Literature DB >> 31142473

Lupus-associated atypical memory B cells are mTORC1-hyperactivated and functionally dysregulated.

Chunmei Wu1,2, Qiong Fu1, Qiang Guo1, Sheng Chen1, Shyamal Goswami2, Shuhui Sun1, Teng Li2, Xingjian Cao3, Fuying Chu3, Zechuan Chen2, Mei Liu2, Yuanhua Liu2, Ting Fu2, Pei Hao2, Yi Hao4, Nan Shen1, Chunde Bao5, Xiaoming Zhang6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A population of atypical memory B cells (AtMs) are greatly expanded in patients with active lupus, but their generation and pathophysiological roles are poorly defined. The aim of this study was to comprehensively characterise lupus AtMs with a purpose to identify therapeutic clues to target this B cell population in lupus.
METHODS: Peripheral B cell subsets were measured by flow cytometry. Sorting-purified B cell subsets were subject to RNA sequencing and functional studies. Plasma cytokines and secreted immunoglobulins were detected by Luminex or ELISA. In situ renal B cells were detected by multiplexed immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: CD24-CD20hi AtMs were strongly increased in two Chinese cohorts of patients with treatment-naïve lupus. Gene expression profile indicated that B cell signalling and activation, lipid/saccharide metabolism and endocytosis pathways were abnormally upregulated in lupus AtMs. In addition, the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway was remarkably activated in lupus AtMs, and blocking mTORC1 signalling by rapamycin abolished the generation of T-bet+ B cells and terminal differentiation of lupus AtMs. Furthermore, lupus AtMs displayed a dysfunctional phenotype, underwent accelerated apoptosis, poorly co-stimulated T cells and produced proinflammatory cytokines. Interestingly, lupus AtMs were in a paradoxically differentiated status with markers pro and against terminal differentiation and enriched with antinucleosome reactivity. Finally, AtMs were accumulated in the kidneys of patients with lupus nephritis and associated with disease severity.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that mTORC1-overactivated lupus AtMs are abnormally differentiated with metabolic and functional dysregulations. Inhibiting mTORC1 signalling might be an attractive option to target AtMs and to improve therapeutic effectiveness in patients with lupus. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B cells; cytokines; systemic lupus erythematosus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31142473      PMCID: PMC6691860          DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


T-bet+CD11c+ atypical memory B cells (AtMs) are greatly expanded in lupus and implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We find that the mTORC1 pathway is highly activated in lupus AtMs and plays a critical role in the generation and terminal differentiation of these cells. Importantly, inhibiting mTORC1 signalling by rapamycin blocks T-bet+ B cell generation and the terminal differentiation of AtMs. Our study also demonstrates that AtMs are aberrantly differentiated, metabolically abnormal and functionally dysregulated. In addition, the abundance of AtMs both in the blood and in the kidneys of patients with lupus nephritis reflects the disease activity, indicating that AtMs could be a novel biomarker for patients with lupus. Targeting AtMs by inhibiting mTORC1 signalling pathway could be an attractive option to improve therapeutic effectiveness in patients with SLE.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease triggered by loss of self-tolerance and the resultant autoreactive cellular and humoral immune responses, leading to a striking heterogeneity of clinical manifestations and organ dysfunction.1 2 B cell abnormality plays a central role in the development of SLE by contributing to the overproduction of autoantibodies, cytokines and augmented presentation of autoantigens to T cells.3 4 The B cell compartment is highly distorted in patients with active SLE. Transitional B cells and plasmablasts are greatly increased, while non-switched memory B cells are decreased in active SLE.5–7 In addition, a population of atypical memory B cells (AtMs) sharing similar phenotypes and identified as CD19hi,8 CD19hiCD21lo,5 9 CD27−IgD− 10 11 are expanded in active SLE. Increased frequency of these AtMs has been associated with high disease activity and disease-specific autoantibodies such as anti-Smith (Sm) antibody,8 10 suggesting that these cells are associated with disease development. Phenotypically similar B cells were also expanded in other autoimmune diseases like primary Sjoegren’s syndrome, systemic sclerosis5 and infectious diseases like HIV infection,12 hepatitis C virus infection13 and malaria.14 Thus, an environment of chronic inflammation seems to promote the generation of these B cells. Recent studies have revealed that human AtMs specifically express transcription factor (TF) T-bet and integrin CD11c15–17 which are closely linked to a population of B cells named age-associated B cells (ABCs) in aged female mice and young lupus-prone mice.18 19 Murine ABCs are T-bet+CD11c+ and enriched with antichromatin autoantibodies which play an essential role in lupus development.16 19 Furthermore, T-bet is necessary and sufficient for the generation of murine CD11c+ ABCs20 and deletion of T-bet in B cells causes a loss of CD11c+ ABCs and the amelioration of disease in lupus-prone mice.16 21 These studies demonstrated a common pathogenic role of T-bet+CD11c+ B cells in both human lupus and murine lupus models. The identification of a population of atypical memory T-bet+CD11c+ B cells in patients with SLE raises the possibility that targeting this population may open new therapeutic opportunities for this complex disease, as the efficacies of B cell depletion therapy by targeting whole B cells in patients with SLE are highly variable.1 22 Particularly, it was reported that an expanded population of CD19hi AtMs in patients with SLE predicts a poor clinical response to rituximab treatment.8 Although several factors including Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL) 21 have been implicated in the differentiation of AtMs,19 20 23 24 no clinically targetable pathway has been identified so far. Thus, to identify the key pathway leading to their generation and to develop feasible strategies to block their development represent an urgent need in lupus B cell study. In this study, we aim to perform a comprehensive study of lupus AtMs at molecular, cellular, functional and clinical levels, with a purpose to uncover the unknown nature of AtMs and provide clues to target these cells in clinics.

Results

AtMs are increased in patients with lupus and correlated with disease activity

We have analysed peripheral B cell subsets in a Chinese population of patients with new-onset treatment-naïve SLE by flow cytometry and observed that a population of CD24−CD20hi B cells was significantly increased in patients with SLE compared with patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and healthy donors (HDs) (mean±SEM, 7.54%±0.87%, range 0.19%–25.3%; 3.07%±0.45%, range 0.67%–10.6%; 1.56%±0.15%, range 0.39%–3.68%; respectively) (figure 1A,B) (Detailed characteristics of the three groups were listed in online supplementary table 1). Phenotypical analysis revealed that the CD24−CD20hi B cells expressed high levels of CD11c, T-bet and memory marker CD95, but didn’t express CD21, while the expression of the classical memory marker CD27 was variable (figure 1C), indicating that the CD24−CD20hi B cells were corresponding to a population of AtMs identified in SLE10 16 17 as well as in chronically infectious diseases12 14 and the healthy elderly.25
Figure 1

Atypical memory B cells (AtMs) were increased in the blood of patients with active SLE. (A) Flow cytometry analysis showed the frequency of circulating CD24−CD20hiAtMs among total B cells (AtMs%B) in healthy donor (HD), patient with RA and patient with new-onset SLE. (B) Comparison of circulating AtMs%B among HD (n=30), patient with RA (n=33) and patient with new-onset SLE (n=54). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of differentially expressed markers between peripheral CD24+CD20+ B cells and CD24−C20hi B cells in patients with active SLE. For each marker, one representative plot out of three to four was shown. (D) Correlations between circulating AtMs%B and SLEDAI Scores, titres of serum ANUA and anti-dsDNA of patients with new-onset SLE (n=54). (E) Comparison of circulating AtMs%B between patients with new-onset lupus nephritis (LN) (n=16) and without LN (n=38). (F) Changes of circulating AtMs%B in patients with new-onset SLE before and after treatments (at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24, n=23). (G) Changes of circulating AtMs%B in patients with new-onset SLE in the remission group (n=15) and flare/resistant group (n=8) before and after treatments (at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24), and comparison of circulating AtMs%B between two groups at week 24. Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (B), Spearman’s rank correlation (D), Mann-Whitney test (E and G) and Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (F and G). ANUA, antinucleosome antibody; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

Atypical memory B cells (AtMs) were increased in the blood of patients with active SLE. (A) Flow cytometry analysis showed the frequency of circulating CD24−CD20hiAtMs among total B cells (AtMs%B) in healthy donor (HD), patient with RA and patient with new-onset SLE. (B) Comparison of circulating AtMs%B among HD (n=30), patient with RA (n=33) and patient with new-onset SLE (n=54). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of differentially expressed markers between peripheral CD24+CD20+ B cells and CD24−C20hi B cells in patients with active SLE. For each marker, one representative plot out of three to four was shown. (D) Correlations between circulating AtMs%B and SLEDAI Scores, titres of serum ANUA and anti-dsDNA of patients with new-onset SLE (n=54). (E) Comparison of circulating AtMs%B between patients with new-onset lupus nephritis (LN) (n=16) and without LN (n=38). (F) Changes of circulating AtMs%B in patients with new-onset SLE before and after treatments (at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24, n=23). (G) Changes of circulating AtMs%B in patients with new-onset SLE in the remission group (n=15) and flare/resistant group (n=8) before and after treatments (at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24), and comparison of circulating AtMs%B between two groups at week 24. Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (B), Spearman’s rank correlation (D), Mann-Whitney test (E and G) and Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (F and G). ANUA, antinucleosome antibody; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. We then assessed the clinical relevance of these lupus AtMs. We found that the frequency of circulating AtMs was positively correlated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) Scores, titres of serum antinucleosome antibody (ANUA) and anti-dsDNA, while negatively correlated with serum complement 3 (C3) and C4 (figure 1D and online supplementary figure 1A). We further showed that the frequency of AtMs was much higher in lupus nephritis (LN) compared with those patients without renal involvement (figure 1E), and was negatively correlated with blood haemoglobin concentration (online supplementary figure 1B). Furthermore the frequency of lupus AtMs was positively correlated with a panel of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-18, IFN-α and IFN-γ in plasma (online supplementary figure 1C). We confirmed the correlation between AtMs and disease activity in a second cohort of 19 patients with new-onset lupus (online supplementary table 2). Either defined as CD24−CD20hi or CD11c+CD24-CD20hi, the frequencies of both AtMs were positively correlated with SLEDAI Scores and negatively correlated with serum C3 concentrations (online supplementary figure 1D–F). Twenty-three patients from the first cohort who have received standard therapy were followed up for 24 weeks (online supplementary tables 3 and 4). The frequencies of AtMs were rapidly decreased 4 weeks after treatment and maintained at relatively low levels thereafter (figure 1F). Strikingly, we observed a significant increase of AtMs in a subgroup of eight patients who experienced relapses or showed resistance to the treatment at week 24 (figure 1G). These results suggest that AtMs could be a potential biomarker to monitor disease activity and predict disease flare.

Lupus AtMs exhibit a unique gene expression profile with BCR activation and metabolic dysregulation

To explore the molecular features of lupus AtMs, we performed an RNA-seq-based gene expression profiling of AtMs and classical memory B cells (CMs) from six patients with new-onset SLE, as well as CMs from five HDs. Principal component analysis separated the three memory B cell populations apart (figure 2A). Venn diagrams showed that 578 genes were significantly upregulated and 384 genes were significantly downregulated in lupus AtMs compared with lupus CMs and healthy CMs, respectively (figure 2B). Gene clustering analysis classified the differentially expressed genes into two major clusters: lupus AtMs high and low expressions (figure 2C). With gene ontology terms as the reference, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)26 identified three pathways were predominantly upregulated in lupus AtMs compared with CMs: B cell signalling and activation, lipid and saccharide metabolism and endocytosis (figure 2D,E and online supplementary figure 2A). By contrast, RNA/protein synthesis-related pathways were dampened in lupus AtMs (online supplementary figure 2B).
Figure 2

Lupus atypical memory B cells (AtMs) displayed a unique gene expression profile from CMs. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of the RNA-Seq data showed the differential gene expression profiles of CMs from HD (n=5), CMs and AtMs from patients with new-onset SLE (n=6). (B) Venn diagrams of RNA-Seq differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of AtMs-SLE compared with CMs-SLE or CMs-HD. (C) Unbiased hierarchical clustering was performed to show the 2688 DEGs from AtMs-SLE, CMs-SLE and CMs-HD. The selection criterion was fold change (FC) >2, P value adj <0.05 between any two populations. (D–E) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified the pathways of B cell signalling/activation (D) and lipid and saccharide metabolism (E) were highly enriched in AtMs-SLE compared with CMs-SLE based on gene expression data from RNA-seq. (F–G) Flow cytometry analysis (F) and accumulated data (G) of the differentially expressed markers of BCR signalling at baseline between AtMs and CMs from same patients with SLE (n=6). P values were determined by paired t test (G). CMs, classical memory B cells; HD, healthy donor; NES, normalised enrichment score; PC1, Principal Component 1; PC2, Principal Component 2; PC3, Principal Component 3; ISO, isotype; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

Lupus atypical memory B cells (AtMs) displayed a unique gene expression profile from CMs. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of the RNA-Seq data showed the differential gene expression profiles of CMs from HD (n=5), CMs and AtMs from patients with new-onset SLE (n=6). (B) Venn diagrams of RNA-Seq differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of AtMs-SLE compared with CMs-SLE or CMs-HD. (C) Unbiased hierarchical clustering was performed to show the 2688 DEGs from AtMs-SLE, CMs-SLE and CMs-HD. The selection criterion was fold change (FC) >2, P value adj <0.05 between any two populations. (D–E) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified the pathways of B cell signalling/activation (D) and lipid and saccharide metabolism (E) were highly enriched in AtMs-SLE compared with CMs-SLE based on gene expression data from RNA-seq. (F–G) Flow cytometry analysis (F) and accumulated data (G) of the differentially expressed markers of BCR signalling at baseline between AtMs and CMs from same patients with SLE (n=6). P values were determined by paired t test (G). CMs, classical memory B cells; HD, healthy donor; NES, normalised enrichment score; PC1, Principal Component 1; PC2, Principal Component 2; PC3, Principal Component 3; ISO, isotype; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. Consistent with the above pathway analysis, we observed that lupus AtMs displayed heightened B cell receptor (BCR) signalling (pSyk(Y348), pSyk(Y352), pBTK(Y551/511) and pPLCγ2(Y759)) compared with lupus CMs at steady state (figure 2F,G). However, following BCR cross-linking, lupus CMs rapidly upregulated phosphorylated BCR signalling molecules while limited increase was observed in AtMs (online supplementary figure 2C). This BCR responding feature is similar to that observed in the AtMs from malaria-infected patients27 which indicates that AtMs are not intrinsically highly responding to BCR stimulation.

mTORC1 pathway is highly activated and implicated in the differentiation of AtMs

The increased BCR signalling in lupus AtMs at steady state prompted us to check the downstream signalling pathways. GSEA and gene differential analysis showed that the PI3K pathway was mobilised in lupus AtMs (figure 2D, online supplementary figure 3). Strikingly, using the HALLMARK database, GSEA identified that mTORC1 pathway, a key target of the PI3K/Akt pathway, was highly activated in lupus AtMs compared with CMs (figure 3A). Consistently, we observed increased phosphorylations of mTOR(Ser2448) and S6(Ser235/236) in lupus AtMs, indicating activation of the mTORC1 pathway28 29 in these cells. By contrast, the phosphorylation level of Akt(Ser473), a marker of mTORC2 activation,28 didn’t differ between AtMs and CMs in patients with SLE (figure 3B,C).
Figure 3

mTORC1 signalling pathway was implicated in the differentiation of atypical memory B cells (AtMs). (A) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified that the mTORC1 signalling pathway was enriched in lupus AtMs compared with CMs. (B ) Differential expression of mTOR signalling-related phosphorylated proteins between AtMs and CMs from the same patient with SLE, analysed by flow cytometry. One representative experiment out of four was shown. (C) Comparison of mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of the mTOR signalling pathway-related phosphorylated proteins between AtMs and CMs from the same patients with SLE (n=6). (D–E) Representative flow cytometry plots (D) and accumulated data (E) of the frequencies of p-S6+, CD11c−T-bet+ and CD11c+T-bet+ B cells generated from stimulated healthy donor B cells (n=6). For D, B cells were stimulated with IFNγ and R848 alone or in combination in the absence or presence of 0.1 nM rapamycin (rapa). For E, B cells were stimulated with the combination of IFNγ and R848 in the absence or presence of 0.1 nM rapamycin. (F) T-bet mRNA levels were measured in stimulated B cells for 6 hours (n=8). The stimulation conditions were the same as in (E) and the concentration of rapamycin was 10 nM. Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by paired t test (C) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (E and F). CMs, classical memory B cells; NES, normalised enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate; ISO, isotype; mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

mTORC1 signalling pathway was implicated in the differentiation of atypical memory B cells (AtMs). (A) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified that the mTORC1 signalling pathway was enriched in lupus AtMs compared with CMs. (B ) Differential expression of mTOR signalling-related phosphorylated proteins between AtMs and CMs from the same patient with SLE, analysed by flow cytometry. One representative experiment out of four was shown. (C) Comparison of mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of the mTOR signalling pathway-related phosphorylated proteins between AtMs and CMs from the same patients with SLE (n=6). (D–E) Representative flow cytometry plots (D) and accumulated data (E) of the frequencies of p-S6+, CD11cT-bet+ and CD11c+T-bet+ B cells generated from stimulated healthy donor B cells (n=6). For D, B cells were stimulated with IFNγ and R848 alone or in combination in the absence or presence of 0.1 nM rapamycin (rapa). For E, B cells were stimulated with the combination of IFNγ and R848 in the absence or presence of 0.1 nM rapamycin. (F) T-bet mRNA levels were measured in stimulated B cells for 6 hours (n=8). The stimulation conditions were the same as in (E) and the concentration of rapamycin was 10 nM. Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by paired t test (C) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (E and F). CMs, classical memory B cells; NES, normalised enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate; ISO, isotype; mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. Next we investigated whether the mTORC1 pathway is involved in the differentiation of T-bet+ AtMs. We chose an in vitro differentiation protocol by using IFN-γ and a TLR7 agonist R848, as both IFN-γ and TLR7 signalling were implicated in the differentiation of T-bet+ AtMs.19 23 30 The results showed that the combination of IFN-γ and R848 had a synergistic effect on mTORC1 activation reflected by the increased frequency of p-S6+ (phosphorylated S6(Ser235/236)) cells and the generation of CD11c+T-bet+ and CD11c-T-bet+ B cells (figure 3D–F). Interestingly, nearly all CD11c+T-bet+ and CD11c-T-bet+ B cells were p-S6+ while the frequency of p-S6+ cells within CD11cT-bet− B cells was significantly reduced (online supplementary figure 4A,B). The results suggest that T-bet expression in B cells could be associated with mTORC1 activation. To further explore this connexion, we tested the effect of Rapamycin, a specific inhibitor of mTORC1,31 on the differentiation of T-bet+ B cells. Consistent with an early report,32 Rapamycin decreased the viability and blocked the proliferation of IFN-γ/R848-stimulated B cells (online supplementary figure 4C-F). In gated live B cells, rapamycin strongly decreased the frequencies of p-S6+, as well as CD11c+T-bet+ and CD11cT-bet+ B cells (figure 3E). Rapamycin also strongly inhibited T-bet expression at mRNA level in stimulated B cells (figure 3F). To differentiate whether the inhibition of mTORC1 activation and T-bet expression by rapamycin is due to the inhibition of proliferation, we focused on non-proliferating B cells. The results showed that the phosphorylation of S6(Ser235/236) and T-bet expression were not dependent on proliferation and rapamycin strongly decreased the frequencies of p-S6+ and T-bet+ B cells in gated live non-proliferating B cells (online supplementary figure 4G,H). Collectively, these studies reveal a potential link of mTORC1 activation and the differentiation of T-bet+ B cells.

Lupus AtMs are enriched with antinucleosome reactivity despite impaired terminal differentiation

There have been inconsistent reports for the terminal differentiation potentials of AtMs, with evidence of normal17 33 or resistant12 27 34 to plasma cell differentiation. Our RNA-seq data showed that lupus AtMs expressed higher levels of B cell identity genes including PAX5, BCL6 and AICDA, and higher amounts of plasma cell-related genes like IRF4, XBP1 and SLAMF7 (figure 4A). At the protein level, AtMs expressed high levels of PAX5, BCL6 and IRF4 (figure 4B). PAX5 and BCL6 are TFs to maintain B cell identity while IRF4 is considered to promote plasma cell differentiation,35 thus AtMs seem to be in an aberrant state of differentiation.
Figure 4

AtMs exhibited altered ability of antibody secretion. (A) RNA-Seq data were used to compare the expression profiles of B cell identity and plasma cell differentiation-related genes between AtMs and CMs from active patients with SLE (n=6). (B) Flow cytometry analysis to show B cells and plasma cell differentiation-related transcription factors between CMs and AtMs from the same patients with SLE. One representative experiment out of four was shown. (C–D) Representative flow cytometry plots (C) and accumulated data (n=6) (D) to show the capacity of lupus AtMs and CMs to differentiate into CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts (PB) following the stimulation of CpG +IL-2+IL-10 for 7 days. Shown were the frequencies among live cells. (E–F) Comparison of the concentrations of secreted immunoglobulin IgA, IgM and IgG (E) or ANUA and anti-dsDNA levels based on the normalised IgG concentration (F) between AtMs and CMs from patients with SLE (n=6). (G–H) Representative flow cytometry plots (G) and accumulated data (H) (n=6) to show the capacity of lupus AtMs to differentiate into CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts following the stimulation of CpG +IL-2+IL-10 in the absence or presence of 0.01 nM and 0.1 nM rapamycin (rapa) for 7 days. (I–J) Changes in the concentration of IgG (I), ANUA and anti-dsDNA levels (J) secreted by AtMs-SLE after adding rapamycin (n=6). For A, Limma+voom (paired samples test) was used for differential analysis and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg multiple test. P values were determined by paired t test (D), Wilcoxon signed-rank test (E,F,J), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (H), and Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (I). ANUA, antinucleosome antibody; AtMs, atypical memory B cells; CMs, classical memory B cells; ISO, isotype; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

AtMs exhibited altered ability of antibody secretion. (A) RNA-Seq data were used to compare the expression profiles of B cell identity and plasma cell differentiation-related genes between AtMs and CMs from active patients with SLE (n=6). (B) Flow cytometry analysis to show B cells and plasma cell differentiation-related transcription factors between CMs and AtMs from the same patients with SLE. One representative experiment out of four was shown. (C–D) Representative flow cytometry plots (C) and accumulated data (n=6) (D) to show the capacity of lupus AtMs and CMs to differentiate into CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts (PB) following the stimulation of CpG +IL-2+IL-10 for 7 days. Shown were the frequencies among live cells. (E–F) Comparison of the concentrations of secreted immunoglobulin IgA, IgM and IgG (E) or ANUA and anti-dsDNA levels based on the normalised IgG concentration (F) between AtMs and CMs from patients with SLE (n=6). (G–H) Representative flow cytometry plots (G) and accumulated data (H) (n=6) to show the capacity of lupus AtMs to differentiate into CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts following the stimulation of CpG +IL-2+IL-10 in the absence or presence of 0.01 nM and 0.1 nM rapamycin (rapa) for 7 days. (I–J) Changes in the concentration of IgG (I), ANUA and anti-dsDNA levels (J) secreted by AtMs-SLE after adding rapamycin (n=6). For A, Limma+voom (paired samples test) was used for differential analysis and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg multiple test. P values were determined by paired t test (D), Wilcoxon signed-rank test (E,F,J), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (H), and Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (I). ANUA, antinucleosome antibody; AtMs, atypical memory B cells; CMs, classical memory B cells; ISO, isotype; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. Then we tested the terminal differentiation capacity of sorted lupus AtMs and CMs with a strong stimulating protocol (cytosine-phosphate-guanidine (CpG) 2006/IL-2/IL-10) for 7 days. We found that lupus AtMs displayed a compromised capacity to differentiate into CD27hiCD38hi plasmablasts (figure 4C,D) and to secrete immunoglobulins compared with CMs (figure 4E). Interestingly, after normalisation to the same concentrations, the secreted IgG from AtMs showed an enrichment of ANUA, but not anti-dsDNA antibodies compared with that of CMs (figure 4F). It was reported that mTORC1 signalling was important for plasma cell differentiation and antibody secretion;32 36 we found that rapamycin significantly blocked plasmablast generation, IgG and ANUA production from stimulated AtMs (figure 4G–J). Thus, the above studies indicate that lupus AtMs represented a unique B cell population aberrantly differentiated and enriched with antinucleosome reactivity. Furthermore, inhibiting the mTORC1 pathway could effectively block their terminal differentiation and the capacity to secrete autoantibodies.

Lupus AtMs are molecularly and phenotypically dysfunctional

We observed a panel of genes encoding inhibitory receptors (eg, PDCD1, FCRL3, ILIRB1, ILIRB2) linked to dysfunction or exhaustion in T cells12 27 were highly expressed in lupus AtMs (online supplementary figure 5A), and the dysfunctional phenotype was confirmed at the protein levels for most markers detected (online supplementary figure 5B). Furthermore, markers of B cell development and activation also showed aberrations at molecular and protein levels (online supplementary figure 5A and 6). TFs play a decisive role in coordinating cell fate and functions, however, the TF network of AtMs is not clear. We found that lupus AtMs expressed a similar TF gene profile to dysfunctional T cells,37 38 including increased expression of BATF, FOXO1, IKZF2, NFATc2, MAF and decreased expression of MAML2, ZEB2, ZBTB20 and TCF7 (online supplementary figure 5C). The enhanced expressions of NFATc2, BATF, FOXO1 and HELIOS were confirmed by flow cytometry (online supplementary figure 5B). Interestingly, we also found that lupus AtMs expressed higher levels of HIF1α and c-Myc (online supplementary figure 5B), two TFs associated with T cell dysfunction39 40 and metabolism.41 42 Thus, the dysfunctional phenotype of lupus AtMs could be linked to a unique metabolic status.

Lupus AtMs are apoptosis-prone, defective for proinflammatory cytokine production and poorly co-stimulate T cells to proliferate

Next we investigated the survival capacity of lupus AtMs. GSEA identified an apoptotic gene signature for lupus AtMs (figure 5A) and several antiapoptotic genes BCL2, PIM1, PIM2 and PIM3 were all decreased in AtMs compared with CMs (online supplementary figure 7A). The downexpression of BCL2 was confirmed at the protein level in AtMs by flow cytometry (online supplementary figure 7B). Consistent with these data, we found that the sorted lupus AtMs displayed significantly less survival advantage and higher frequency of active caspase-3-positive cells than CMs following overnight culture (figure 5B,C).
Figure 5

AtMs exhibited increased apoptosis potential, defective for proinflammatory cytokine production and impaired ability to co-stimulate T cells. (A) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated that the apoptotic execution phase pathway was enriched in lupus AtMs compared with CMs. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots and accumulated data showed the survival, apoptosis and necrosis rates of lupus AtMs and CMs cultured for 18–20 hours in vitro (n=6). (C) Flow cytometry analysis and accumulated data to show the differentially expressed active caspase-3 between AtMs and CMs from the same patients with SLE after incubated at 37°C for 20 hours (n=4). (D) Accumulated data showed the capacity of AtMs and CMs from active patients with SLE (n=20) to produce IL-6 and TNF-α. PBMCs were stimulated with PIB or PIB plus CpG for 5 hours and then the cytokines were detected by flow cytometry. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots (left) and accumulated data (right) showed the ability of AtMs and CMs to co-stimulate CD4+ T cells to proliferate in vitro (n=6). (F) Representative flow cytometry plots (left) and accumulated data (right) to show the survival rate of CMs and AtMs co-clutured with CD4+ T cells (n=6). Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by paired t test (B–D, F) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (E). AtMs, atypical memory B cells; CMs, classical memory B cells; NES, normalised enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate; PI, Propidium Iodide; ISO, isotype; PIB, PMA+Ionomycin+Brefeldin A; CpG, cytosine-phosphate-guanidine; CFSE, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

AtMs exhibited increased apoptosis potential, defective for proinflammatory cytokine production and impaired ability to co-stimulate T cells. (A) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated that the apoptotic execution phase pathway was enriched in lupus AtMs compared with CMs. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots and accumulated data showed the survival, apoptosis and necrosis rates of lupus AtMs and CMs cultured for 18–20 hours in vitro (n=6). (C) Flow cytometry analysis and accumulated data to show the differentially expressed active caspase-3 between AtMs and CMs from the same patients with SLE after incubated at 37°C for 20 hours (n=4). (D) Accumulated data showed the capacity of AtMs and CMs from active patients with SLE (n=20) to produce IL-6 and TNF-α. PBMCs were stimulated with PIB or PIB plus CpG for 5 hours and then the cytokines were detected by flow cytometry. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots (left) and accumulated data (right) showed the ability of AtMs and CMs to co-stimulate CD4+ T cells to proliferate in vitro (n=6). (F) Representative flow cytometry plots (left) and accumulated data (right) to show the survival rate of CMs and AtMs co-clutured with CD4+ T cells (n=6). Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by paired t test (B–D, F) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (E). AtMs, atypical memory B cells; CMs, classical memory B cells; NES, normalised enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate; PI, Propidium Iodide; ISO, isotype; PIB, PMA+Ionomycin+Brefeldin A; CpG, cytosine-phosphate-guanidine; CFSE, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus. The RNA-seq data showed that lupus AtMs expressed lower proinflammatory molecules IL6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) and higher anti-inflammatory molecules IL10 and Transforming Growth Factor Beta-1 (TGFB1) (online supplementary figure 7C). We found that lupus AtMs showed much reduced capacity to produce proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 and TNF-α following polyclonal stimulations (figure 5D and online supplementary figure 7D). B cells also play an active role in co-stimulating T cells.4 Compared with lupus CMs, AtMs exhibited a significantly decreased capacity to co-stimulate CD4+ T cells to proliferate, as checked by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) dilution (figure 5E), which was accompanied with a diminished survival of AtMs (figure 5F). These results suggest that lupus AtMs are apoptosis-prone, defective for proinflammatory cytokine production and poorly provide co-stimulatory signals to T cells under the current experimental conditions.

AtMs are heavily infiltrated into the kidneys of patients with LN

Finally we performed an in situ study of AtMs in renal tissues of patients with LN by multiplexed immunohistochemistry (figure 6A and online supplementary figure 8A). The renal tissues from patients with LN (detailed characteristics are in online supplementary table 5) showed a tendency of increased infiltration of CD20+ B cells compared with controls (online supplementary figure 8B). Interestingly, CD20+T-bet+ AtMs were abundantly detected in the renal tissues of patients with LN compared with controls for both frequency and density (figure 6B). Consistent with the data from peripheral AtMs, we observed that T-bet+ AtMs from renal tissues of patients with LN displayed significantly higher levels of phosphorylated S6(Ser235/236) than T-bet- B cells (figure 6C,D).
Figure 6

T bet+ AtMs infiltrated into the renal tissues of patients with lupus nephritis (LN). (A) Multiplexed IHC was applied to detect the CD20+T-bet+ AtMs in renal tissues of patients with LN. Peritumor renal tissue was used as control. (B) Comparison of the frequency (T-bet+ AtMs%B) and density of T-bet+ AtMs in renal tissues of LN (n=27) and peritumor renal tissues (n=10). (C) T-bet+ B cells showed higher expression of p-S6 than T-bet- B cells in renal tissues of patients with LN. (D) Comparison of the fluorescent intensity of p-S6 in 26 T-bet- and 26 T-bet+ B cells in renal tissues from three patients with LN. (E) Correlation between T-bet+ AtMs%B in renal tissues and AtMs%B in peripheral blood from the same patients with LN (n=9). (F) Patients with LN were divided into three groups based on renal SLEDAI Scores and the frequency of renal T-bet+ AtMs was compared among the three groups (n=17, 10, 6, respectively). (G) Comparison of the frequency of renal T-bet+ AtMs among different pathological types of patients with LN (type Ⅲ (n=3), type Ⅳ (n=7), type Ⅴ (n=4), type Ⅲ +Ⅴ (n=7) and type Ⅳ +Ⅴ (n=6)). Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by Mann-Whitney test (B and D), Spearman’s rank correlation (E) and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (F and G). AtMs, atypical memory B cells; AtMs%B, frequency of AtMs among total B cells; AU, arbitrary unit; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

T bet+ AtMs infiltrated into the renal tissues of patients with lupus nephritis (LN). (A) Multiplexed IHC was applied to detect the CD20+T-bet+ AtMs in renal tissues of patients with LN. Peritumor renal tissue was used as control. (B) Comparison of the frequency (T-bet+ AtMs%B) and density of T-bet+ AtMs in renal tissues of LN (n=27) and peritumor renal tissues (n=10). (C) T-bet+ B cells showed higher expression of p-S6 than T-bet- B cells in renal tissues of patients with LN. (D) Comparison of the fluorescent intensity of p-S6 in 26 T-bet- and 26 T-bet+ B cells in renal tissues from three patients with LN. (E) Correlation between T-bet+ AtMs%B in renal tissues and AtMs%B in peripheral blood from the same patients with LN (n=9). (F) Patients with LN were divided into three groups based on renal SLEDAI Scores and the frequency of renal T-bet+ AtMs was compared among the three groups (n=17, 10, 6, respectively). (G) Comparison of the frequency of renal T-bet+ AtMs among different pathological types of patients with LN (type Ⅲ (n=3), type Ⅳ (n=7), type Ⅴ (n=4), type Ⅲ +Ⅴ (n=7) and type Ⅳ +Ⅴ (n=6)). Error bars indicated mean±SEM. P values were determined by Mann-Whitney test (B and D), Spearman’s rank correlation (E) and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (F and G). AtMs, atypical memory B cells; AtMs%B, frequency of AtMs among total B cells; AU, arbitrary unit; IHC, immunohistochemistry. The frequency of AtMs in renal tissues was positively correlated with that in peripheral blood (figure 6E), suggesting that peripheral AtMs frequency may predict the degree of renal AtMs infiltrations. Furthermore, the frequency of renal AtMs was significantly higher in a group with high renal SLEDAI Scores (12~16) than the group with low renal SLEDAI Scores (0~4) (figure 6F). When different pathological types were taken into consideration, type IV LN showed a significantly higher frequency of renal AtMs than that of type III+V (figure 6G). Moreover, the density of renal AtMs was positively correlated with SLEDAI Scores, serum anti-dsDNA titres, urine proteins and renal function indicators while negatively correlated with serum C3 and albumin levels (online supplementary figure 8C,D). These results clearly demonstrated that the degree of renal AtM infiltration is closely associated with disease activity and renal dysfunction, hinting that infiltrated AtMs may directly play a pathogenic role in situ.

Discussion

The identification of AtMs with a phenotype of CD19hiCD21lo/ − in lupus can be dated back to 2002.9 Since then, a series of studies have reported phenotypically similar B cells to be expanded in patients with lupus.5 8–11 17 23 33 By integrating phenotypical, molecular, functional and histological approaches, the current study adds new evidence that AtMs are abnormally differentiated with metabolic and functional dysregulation, and associated with disease activity. Particularly, we have identified that the mTORC1 pathway is highly activated in lupus AtMs and potentially involved in their generation and terminal differentiation. In mice, it has been shown that ABCs (murine AtMs) arose from follicular B cells18 and a lot of factors contributed to their generation, including TLR7, IFN-γ, BCR, IL-21, CD40 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II molecules.19 20 23 24 Similarly, studies in humans also implicated TLR7/TLR9, IFN-γ and IL-21 in the generation of T-bet+ AtMs-like B cells.17 23 33 However, to our understanding, the key signalling pathway leading to their generation has not been unveiled. Interestingly, we identified that the mTORC1 pathway was particularly elevated in human lupus AtMs and blocking this pathway inhibited the differentiation of T-bet+ AtMs-like B cells. Furthermore, the mTORC1 pathway is known to be critical for plasma cell differentiation and antibody production.43 We confirmed this point by showing that rapamycin strongly decreased the antibody secretion from stimulated lupus AtMs. Given the promising results from a few clinical trials to use rapamycin (sirolimus) to treat patients with lupus,44 45 our current study hints that some effect of rapamycin could be via inhibiting the generation and terminal differentiation of AtMs. AtMs expressing a panel of dysfunctional/inhibitory markers have been reported in HIV12 and malaria27 infections, as well as in patients with lupus.17 33 We extended these studies by demonstrating that lupus AtMs expressed dysfunctional markers, and shared a TF profile similar to dysfunctional T cells.37 38 Interestingly, lupus AtMs also upregulate the two metabolism-related TFs HIF1α and c-Myc,41 42 which may be linked with the upstream mTORC1 activation and general metabolic aberrations, raising an important question to be addressed in future study. There is some inconsistence about the capacity of AtMs to undergo terminal differentiation. Several studies have shown the compromised capacity of AtMs to undergo terminal differenation12 27 34 and we obtained similar results. By contrast, in one lupus study, following the stimulation of TLR7/IL-21/IL-10, although lupus AtMs did show a proliferation defect compared with CMs, they produced comparable amount of IgG on a per cell basis.33 Using activated T cells as the stimulus, Wang et al found similar frequencies of antibody-secreting cells and IgG secretion from lupus AtMs and CMs.17 While the difference from the above studies can be ascribed to the different experimental conditions, it should be mentioned that lupus AtMs are in a paradoxically differentiated status: AtMs express high levels of both B cell identity genes SPI1, MEF2C, PAX5 and BCL6, as well as plasma cell-driving genes IRF4, XBP1 and SLAMF7. Our tentative explanation is that AtMs are in fact dragged by two opposing differentiation forces. Most likely AtMs are not essentially poised to plasma cell differentiation themselves, however, they may be efficiently mobilised into plasma cell pool under certain pathogenic conditions like lupus flare. Our and other studies have shown that lupus AtMs are highly enriched with antinuclear autoantibodies, including Sm, Nucleosome and Chromatin.8 16 17 19 It’s interesting to ask how these pathogenic antibodies are generated and diversified in vivo. The isotype non-switched lupus AtMs (named activated naive B cells) showed higher IgM mutation rates than those of naïve B cells,46 indicating that a mechanism of antibody mutation is working for non-switched AtMs. For switched AtMs, the IgG mutation rates were lower than those of switched memory B cells from the same patients with lupus.33 Together with lower expressions of CXCR4 and CXCR5 on AtMs, the above evidence suggests that AtMs are a population of extrafollicular B cells independent of germinal centre origin. Intriguingly, we found that lupus AtMs express high levels of AICDA, which encodes activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a molecule critical for somatic mutation and immunoglobulin isotype switching.47 We propose that AtMs are uniquely differentiated from a population of self-reactive naïve B cells48 in the context of chronic stimulation. High expression of PAX5 and BCL6 will ensure B cell identity in order for AID to perform its function and generate autoantibodies with sufficient affinity. In the context of disease flare, lupus AtMs could be abundantly expanded and mobilised into plasma cells to produce high levels of pathogenic autoantibodies. In summary, the current study reveals new molecular and functional features of lupus AtMs. Particularly, as mTORC1 is required for both the generation and the terminal differentiation of AtMs, targeting mTORC1 pathway may represent an alternative strategy to the current lupus therapies, especially for those patients refractory to conventional regimens.

Methods

Details of methods are available in online supplementary materials section.
  48 in total

1.  Expansion of CD19(hi)CD21(lo/neg) B cells in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients with autoimmune cytopenia.

Authors:  Klaus Warnatz; Claudia Wehr; Ruth Dräger; Sigune Schmidt; Hermann Eibel; Michael Schlesier; Hans-Hartmut Peter
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.144

2.  Stat1-dependent synergistic activation of T-bet for IgG2a production during early stage of B cell activation.

Authors:  Weifeng Xu; J Jillian Zhang
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A new population of cells lacking expression of CD27 represents a notable component of the B cell memory compartment in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Chungwen Wei; Jennifer Anolik; Amedeo Cappione; Bo Zheng; Aimee Pugh-Bernard; James Brooks; Eun-Hyung Lee; Eric C B Milner; Iñaki Sanz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection.

Authors:  E John Wherry; Sang-Jun Ha; Susan M Kaech; W Nicholas Haining; Surojit Sarkar; Vandana Kalia; Shruti Subramaniam; Joseph N Blattman; Daniel L Barber; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  A new CD21low B cell population in the peripheral blood of patients with SLE.

Authors:  Claudia Wehr; Hermann Eibel; Madhan Masilamani; Harald Illges; Michael Schlesier; Hans-Hartmut Peter; Klaus Warnatz
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  A novel subset of memory B cells is enriched in autoreactivity and correlates with adverse outcomes in SLE.

Authors:  Matilda W Nicholas; Mary Anne Dooley; Susan L Hogan; Jennifer Anolik; John Looney; Ingnacio Sanz; Stephen H Clarke
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Activated memory B cell subsets correlate with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: delineation by expression of CD27, IgD, and CD95.

Authors:  Annett M Jacobi; Karin Reiter; Meggan Mackay; Cynthia Aranow; Falk Hiepe; Andreas Radbruch; Arne Hansen; Gerd-R Burmester; Betty Diamond; Peter E Lipsky; Thomas Dörner
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-06

9.  Rapamycin reduces disease activity and normalizes T cell activation-induced calcium fluxing in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  David Fernandez; Eduardo Bonilla; Naureen Mirza; Brian Niland; Andras Perl
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-09

10.  Defective B cell tolerance checkpoints in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Sergey Yurasov; Hedda Wardemann; Johanna Hammersen; Makoto Tsuiji; Eric Meffre; Virginia Pascual; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  20 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy and safety of sirolimus in systemic lupus erythematosus: a real-world study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liying Peng; Chanyuan Wu; Ruping Hong; Yiduo Sun; Junyan Qian; Jiuliang Zhao; Qian Wang; Xinping Tian; Yanhong Wang; Mengtao Li; Xiaofeng Zeng
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Determinants of B-Cell Compartment Hyperactivation in European Adolescents Living With Perinatally Acquired HIV-1 After Over 10 Years of Suppressive Therapy.

Authors:  Alessandra Ruggiero; Giuseppe Rubens Pascucci; Nicola Cotugno; Sara Domínguez-Rodríguez; Stefano Rinaldi; Alfredo Tagarro; Pablo Rojo; Caroline Foster; Alasdair Bamford; Anita De Rossi; Eleni Nastouli; Nigel Klein; Elena Morrocchi; Benoit Fatou; Kinga K Smolen; Al Ozonoff; Michela Di Pastena; Katherine Luzuriaga; Hanno Steen; Carlo Giaquinto; Philip Goulder; Paolo Rossi; Ofer Levy; Savita Pahwa; Paolo Palma
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Double Negative B Cell Is Associated With Renal Impairment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Acts as a Marker for Nephritis Remission.

Authors:  Xujie You; Ruijun Zhang; Miao Shao; Jing He; Jiali Chen; Jiajia Liu; Xia Zhang; Xu Liu; Rulin Jia; Xiaolin Sun; Zhanguo Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Lupus B Cell Biology: PI3K, IFNγ, and Chromatin.

Authors:  Maria A Bacalao; Anne B Satterthwaite
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Enhanced Fatty Acid Synthesis Leads to Subset Imbalance and IFN-γ Overproduction in T Helper 1 Cells.

Authors:  Shigeru Iwata; Mingzeng Zhang; He Hao; Gulzhan Trimova; Maiko Hajime; Yusuke Miyazaki; Naoaki Ohkubo; Yurie Satoh Kanda; Yasuyuki Todoroki; Hiroko Miyata; Masanobu Ueno; Atsushi Nagayasu; Shingo Nakayamada; Kei Sakata; Yoshiya Tanaka
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  HIV-1 Tat Activates Akt/mTORC1 Pathway and AICDA Expression by Downregulating Its Transcriptional Inhibitors in B Cells.

Authors:  Burkitkan Akbay; Diego Germini; Amangeldy K Bissenbaev; Yana R Musinova; Evgeny V Sheval; Yegor Vassetzky; Svetlana Dokudovskaya
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The expansion of activated naive DNA autoreactive B cells and its association with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Authors:  Kittikorn Wangriatisak; Chokchai Thanadetsuntorn; Thamonwan Krittayapoositpot; Chaniya Leepiyasakulchai; Thanitta Suangtamai; Pintip Ngamjanyaporn; Ladawan Khowawisetsut; Prasong Khaenam; Chavachol Setthaudom; Prapaporn Pisitkun; Patchanee Chootong
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 8.  B Cell Abnormalities in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis-Role in Pathogenesis and Effect of Immunosuppressive Treatments.

Authors:  Desmond Y H Yap; Tak Mao Chan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Multiple Functions of B Cells in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Kongyang Ma; Wenhan Du; Xiaohui Wang; Shiwen Yuan; Xiaoyan Cai; Dongzhou Liu; Jingyi Li; Liwei Lu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The Antigen Presenting Potential of CD21low B Cells.

Authors:  Marlene E Reincke; Kathryn J Payne; Ina Harder; Valentina Strohmeier; Reinhard E Voll; Klaus Warnatz; Baerbel Keller
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.