Literature DB >> 31142116

Penetration and Accumulation of Dendrons with Different Peripheral Composition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

René T Rozenbaum1, Oliver C J Andrén2, Henny C van der Mei1, Willem Woudstra1, Henk J Busscher1, Michael Malkoch2, Prashant K Sharma1.   

Abstract

Multidrug resistant bacterial infections threaten to become the number one cause of death by the year 2050. Development of antimicrobial dendritic polymers is considered promising as an alternative infection control strategy. For antimicrobial dendritic polymers to effectively kill bacteria residing in infectious biofilms, they have to penetrate and accumulate deep into biofilms. Biofilms are often recalcitrant to antimicrobial penetration and accumulation. Therefore, this work aims to determine the role of compact dendrons with different peripheral composition in their penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Red fluorescently labeled dendrons with pH-responsive NH3+ peripheral groups initially penetrated faster from a buffer suspension at pH 7.0 into the acidic environment of P. aeruginosa biofilms than dendrons with OH or COO- groups at their periphery. In addition, dendrons with NH3+ peripheral groups accumulated near the top of the biofilm due to electrostatic double-layer attraction with negatively charged biofilm components. However, accumulation of dendrons with OH and COO- peripheral groups was more evenly distributed across the depth of the biofilms than NH3+ composed dendrons and exceeded accumulation of NH3+ composed dendrons after 10 min of exposure. Unlike dendrons with NH3+ groups at their periphery, dendrons with OH or COO- peripheral groups, lacking strong electrostatic double-layer attraction with biofilm components, were largely washed-out during exposure to PBS without dendrons. Thus, penetration and accumulation of dendrons into biofilms is controlled by their peripheral composition through electrostatic double-layer interactions, which is an important finding for the further development of new antimicrobial or antimicrobial-carrying dendritic polymers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nanomedicine; dendrimers; dendritic polymers; nanocarriers; nanotechnology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31142116      PMCID: PMC6628176          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


Biofilms are three-dimensional microbial aggregates responsible for 60–80% of all microbial infections.[1] In an infectious biofilm, infecting organisms are protected by a matrix of self-produced extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), impeding effective penetration of most antimicrobials.[2] This protection mechanism was already observed in 1684 by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, describing how the vinegar which he used to wash his teeth only killed those bacteria which were on the outside of the scurf,[3] nowadays called “biofilm”. To date, with the threat of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infection becoming the number one cause of death by the year 2050,[4] effective penetration of antimicrobials into biofilms is still a major hurdle in the treatment of infectious biofilms. Dendritic polymers with dendrimers as the flagship are flawless and symmetrically branched macromolecules with a treelike structure.[5] When composed of antimicrobial peptides,[6,7] such dendrimers are able to kill planktonic bacteria,[6] that is, suspended bacteria that are not in their protected, adhering, biofilm-mode of growth. Also antimicrobial dendrimers can prevent biofilm formation.[7] For the treatment of existing infectious biofilms, dendrimers are under investigation for use as an antimicrobial nanocarrier.[5] Vancomycin-tethered poly(amidoamine) dendrimers showed avid binding to vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surfaces.[8] However, it is unclear whether the peripheral composition of dendritic nanocarriers stimulating avid binding to biofilm inhabitants is favorable or not for their deep penetration into an infectious biofilm. Dendrons are wedge-shaped structures that are the major component of dendrimers.[9] These dendritic frameworks are inherently bifunctional containing one chemically addressable group designated to the focal point and a composition of multiple peripheral groups. Higher generation dendrons are by definition dendrimers with an active core and therewith the chemical composition of larger dendrons, similar to dendrimers, is responsible for efficient penetration in infectious biofilms. Considering the importance of penetration and accumulation of antimicrobials into an infectious biofilm and the promise of dendrimer-based antimicrobials for infection control, this work aims to determine the role of dendron peripheral composition in their penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. P. aeruginosa causes a range of infections across the human body[10] and is known to produce extensive amounts of EPS that can be especially troublesome in cystic fibrosis patients.[2] Better understanding of the role of peripheral composition of dendrons in their penetration and accumulation into biofilm will aid their further development as an effective antimicrobial. To this end, bifunctional dendrons were designed, consisting of rhodamine B as a red-fluorescent marker, an unsymmetrical triethylene glycol (TEG) linker, and three-generations (G3), multivalent 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propionic acid (bis-MPA) dendrons. Bis-MPA dendrons are biocompatible[11] and biodegradable[12] and can be synthesized with unprecedented structural control.[13] Three different dendrons with pH-responsive peripheral composition were synthesized (see Figure a): rhodamine-TEG-G3-OH, rhodamine-TEG-G3-COO–, and rhodamine-TEG-G3-NH3+ (charges indicated are as in the acidic environment inside a biofilm). Dendrons were constructed using conventional divergent growth of bis-MPA.[14,15] Rhodamine B was covalently attached through fluoride-promoted esterification (FPE) chemistry and the peripheral hydroxyls were activated yielding the neutral dendritic scaffold, rhodamine-TEG-G3-OH. Esterification of rhodamine-TEG-G3-OH yielded anionic rhodamine-TEG-G3-COO– and cationic rhodamine-TEG-G3-NH3+ (see Supporting Information for details).[14−16] Complete substitution and high structural purity were corroborated using conventional characterization techniques for dendrimer chemistry, that is, NMR (Figure b) and MALDI-TOF-MS (Figure c).
Figure 1

(a) Bifunctional dendrons displaying different pH-responsive peripheral composition, consisting of fluorescent marker (rhodamine B), an unsymmetrical TEG linker, and three generations (G3), multivalent bis-MPA dendrons. Charges indicated are as in the acidic environment of a biofilm. (b) 1H NMR of TEG-G3-OH, rhodamine-TEG-G3-COO–, and rhodamine-TEG-G3-NH3+. 1H NMR analyses were performed as described previously,[15] using a Brüker AM NMR (Brüker Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany). (c) MALDI-TOF-MS of rhodamine-TEG-G3-OH, rhodamine-TEG-G3-COO–, and rhodamine-TEG-G3-NH3+. MALDI-TOF spectra were obtained as described previously,[15] using a Brüker UltraFlex MALDI-TOF MS with SCOUT-MTP Ion Source (Brüker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), a gridless ion source with the nitrogen-laser (337 nm) and a reflector. .

(a) Bifunctional dendrons displaying different pH-responsive peripheral composition, consisting of fluorescent marker (rhodamine B), an unsymmetrical TEG linker, and three generations (G3), multivalent bis-MPA dendrons. Charges indicated are as in the acidic environment of a biofilm. (b) 1H NMR of TEG-G3-OH, rhodamine-TEG-G3-COO–, and rhodamine-TEG-G3-NH3+. 1H NMR analyses were performed as described previously,[15] using a Brüker AM NMR (Brüker Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany). (c) MALDI-TOF-MS of rhodamine-TEG-G3-OH, rhodamine-TEG-G3-COO–, and rhodamine-TEG-G3-NH3+. MALDI-TOF spectra were obtained as described previously,[15] using a Brüker UltraFlex MALDI-TOF MS with SCOUT-MTP Ion Source (Brüker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), a gridless ion source with the nitrogen-laser (337 nm) and a reflector. . Next, P. aeruginosa ATCC 39324 biofilms were grown in a constant depth film fermenter (CDFF)[17] to a thickness of 100 μm, as verified using optical coherence tomography (OCT result: 96 ± 15 μm, averaged across all biofilms employed in this study). Biofilms were exposed to red-fluorescently labeled dendron suspensions for 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 min to study their penetration. In addition, biofilms after 100 min of exposure to a dendron suspension in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.0) were subsequently placed in PBS without dendrons for another 100 min to monitor dendron wash-out. Note that in a separate experiment (data not shown), it was established that dendrons did not inadvertently release covalently coupled rhodamine in buffer, regardless of pH. After penetration and/or wash-out, biofilms were immediately embedded into Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen after which 10 μm sections were made perpendicular to the biofilm surface using a cryotome (Leica CM3050 S, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) for fluorescence microscopy. Figure a,b shows examples of cross-sectional images of biofilms after exposure to the different dendron suspensions at different time points. Rhodamine on its own fully penetrated in the biofilms (see Figure S1). Because all dendrons were synthesized to possess a single fluorescent rhodamine group, dendron distribution across the depth of the biofilms could be derived from the depth-dependent fluorescence intensity (Figure c,d) in the biofilm image, using a standard curve prepared using suspensions with known dendron concentrations (see Figure S2).
Figure 2

(a) Cross-sectional images of P. aeruginosa biofilms exposed to 0.2 μM dendron suspensions in PBS with different peripheral composition for 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 min and after 100 min wash-out in PBS (initial exposure time to dendron suspensions: 100 min). Identical alignment of the biofilms after embedding and cryo-sectioning was impossible, hence each fluorescence image is complemented with a light-microscopic image to visualize the entire biofilm (grasped within two arrows in the second image from the left, top row). The white scale bar represents 100 μm. (b) Enlarged overlayer of fluorescence and light-micrographs of dendrons accumulated in a biofilm. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (c) A custom LabVIEW script was used to calculate the fluorescence intensity in a 10 × 0.645 μm (corresponding with one pixel) biofilm column as a function of biofilm depth (see also Experimental Section). (d) Example of fluorescence intensity as a function of biofilm depth, calculated as described in panel c, from which the depth-dependent dendron concentration was derived, using a standard curve (Figure S2).

(a) Cross-sectional images of P. aeruginosa biofilms exposed to 0.2 μM dendron suspensions in PBS with different peripheral composition for 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 min and after 100 min wash-out in PBS (initial exposure time to dendron suspensions: 100 min). Identical alignment of the biofilms after embedding and cryo-sectioning was impossible, hence each fluorescence image is complemented with a light-microscopic image to visualize the entire biofilm (grasped within two arrows in the second image from the left, top row). The white scale bar represents 100 μm. (b) Enlarged overlayer of fluorescence and light-micrographs of dendrons accumulated in a biofilm. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (c) A custom LabVIEW script was used to calculate the fluorescence intensity in a 10 × 0.645 μm (corresponding with one pixel) biofilm column as a function of biofilm depth (see also Experimental Section). (d) Example of fluorescence intensity as a function of biofilm depth, calculated as described in panel c, from which the depth-dependent dendron concentration was derived, using a standard curve (Figure S2). Dendrons with NH3+ groups at their periphery accumulated faster into the acidic environment of P. aeruginosa biofilms than dendrons with OH or COO– at their periphery (Figure a,b), mostly accumulating near the top of the biofilms. Although initially penetrating less than dendrons with NH3+ groups at their periphery, after 10 min exposure the accumulation of dendrons with OH and COO– peripheral groups exceeded accumulation of dendrons with NH3+ peripheral groups in layers deeper than 30–40 μm into the biofilm (Figure c,d). Distribution of dendrons with OH and COO– peripheral groups was more even across the depth of the biofilms than of dendrons with NH3+ groups at their periphery. Importantly, neither the distribution (Figure e) nor the total concentration (Figure f) of dendrons with NH3+ groups at their periphery was affected by exposure to PBS, whereas dendrons with OH or COO– peripheral groups were largely washed-out during exposure to PBS.
Figure 3

(a–d) Concentration of dendrons with different peripheral composition as a function of P. aeruginosa biofilm depth after exposure of biofilms to 0.2 μM dendron suspensions in PBS for 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 min (note black and blue data may be overlapping). (e) Concentration of dendrons in P. aeruginosa biofilms after 100 min exposure to a dendron suspension in PBS, followed by wash-out in PBS without dendrons for 100 min (note black and blue data are overlapping). (f) Total concentration of dendrons in P. aeruginosa biofilms after 100 min exposure to dendron suspensions and after subsequent wash-out for 100 min. Error bars denote standard deviations over six different biofilms, taken from different pans in three separate CDFF runs. Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.05; ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc analysis) between dendron periphery compositions: *, NH3+ versus COO– and OH; #, COO– versus OH.

(a–d) Concentration of dendrons with different peripheral composition as a function of P. aeruginosa biofilm depth after exposure of biofilms to 0.2 μM dendron suspensions in PBS for 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 min (note black and blue data may be overlapping). (e) Concentration of dendrons in P. aeruginosa biofilms after 100 min exposure to a dendron suspension in PBS, followed by wash-out in PBS without dendrons for 100 min (note black and blue data are overlapping). (f) Total concentration of dendrons in P. aeruginosa biofilms after 100 min exposure to dendron suspensions and after subsequent wash-out for 100 min. Error bars denote standard deviations over six different biofilms, taken from different pans in three separate CDFF runs. Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.05; ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc analysis) between dendron periphery compositions: *, NH3+ versus COO– and OH; #, COO– versus OH. Penetration and accumulation of antimicrobials, including antimicrobials transported by nanocarriers such as dendrimers, is a conditio sine qua non for effective bacterial killing in infectious biofilms. Most studies on antimicrobial nanoparticle penetration and accumulation in biofilms have focused on the effects of charge, but outcomes are indecisive. Negatively charged nanoparticles are generally said to penetrate more easily into biofilms[18−21] but oppositely also positively charged particles have been described to penetrate better into biofilms.[22] Penetration depends on (1) the availability of transportation channels in biofilms with sufficient width to allow nanocarrier passage, (2) diffusion coefficients of the nanocarriers depending on their configuration and composition, and (3) their interaction with the channel walls, that is, the EPS matrix or bacterial cell surfaces. Dendrons are extremely small in the order of 2–5 nm,[23] whereas water channel widths in biofilms are likely minimally 10-fold larger.[5] Thus, size differences between the dendrons applied and thus their diffusion coefficients can be excluded as being causative to the difference in penetration and accumulation observed between the three different dendrons. Unfortunately, their small size did not allow reliable measurement of their zeta potentials; however, based on their pH-responsive peripheral composition it can be assumed that within an acidic P. aeruginosa biofilm (pH around 6.5[24,25]) NH3+ groups (pKa around 9) will be protonated and positively charged, whereas COO– groups (pKa around 2) are deprotonated and negatively charged. The OH groups will remain uncharged inside P. aeruginosa biofilms. At the same time, EPS components[26,27] and bacterial cell surfaces, including Pseudomonas ones,[28] remain negatively charged around pH 6.5. Thus, the accumulation of NH3+ dendrons near the top of a biofilm can be explained by strong, electrostatic double-layer mediated adhesion of dendrons, impeding their penetration to deeper biofilm layers. The OH and negatively charged COOdendrons will migrate deeper into the biofilms, as they experience no electrostatic double-layer attraction with the channel walls and utmost weak Lifshitz-van der Waals attraction. Therewith the deeper penetration of neutral and negatively charged particles goes at the expense of being easily washed-out, an aspect frequently neglected in the current literature. We here show that prevention of dendron wash-out critically depends on their peripheral composition, that is, positive charged groups. Carefully engineered chemistries of biomaterials or drug carriers, including antimicrobial nanocarriers, can become compromised when applied in the human body through interaction with components in the blood, mucus, and extracellular matrix of human tissue. Because the current study was designed to provide basic knowledge about the interaction of dendrons with biofilm rather than demonstrate in vivo performance, experiments were done in a buffer. In a protein rich environment, proteins will adsorb on dendrons depending on their peripheral composition,[29] form a corona within 30 s, increase their hydrodynamic diameter, and make dendron zeta potentials less negative.[29] Yet,[22] surface-engineered nanoparticles possess the ability to permeate into cells,[30] tumors,[31] and pass the blood–brain barrier.[32] Smart micellar nanoparticles with adaptive, pH-responsive engineered surfaces maintained their surface-engineered properties to penetrate and accumulate in biofilms in vivo after transport through the blood.[22,33−38] This suggests maintenance of surface-engineered nanoparticle properties when applied under in vivo conditions. For more macroscopic biomaterials, it has been suggested[39] in the past that proteins adsorbed and adjusted their conformation in a way that is maintained to reflect the chemistry of the underlying material; however, whether such an argument is valid to explain the abilities of engineered nanoparticles in vivo remains to be demonstrated. In conclusion, penetration and accumulation of dendrons into biofilms is controlled by their pH-responsive peripheral composition. This conclusion offers better understanding of interactions between dendrimers and biofilm components during penetration and accumulation that is important for the development of new antimicrobial dendritic nanocarriers but in addition also offers the perspective of controlling the accumulation depth of dendrimers inside a biofilm. Although the dendrons in this study were labeled with rhodamine as a tool to measure their penetration, rhodamine can easily be replaced with more therapeutically potent antimicrobials. Most antibiotics have a similar size as rhodamine and can be coupled to the focal point of the dendron, alike the rhodamine, through a hydrolyzable ester or disulfide bond, provided the antibiotics have a similar hydrophobicity. Subsequently, the dendron can control the penetration and accumulation into a biofilm according to its peripheral composition. Together with their good biocompatibility,[11] biodegradability,[12] and commercial availability, that is, often the biggest obstacle in downward clinical translation,[40] this warrants future exploitation of these dendrimers, as a new antimicrobial strategy for infection control.

Experimental Section

Bacterial Strain, Growth Conditions, and Harvesting

P. aeruginosa ATCC 39324, an isolate from a cystic fibrosis patient, was grown aerobically for 24 h at 37 °C on a blood agar plate from a frozen stock and stored at 4 °C until use. One single colony was added to 10 mL of tryptone soya broth (TSB, Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) and grown for 24 h at 37 °C after which the broth was added to 200 mL of TSB and incubated 16 h under rotary shaking at 150 rpm (37 °C). Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 5000g, after which the bacterial pellet was washed two times with PBS (PBS, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.0). Bacteria were suspended in 200 mL TSB at a concentration of 5 × 107 bacteria per mL, as determined using a Bürker-Türk counting chamber.

Biofilm Growth in the Constant Depth Film Fermenter

Biofilms were grown on stainless steel disks in the constant depth film fermenter (CDFF).[17] Sterile stainless steel disks (diameter 5 mm) were placed in a pan, equipped with five wells with adjustable depth to house five disks. Fifteen pans were placed in the turntable of the CDFF. The well-depth was set to allow growth of 100 μm thick biofilms with the aid of a scraper blade passing over each pan during rotation of the turntable at 3 rpm and maintaining the temperature inside the CDFF at 37 °C. For inoculation of the disks in the CDFF, 200 mL of bacterial suspension was dripped during 1 h on top of the pans, housing the disks. The turntable was stopped from revolving for 30 min, allowing the bacteria to adhere to the stainless steel disks, after which rotation was continued and artificial sputum medium[41] was dropwise added at a flow rate of 16 mL h–1 on top of the pans and scraped across. After 18 h of biofilm growth, disks with adhering biofilms were aseptically taken out of the pans. One CDFF run was comprised of 75 disks, from each run 15 randomly selected disk were taken from different pans for optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis, and 30 biofilms were selected for dendron penetration experiments.

Optical Coherence Tomography

The thickness of biofilms was determined using OCT (Thorlabs Ganymade-II, Newton, NJ, U.S.A.). Biofilms were submerged in PBS, and three-dimensional scans of the complete biofilm were taken. OCT images were processed using a custom-made LabVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX, U.S.A.) script, which was corrected for background noise and possible tilting of the stainless steel disk surface. The average biofilm thickness was calculated using Otsu-thresholding of the image to determine the border between biofilm and surrounding fluid.[42]

Dendron Penetration in Biofilms and Cryo-Sectioning of Biofilms

Dendrons were suspended to a concentration of 0.2 μM in PBS and 20 μL of a dendron suspension was pipetted over a biofilm surface. Dendron suspensions were spread evenly over the entire surface of the biofilm. Biofilms were exposed to dendron suspensions for 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 min, after which the biofilms were dip-washed in PBS. In addition, biofilms exposed for 100 min to a suspension of dendrons in PBS were transferred to PBS without dendrons for another 100 min to monitor dendron wash-out. Directly after washing, biofilms were embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek Europe B.V., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Next, biofilms were detached from their stainless-steel substratum for full embedding in Tissue-Tek and flash-freezing after which samples were stored in −80 °C until usage. Biofilms were cut in 10 μm thick sections using a cryotome (Leica CM3050 S, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) operating at −20 °C. Sections were collected on Menzel-Gläser superfrost slides (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) and kept in the dark until imaging, which was performed on the same day.

Fluorescent Imaging and Quantification of Dendron Penetration and Accumulation

Fluorescence microscopy (Leica DM 4000 B, Leica Microsystems Heidelberg Gmbh, Heidelberg, Germany) was carried out to image the biofilm sections. Fluorescence images were analyzed using a custom-built LabVIEW script to obtain the red-fluorescence intensity along the biofilm depth (see Figure c). The LabVIEW script first divided the biofilm image in vertical columns of 0.645 μm width (covering 1 pixel). Then, it aligned all the vertical columns with their tops along a straight line, after which the script calculated the average intensity profile as a function of biofilm depth. The dendron concentration in the biofilm was derived from the fluorescence intensity with a standard curve (Figure S2).
  36 in total

1.  Bacterial factors influencing adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains to a poly(ethylene oxide) brush.

Authors:  Astrid Roosjen; Henk J Busscher; Willem Norde; Henny C van der Mei
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 2.  Simplifying the synthesis of dendrimers: accelerated approaches.

Authors:  Marie V Walter; Michael Malkoch
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology.

Authors:  Stefan Tenzer; Dominic Docter; Jörg Kuharev; Anna Musyanovych; Verena Fetz; Rouven Hecht; Florian Schlenk; Dagmar Fischer; Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi; Christoph Reinhardt; Katharina Landfester; Hansjörg Schild; Michael Maskos; Shirley K Knauer; Roland H Stauber
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Nanoparticle size and surface charge determine effects of PAMAM dendrimers on human platelets in vitro.

Authors:  Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Anil K Patri; Jan Simak; Jennifer B Hall; Jana Semberova; Silvia H De Paoli Lacerda; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Application of a pH-sensitive fluoroprobe (C-SNARF-4) for pH microenvironment analysis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Ryan C Hunter; Terry J Beveridge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Fluoride-promoted esterification with imidazolide-activated compounds: a modular and sustainable approach to dendrimers.

Authors:  Sandra García-Gallego; Daniel Hult; Johan V Olsson; Michael Malkoch
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Extracellular DNA shields against aminoglycosides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Chiang; Martin Nilsson; Peter Østrup Jensen; Niels Høiby; Thomas E Nielsen; Michael Givskov; Tim Tolker-Nielsen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Inhibition of tobramycin diffusion by binding to alginate.

Authors:  W W Nichols; S M Dorrington; M P Slack; H L Walmsley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  New methodologies in the construction of dendritic materials.

Authors:  Anna Carlmark; Craig Hawker; Anders Hult; Michael Malkoch
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 10.  A Trans-Atlantic Perspective on Stagnation in Clinical Translation of Antimicrobial Strategies for the Control of Biomaterial-Implant-Associated Infection.

Authors:  Henk J Busscher; Volker Alt; Henny C van der Mei; Paul H Fagette; Werner Zimmerli; T Fintan Moriarty; Javad Parvizi; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Michael J Raschke; Thorsten Gehrke; Roger Bayston; Larry M Baddour; Lynn C Winterton; Rabih O Darouiche; David W Grainger
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2018-12-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  Surface charge modulation of rifampicin-loaded PLA nanoparticles to improve antibiotic delivery in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  David Da Costa; Chloé Exbrayat-Héritier; Basile Rambaud; Simon Megy; Raphaël Terreux; Bernard Verrier; Charlotte Primard
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 2.  Peptides and Dendrimers: How to Combat Viral and Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Annarita Falanga; Valentina Del Genio; Stefania Galdiero
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 3.  Recent advances in mechanical force-responsive drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Panqin Ma; Xiyu Lai; Zheng Luo; Ying Chen; Xian Jun Loh; Enyi Ye; Zibiao Li; Caisheng Wu; Yun-Long Wu
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 4.  Recent Advances of Degradation Technologies Based on PROTAC Mechanism.

Authors:  Mingchao Xiao; Jiaojiao Zhao; Qiang Wang; Jia Liu; Leina Ma
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-09-07

Review 5.  Biofilms in Surgical Site Infections: Recent Advances and Novel Prevention and Eradication Strategies.

Authors:  Andriy Hrynyshyn; Manuel Simões; Anabela Borges
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07

Review 6.  The Two Weapons against Bacterial Biofilms: Detection and Treatment.

Authors:  Adriana Cruz; Manuel Condinho; Beatriz Carvalho; Cecília M Arraiano; Vânia Pobre; Sandra N Pinto
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.