Andreas Schüttler1,2, Rolf Altenburger1,2, Madeleine Ammar1, Marcella Bader-Blukott1, Gianina Jakobs1, Johanna Knapp1, Janet Krüger1, Kristin Reiche3, Gi-Mick Wu4, Wibke Busch1. 1. Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany. 2. Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany. 3. Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Perlickstr. 1, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. 4. DEVELOP, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemicals induce compound-specific changes in the transcriptome of an organism (toxicogenomic fingerprints). This provides potential insights about the cellular or physiological responses to chemical exposure and adverse effects, which is needed in assessment of chemical-related hazards or environmental health. In this regard, comparison or connection of different experiments becomes important when interpreting toxicogenomic experiments. Owing to lack of capturing response dynamics, comparability is often limited. In this study, we aim to overcome these constraints. RESULTS: We developed an experimental design and bioinformatic analysis strategy to infer time- and concentration-resolved toxicogenomic fingerprints. We projected the fingerprints to a universal coordinate system (toxicogenomic universe) based on a self-organizing map of toxicogenomic data retrieved from public databases. Genes clustering together in regions of the map indicate functional relation due to co-expression under chemical exposure. To allow for quantitative description and extrapolation of the gene expression responses we developed a time- and concentration-dependent regression model. We applied the analysis strategy in a microarray case study exposing zebrafish embryos to 3 selected model compounds including 2 cyclooxygenase inhibitors. After identification of key responses in the transcriptome we could compare and characterize their association to developmental, toxicokinetic, and toxicodynamic processes using the parameter estimates for affected gene clusters. Furthermore, we discuss an association of toxicogenomic effects with measured internal concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The design and analysis pipeline described here could serve as a blueprint for creating comparable toxicogenomic fingerprints of chemicals. It integrates, aggregates, and models time- and concentration-resolved toxicogenomic data.
BACKGROUND: Chemicals induce compound-specific changes in the transcriptome of an organism (toxicogenomic fingerprints). This provides potential insights about the cellular or physiological responses to chemical exposure and adverse effects, which is needed in assessment of chemical-related hazards or environmental health. In this regard, comparison or connection of different experiments becomes important when interpreting toxicogenomic experiments. Owing to lack of capturing response dynamics, comparability is often limited. In this study, we aim to overcome these constraints. RESULTS: We developed an experimental design and bioinformatic analysis strategy to infer time- and concentration-resolved toxicogenomic fingerprints. We projected the fingerprints to a universal coordinate system (toxicogenomic universe) based on a self-organizing map of toxicogenomic data retrieved from public databases. Genes clustering together in regions of the map indicate functional relation due to co-expression under chemical exposure. To allow for quantitative description and extrapolation of the gene expression responses we developed a time- and concentration-dependent regression model. We applied the analysis strategy in a microarray case study exposing zebrafish embryos to 3 selected model compounds including 2 cyclooxygenase inhibitors. After identification of key responses in the transcriptome we could compare and characterize their association to developmental, toxicokinetic, and toxicodynamic processes using the parameter estimates for affected gene clusters. Furthermore, we discuss an association of toxicogenomic effects with measured internal concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The design and analysis pipeline described here could serve as a blueprint for creating comparable toxicogenomic fingerprints of chemicals. It integrates, aggregates, and models time- and concentration-resolved toxicogenomic data.
Authors: Hisham K Hamadeh; Pierre R Bushel; Supriya Jayadev; Karla Martin; Olimpia DiSorbo; Stella Sieber; Lee Bennett; Raymond Tennant; Raymond Stoll; J Carl Barrett; Kerry Blanchard; Richard S Paules; Cynthia A Afshari Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Justin Lamb; Emily D Crawford; David Peck; Joshua W Modell; Irene C Blat; Matthew J Wrobel; Jim Lerner; Jean-Philippe Brunet; Aravind Subramanian; Kenneth N Ross; Michael Reich; Haley Hieronymus; Guo Wei; Scott A Armstrong; Stephen J Haggarty; Paul A Clemons; Ru Wei; Steven A Carr; Eric S Lander; Todd R Golub Journal: Science Date: 2006-09-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Marja Driessen; Anne S Kienhuis; Alexa P Vitins; Jeroen L A Pennings; Tessa E Pronk; Evert-Jan van den Brandhof; Marianne Roodbergen; Bob van de Water; Leo T M van der Ven Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Stephen M Rappaport; Dinesh K Barupal; David Wishart; Paolo Vineis; Augustin Scalbert Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Wiweka Kaszubska; H Douglas Falls; Verlyn G Schaefer; Deanna Haasch; Leigh Frost; Paul Hessler; Paul E Kroeger; David W White; Michael R Jirousek; James M Trevillyan Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2002-09-30 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: A Schüttler; G Jakobs; J M Fix; M Krauss; J Krüger; D Leuthold; R Altenburger; W Busch Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 9.031