differential Effect of Lovastatin versus Simvastatin in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Melania Muscas; Sang S Seo; Susana R Louros; Emily K Osterweil
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.