Literature DB >> 31140040

Type of clinical outcomes used by healthcare professionals to evaluate health-related quality of life domains to inform clinical decision making for chronic pain management.

Diana Zidarov1,2, Regina Visca3, Sara Ahmed4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) domains currently assessed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in secondary and tertiary hospital-based chronic pain clinics and the type of clinical outcomes (CO) used.
METHODS: Electronic cross-sectional survey (May to September 2016) based on domains of HRQoL included in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) framework.
RESULTS: HCPs response rate was 53% (36/68). Their mean clinical experience was 14.8 years (± 11.1), and their mean experience treating chronic pain (CP) population was 10.2 years (± 7.8). All PROMIS-HRQoL domains were assessed by HCPs (range 28-97%, mean = 64%) with a preponderance of domains related to physical health (mean = 82%). Standardized outcome measures (OMs) including performance outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were not frequently used (mean 0.5% and 3%, respectively) for assessing HRQoL domains compared to clinician reported outcomes (patient interviews, patient observation) (mean = 87%). Forty different OMs for assessing HRQoL domains were reported, and 30% of OMs were used by more than one HCP. HCPs expressed a need (range from 2.3 to 26.3%) for using more than one type of CO for assessing most domains of HRQoL (range from 2.3 to 26.3%) with a preference of using more PROs combined with CROs.
CONCLUSIONS: All domains of HRQoL are assessed by at least some HCPs for chronic pain management. Standardized OMs including performance-based measures and PROs were not frequently used, and there was no consistent use of the same OM across HCPs. A consensus among different stakeholders in chronic pain management on core domains of HRQoL and their associated OMs to promote a more evidence-based assessment is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Clinical outcomes; Evaluation; Health-related quality of life; Healthcare professionals; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31140040     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02215-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  4 in total

1.  Occupational Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Nursing Professionals: A Multi-Centre Study.

Authors:  María Dolores Ruiz-Fernández; Ángela María Ortega-Galán; Cayetano Fernández-Sola; José Manuel Hernández-Padilla; José Granero-Molina; Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Cross-Cultural Validation of Health and Quality of Life Measures for Children in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Hiu Lam Helen Sze; Cheuk Lam Beanie Fung; Pui Pui Phoebe Cheung; Tsz Yuk Amy Chim; Ming Ho Lee; Cheuk Chi Cynthia Law; Wui Man Benson Lau
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 1.565

3.  Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Diana Zidarov; Owis Eilayyan; Regina Visca
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Psychological Interventions for Women with Persistent Pelvic Pain: A Survey of Mental Health Clinicians.

Authors:  Tiffany Brooks; Rebecca Sharp; Susan Evans; John Baranoff; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-07-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.