John M Salsman1,2, Benjamin D Schalet3, Thomas V Merluzzi4, Crystal L Park5, Elizabeth A Hahn3,6, Mallory A Snyder7, David Cella3,6. 1. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. jsalsman@wakehealth.edu. 2. Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. jsalsman@wakehealth.edu. 3. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA. 5. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. 6. The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 7. University Research Administration, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: General self-efficacy is associated with adaptive coping and positive health outcomes. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) has developed self-efficacy item banks for managing chronic conditions, but lacks a general self-efficacy measure. We sought to refine and validate an item-response theory (IRT)-based measure of general self-efficacy for PROMIS®. METHODS: Ten items were modified from the NIH Toolbox® Self-Efficacy Item Bank by creating "confidence" response options, and administered to a general population sample (n = 1000) with the Toolbox® Self-Efficacy Item Bank, Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), and Generalized Expectancy for Success Scale (GESS). We split the sample in half for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). IRT analyses included evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF). RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 47.8 years and 50.3% were male. EFA showed all items loaded onto one dominant factor and CFA yielded a good fitting model for a general self-efficacy bank with confidence response options (CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.984, RMSEA = 0.090). Items showed no evidence of DIF by gender, age, education, or race. Internal consistency reliability was α = .94 and .88 for a new 10-item general self-efficacy bank and 4-item short form, respectively. The new bank was correlated with the LOT-R (r = .58), the GESS (r = .55), and the Toolbox® Self-Efficacy Item Bank (r = .87). CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS® General Self-Efficacy measure demonstrated sufficient unidimensionality and displayed good internal consistency reliability, model fit, and convergent validity. Further psychometric testing of the PROMIS® General Self-Efficacy Item Bank and Short Form can evaluate its utility in people with chronic health conditions.
AIMS: General self-efficacy is associated with adaptive coping and positive health outcomes. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) has developed self-efficacy item banks for managing chronic conditions, but lacks a general self-efficacy measure. We sought to refine and validate an item-response theory (IRT)-based measure of general self-efficacy for PROMIS®. METHODS: Ten items were modified from the NIH Toolbox® Self-Efficacy Item Bank by creating "confidence" response options, and administered to a general population sample (n = 1000) with the Toolbox® Self-Efficacy Item Bank, Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), and Generalized Expectancy for Success Scale (GESS). We split the sample in half for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). IRT analyses included evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF). RESULTS:Participants had a mean age of 47.8 years and 50.3% were male. EFA showed all items loaded onto one dominant factor and CFA yielded a good fitting model for a general self-efficacy bank with confidence response options (CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.984, RMSEA = 0.090). Items showed no evidence of DIF by gender, age, education, or race. Internal consistency reliability was α = .94 and .88 for a new 10-item general self-efficacy bank and 4-item short form, respectively. The new bank was correlated with the LOT-R (r = .58), the GESS (r = .55), and the Toolbox® Self-Efficacy Item Bank (r = .87). CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS® General Self-Efficacy measure demonstrated sufficient unidimensionality and displayed good internal consistency reliability, model fit, and convergent validity. Further psychometric testing of the PROMIS® General Self-Efficacy Item Bank and Short Form can evaluate its utility in people with chronic health conditions.
Authors: Bronson R Kunzler; Andrew J Foy; Benjamin H Levi; Lauren J Van Scoy; Erik B Lehman; Theresa J Smith; Michael J Green Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 2.090
Authors: Johannes Knauer; Yannik Terhorst; Paula Philippi; Selina Kallinger; Sandro Eiler; Reinhold Kilian; Tamara Waldmann; Morten Moshagen; Martina Bader; Harald Baumeister Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Selena Davis; Marcy Antonio; Mindy Smith; Paul Burgener; Danielle C Lavallee; Morgan Price; Sarah C Fletcher; Francis Lau Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-03-18
Authors: Alexandra Norcott; Chiao-Li Chan; Linda Nyquist; Julie P Bynum; Lillian Min; Michael D Fetters; Melissa DeJonckheere Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Erica Sood; Colette Gramszlo; Alejandra Perez Ramirez; Katherine Braley; Samantha C Butler; Jo Ann Davis; Allison A Divanovic; Lindsay A Edwards; Nadine Kasparian; Sarah L Kelly; Trent Neely; Cynthia M Ortinau; Erin Riegel; Amanda J Shillingford; Anne E Kazak Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2022-04-20
Authors: Catherine Benedict; Jennifer S Ford; Lidia Schapira; Pamela Simon; David Spiegel; Michael Diefenbach Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-29 Impact factor: 3.006