Thomas J Povsic1, E Magnus Ohman1, Matthew T Roe1, Jennifer White1, Frank W Rockhold1, Gilles Montalescot2, Jan H Cornel3, Jose C Nicolau4, P Gabriel Steg5,6, Stefan James7, Christoph Bode8, Robert C Welsh9, Alexei N Plotnikov10, Hardi Mundl11, C Michael Gibson12. 1. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, Institut de Cardiologie, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France. 3. Department of Cardiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar and Dutch Network for Cardiovascular Research, the Netherlands. 4. Insituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 5. DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, AP-HP and Inserm U-1148, Paris, France. 6. National Heart and Lung Institute Royal Brompton Hospital, Imperial College, London, England. 7. Department of Medical Sciences and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 8. University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Internal Medicine III, Freiburg, Germany. 9. Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 10. Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, New Jersey. 11. Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany. 12. PERFUSE Study Group, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Physician behavior in response to knowledge of a patient's CYP2C19 clopidogrel metabolizer status is unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of mandatory reporting of CYP2C19 pharmacogenomic testing, provided to investigators with no direct recommendations on how to use these results, with changes in P2Y12 inhibitor use, particularly clopidogrel, in the Randomized Trial to Compare the Safety of Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin in Addition to Either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome (GEMINI-ACS-1) clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The GEMINI-ACS-1 trial compared rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice daily, with aspirin, 100 mg daily, plus open-label clopidogrel or ticagrelor (provided), in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The trial included 371 clinical centers in 21 countries and 3037 patients with ACS. Data were analyzed between May 2017 and February 2019. Interventions: Investigators were required to prestipulate their planned response to CYP2C19 metabolizer status. In response to a regulatory mandate, results for all patients were reported to investigators approximately 1 week after randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reasons for switching P2Y12 inhibitors and occurrence of bleeding and ischemic events were collected. Results: Of 3037 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [9.0] years; 2275 men [74.9%], and 2824 white race/ethnicity [93.0%]), investigators initially treated 1704 (56.1%) with ticagrelor and 1333 (43.9%) with clopidogrel. Investigators prestipulated that they would use CYP2C19 metabolizer status to change P2Y12 inhibitor in 48.5% of genotyped clopidogrel-treated patients (n = 642 of 1324) and 5.5% of genotyped ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 93 of 1692). P2Y12 inhibitor switching for any reason occurred in 197 patients and was more common in patients treated with ticagrelor (146 of 1704 [8.6%]) compared with clopidogrel (51 of 1333 [3.8%]). Of patients initially treated with ticagrelor, only 1 (0.1% overall; 0.7% of all who switched) was switched based on CYP2C19 status. Of patients initially treated with clopidogrel, 23 (1.7% overall,;45.1% of all who switched) were switched owing to metabolizer status. Of 48 patients (3.6%) with reduced metabolizer status treated initially withclopidogrel, 15 (31.3%) were switched based on metabolizer status, including 48.1% (13 of 27) in which switching was prestipulated. Conclusions and Relevance: Physicians were evenly split on how to respond to knowledge of CYP2C19 metabolizer status in clopidogrel-treated patients. Mandatory provision of this information rarely prompted P2Y12 inhibitor switching overall, including a minority of patients with reduced metabolizer status. These findings highlight the clinical equipoise among physicians regarding use of this information and the reluctance to use information from routine genotyping in the absence of definitive clinical trial data demonstrating the efficacy of this approach. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02293395.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Physician behavior in response to knowledge of a patient's CYP2C19clopidogrel metabolizer status is unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of mandatory reporting of CYP2C19 pharmacogenomic testing, provided to investigators with no direct recommendations on how to use these results, with changes in P2Y12 inhibitor use, particularly clopidogrel, in the Randomized Trial to Compare the Safety of Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin in Addition to Either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome (GEMINI-ACS-1) clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The GEMINI-ACS-1 trial compared rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice daily, with aspirin, 100 mg daily, plus open-label clopidogrel or ticagrelor (provided), in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The trial included 371 clinical centers in 21 countries and 3037 patients with ACS. Data were analyzed between May 2017 and February 2019. Interventions: Investigators were required to prestipulate their planned response to CYP2C19 metabolizer status. In response to a regulatory mandate, results for all patients were reported to investigators approximately 1 week after randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reasons for switching P2Y12 inhibitors and occurrence of bleeding and ischemic events were collected. Results: Of 3037 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [9.0] years; 2275 men [74.9%], and 2824 white race/ethnicity [93.0%]), investigators initially treated 1704 (56.1%) with ticagrelor and 1333 (43.9%) with clopidogrel. Investigators prestipulated that they would use CYP2C19 metabolizer status to change P2Y12 inhibitor in 48.5% of genotyped clopidogrel-treated patients (n = 642 of 1324) and 5.5% of genotyped ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 93 of 1692). P2Y12 inhibitor switching for any reason occurred in 197 patients and was more common in patients treated with ticagrelor (146 of 1704 [8.6%]) compared with clopidogrel (51 of 1333 [3.8%]). Of patients initially treated with ticagrelor, only 1 (0.1% overall; 0.7% of all who switched) was switched based on CYP2C19 status. Of patients initially treated with clopidogrel, 23 (1.7% overall,;45.1% of all who switched) were switched owing to metabolizer status. Of 48 patients (3.6%) with reduced metabolizer status treated initially with clopidogrel, 15 (31.3%) were switched based on metabolizer status, including 48.1% (13 of 27) in which switching was prestipulated. Conclusions and Relevance: Physicians were evenly split on how to respond to knowledge of CYP2C19 metabolizer status in clopidogrel-treated patients. Mandatory provision of this information rarely prompted P2Y12 inhibitor switching overall, including a minority of patients with reduced metabolizer status. These findings highlight the clinical equipoise among physicians regarding use of this information and the reluctance to use information from routine genotyping in the absence of definitive clinical trial data demonstrating the efficacy of this approach. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02293395.
Authors: Jacob A Doll; Megan L Neely; Matthew T Roe; Paul W Armstrong; Harvey D White; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Kenneth J Winters; Suman Duvvuru; Scott S Sundseth; Joseph A Jakubowski; Paul A Gurbel; Deepak L Bhatt; E Magnus Ohman; Keith A A Fox Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul A Gurbel; Alan R Shuldiner; Kevin P Bliden; Kathaleen Ryan; Ruth E Pakyz; Udaya S Tantry Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Francesca Maria Notarangelo; Giuseppe Maglietta; Paola Bevilacqua; Marco Cereda; Piera Angelica Merlini; Giovanni Quinto Villani; Paolo Moruzzi; Giampiero Patrizi; Guidantonio Malagoli Tagliazucchi; Antonio Crocamo; Angela Guidorossi; Filippo Pigazzani; Elisa Nicosia; Giorgia Paoli; Marco Bianchessi; Mario Angelo Comelli; Caterina Caminiti; Diego Ardissino Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-03-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nihar R Desai; William J Canestaro; Pavlo Kyrychenko; Donald Chaplin; Lori A Martell; Troyen Brennan; Olga S Matlin; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-11-05
Authors: Thomas J Povsic; Matthew T Roe; Erik Magnus Ohman; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Stefan James; Alexei Plotnikov; Hardi Mundl; Robert Welsh; Christoph Bode; Charles Michael Gibson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jessica L Mega; Sandra L Close; Stephen D Wiviott; Lei Shen; Richard D Hockett; John T Brandt; Joseph R Walker; Elliott M Antman; William Macias; Eugene Braunwald; Marc S Sabatine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S A Scott; K Sangkuhl; C M Stein; J-S Hulot; J L Mega; D M Roden; T E Klein; M S Sabatine; J A Johnson; A R Shuldiner Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Larisa H Cavallari; Craig R Lee; Amber L Beitelshees; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julio D Duarte; Deepak Voora; Stephen E Kimmel; Caitrin W McDonough; Yan Gong; Chintan V Dave; Victoria M Pratt; Tameka D Alestock; R David Anderson; Jorge Alsip; Amer K Ardati; Brigitta C Brott; Lawrence Brown; Supatat Chumnumwat; Michael J Clare-Salzler; James C Coons; Joshua C Denny; Chrisly Dillon; Amanda R Elsey; Issam S Hamadeh; Shuko Harada; William B Hillegass; Lindsay Hines; Richard B Horenstein; Lucius A Howell; Linda J B Jeng; Mark D Kelemen; Yee Ming Lee; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; May Montasser; David R Nelson; Edith A Nutescu; Devon C Nwaba; Ruth E Pakyz; Kathleen Palmer; Josh F Peterson; Toni I Pollin; Alison H Quinn; Shawn W Robinson; Jamie Schub; Todd C Skaar; D Max Smith; Vindhya B Sriramoju; Petr Starostik; Tomasz P Stys; James M Stevenson; Nicholas Varunok; Mark R Vesely; Dyson T Wake; Karen E Weck; Kristin W Weitzel; Russell A Wilke; James Willig; Richard Y Zhao; Rolf P Kreutz; George A Stouffer; Philip E Empey; Nita A Limdi; Alan R Shuldiner; Almut G Winterstein; Julie A Johnson Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: B A L M Deiman; P A L Tonino; K Kouhestani; C E M Schrover; V Scharnhorst; L R C Dekker; N H J Pijls Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Stefan Russmann; Ali Rahmany; David Niedrig; Karl-Dietrich Hatz; Katja Ludin; Andrea M Burden; Lars Englberger; Roland Backhaus; Andreas Serra; Markus Béchir Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 2.953