Literature DB >> 31139929

Using experience-based co-design to improve the pre-treatment care pathway for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer.

Gráinne C Brady1, Joanna Goodrich2, Justin W G Roe3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted that people diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC) have complex information needs. They are subject to multiple clinical appointments with numerous healthcare professionals in preparation for their treatment. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) are core members of the HNC multidisciplinary team, providing assessment, prehabilitation and counselling regarding potential treatment effects on the critical functions, including swallowing and communication. We believed the purpose of the pre-treatment speech-language therapy (SLT) consultation within this pathway is not well understood by patients. Whilst the benefits of prophylactic swallowing exercise prescriptions continue to be explored, adherence is a frequently cited challenge in clinical trials. We sought to enhance pre-treatment dysphagia services for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing chemoradiation.
METHODS: A participatory action research approach called experience-based co-design (EBCD) was undertaken at a tertiary cancer hospital in the UK. People who had previous radical radiation treatment for head and neck cancer and staff members within the head and neck unit were recruited to take part in in-depth, one-to-one interviews about their experiences of the pre-treatment SLT head and neck radiation clinic. Patient interviews were video-recorded, analysed and edited down to a 30 min 'trigger' film. At a subsequent patient feedback event, the film was shown and an 'emotional mapping' exercise was undertaken. Through facilitated discussion, patient priorities for change were agreed and recorded. At a staff feedback event, key themes from the staff interviews were discussed and priority areas for change identified. The project culminated in a joint patient and staff event where the film was viewed, experiences shared and joint priorities for change agreed. Task and finish groups were developed to implement these changes.
RESULTS: Seven patients and seven staff members participated. All seven patients had undergone radical (chemo-) radiation for HNC. At least 2 months had elapsed since their final treatment date and all participants were within 9 months of their definitive treatment. Staff members comprised a radiation oncologist, two clinical nurse specialists, two head and neck dietitians and two speech-language therapists. Patients reported that overall, their experience of the pre-treatment clinic is positive. Patients value experienced staff, consistency of staff and the messages they provide and a team approach. Patients highlighted the need for different information methods including online/digital information resources and further information regarding the longer-term effects of treatment. Patients valued the purposes of prophylactic exercises and again advocated for supporting resources to be available in a range of online/digital media. Staff members raised the need for flexibility in appointment times and clearer messaging as to the rationale for a pre-treatment SLT appointment, including a rebranding of the SLT service. Seven key areas for improvement were identified jointly by patients and staff members including revision of patient and carer information, development of a patient experience video, information on timelines for recovery, a buddy system for patients before, during and after treatment, flexibility of appointment scheduling, seamless transfer of care between settings and SLT department rebranding. Joint patient and staff task and finish groups were initiated to work on these seven priority areas.
CONCLUSIONS: We have worked in partnership with patients to co-design pre-treatment dysphagia services which are accessible and meet the individuals' needs. Task and finish groups are ongoing with staff and patients are working together to address priority areas for change. This work provides a good example for other centres who may wish to engage in similar activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-design; Head and neck cancer; Patient experience; Pre-treatment; Quality experience

Year:  2019        PMID: 31139929     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04877-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  9 in total

1.  Patient and carer experiences of nutrition in cancer care: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Jenelle Loeliger; Sarah Dewar; Nicole Kiss; Allison Drosdowsky; Jane Stewart
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Pathway redesign: putting patients ahead of professionals.

Authors:  Michael Pw Grocott
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  An evaluation of the provision of oncology rehabilitation services via telemedicine using a participatory design approach.

Authors:  Grainne Brady; Kate Ashforth; Siobhan Cowan-Dickie; Sarah Dewhurst; Natalie Harris; Alline Monteiro; Catherine Sandsund; Justin Roe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 4.  Availability and use of web-based interventions for patients with head and neck cancer: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rosemary Kelly; Peter Gordon; Ruth Thompson; Cherith Semple
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Using experience-based codesign to coproduce aphasia rehabilitation services: study protocol.

Authors:  Lisa Anemaat; Victoria J Palmer; David A Copland; Kathryn Mainstone; Kent Druery; Julia Druery; Bruce Aisthorpe; Geoffrey Binge; Penelope Mainstone; Sarah J Wallace
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Co-designing a cancer care intervention: reflections of participants and a doctoral researcher on roles and contributions.

Authors:  Mary Anne Lagmay Tanay; Jo Armes; Catherine Oakley; Lesley Sage; Deb Tanner; Jose Roca; Liz Bryson; Barbara Greenall; Lauren Urwin; Toni Wyatt; Glenn Robert
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-08-02

7.  Methodology for the development of National Multidisciplinary Management Recommendations using a multi-stage meta-consensus initiative.

Authors:  John C Hardman; Kevin Harrington; Tom Roques; Sanjai Sood; Jemy Jose; Shane Lester; Paul Pracy; Ricard Simo; Costa Repanos; Frank Stafford; Chris Jennings; Stuart C Winter; Hugh Wheatly; Jarrod Homer; B Nirmal Kumar; Vinidh Paleri
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.612

8.  Not Just Dyspnoea: Swallowing as a Concern for Adults with Laryngotracheal Stenosis Undergoing Airway Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gemma M Clunie; Athina Belsi; Justin W G Roe; Caroline M Alexander; Gurpreet Sandhu; Alison McGregor
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  The bigger picture of shared decision making: A service design perspective using the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer as a case.

Authors:  Ingeborg P M Griffioen; Judith A C Rietjens; Marijke Melles; Dirk Snelders; Marjolein Y V Homs; Casper H van Eijck; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.