Literature DB >> 31139989

A randomized Comparison of laparoscopic LEns defogging using Anti-fog solution, waRm saline, and chlorhexidine solution (CLEAR).

Taejong Song1, Dong Hee Lee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current literature demonstrates a lack of comparative in vivo studies regarding laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF). This randomized trial aimed to compare 3 popular methods of minimizing or reducing LLF in laparoscopic surgery by heating the lens using warm saline, applying anti-fog solution to the lens, and rubbing the lens with chlorhexidine solution.
METHODS: Ninety-six participants underwent randomization to be allocated in control (n = 24), warm saline (n = 24), anti-fog solution (n = 24), and chlorhexidine groups (n = 24). The primary outcome measure was the severity of LLF during the first 3 min after laparoscope insertion into the abdominal cavity. The severity of LLF was rated on a 10-point visual clarity scale ranging from 0 (clearest) to 10 (foggiest). The secondary outcome measures were (1) the severity of LLF during the remaining operative time other than the first 3 min, (2) the number of lens cleansings, and (3) the total time required to clean the lens.
RESULTS: Lens fogging during the first 3 min and remaining operative time other than the first 3 min was significantly decreased in the warm saline group compared to that in the other 3 groups (all, P < 0.001). In post hoc analysis, the anti-fog solution group was significantly foggier than the warm saline group, but clearer than the chlorhexidine and control groups. The number of lens cleansings and total time required to clean the lens were significantly lower in the warm saline and anti-fog solution groups than in the chlorhexidine and control groups (all, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The use of warm saline leads to significantly fewer fogging events than the use of anti-fog solution or chlorhexidine solution, resulting in an improved continuity of surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fogging; Laparoscopic lens defogging; Laparoscopy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31139989     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06852-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  The role and future of endoscopic imaging systems.

Authors:  M O Schurr; W Kunert; A Arezzo; G Buess
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  A safe and simple method to maintain a clear field of vision during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Kitano; M Tomikawa; Y Iso; S Iwata; K Gondo; M Moriyama; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic lens fogging: a review of etiology and methods to maintain a clear visual field.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Neil E Fleshner; Damien M Bolton
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  A simple and safe method for creating closed pneumoperitoneum in slim patients with firm abdominal skin.

Authors:  P A Jategaonkar; S P Jategaonkar; S P Yadav
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Visual Occlusion During Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Contemporary Review of Methods to Reduce Laparoscopic and Robotic Lens Fogging and Other Sources of Optical Loss.

Authors:  Todd G Manning; Marlon Perera; Daniel Christidis; Ned Kinnear; Shannon McGrath; Richard O'Beirne; Paul Zotov; Damien Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Comparative analysis of techniques to prevent laparoscopic fogging.

Authors:  Austin Drysch; Kenneth Schmitt; Brittany Uribe; Renai Yoon; Zhamshid Okhunov; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.442

8.  Laparoscopic lens fogging: solving a common surgical problem in standard and robotic laparoscopes via a scientific model.

Authors:  Todd G Manning; Nathan Papa; Marlon Perera; Shannon McGrath; Daniel Christidis; Munad Khan; Richard O'Beirne; Nicholas Campbell; Damien Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Povidone-iodine surgical scrub solution prevents fogging of the scope's lens during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Bijan Mohammadhosseini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Alternative agents to prevent fogging in head and neck endoscopy.

Authors:  Patorn Piromchai; Pornthep Kasemsiri; Sanguansak Thanaviratananich
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2011-01-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Slit-lamp mounted anti fogging fan.

Authors:  Sourav Damodaran; Sagnik Sen; Naresh Babu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  A simple solution to prevent microscope eyepiece fogging and spectacle fogging in COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Bharat Gurnani; Kirandeep Kaur; Kapil Mishra; Rengaraj Venkatesh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Effective cleaning of endoscopic lenses to achieve visual clarity for minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmad Nabeel; Salman K Al-Sabah; Hutan Ashrafian
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.